Undertones v Bigger Lovers

[Bags]

Okay, I think I recall that the Bigger Lovers may be back at some point, but that's up in the air.  But, just wondering if there's a landslide of interest in the Undertones show.
 
 Also, anyone think Undertones will sell out?
 
 Then Sunday is Metropolitan & the Rosebuds at the Warehouse....

[MiloGTC]

Originally posted by Bags:
  Okay, I think I recall that the Bigger Lovers may be back at some point, but that's up in the air.  But, just wondering if there's a landslide of interest in the Undertones show.
 
 Also, anyone think Undertones will sell out?
 
 Then Sunday is Metropolitan & the Rosebuds at the Warehouse....

The Undertones will probably not be back. The Bigger Lovers probably will. QED.

[kosmo vinyl]

As much as I like the Undertones, without Feagal a bit of the magic is going to missing.  With that said I'm in for the Bigger Lovers who haven't been around these parts in at least a year.

[Charlie Nakatestes, Japanese Golfer]

Bigger Lovers are first band on a three band night. What do you reckon? Maybe a 30 minute set? I'd see them if they were headlining, or supporting someone good. Don't think I'd go to this show though. Note: The Pernice Brothers/Bigger Lovers show at Ottobar has been taken off the schedule.
 
    Never heard of the Undertones.

[brennser]

I will be at The Undertones - even sans Fergal it should be a good show and some of the new stuff is very good

[edbert]

My Undertones anecdote: last year I was walking in London and came upon a huge St Pat's street festival happening on the South Bank.  I noticed as I was crossing from there back over to Westminster that on a big stage they had live acts playing, folkish stuff.  A few minutes later as I was crossing St James park,  I could just barely hear in the distance that The Undertones were playing!   I started walking back but they only played that one tune (Get Over You) and were finished before I even got to the river.  Sounded great though
 
 And my Bigger Lovers anecdote:  they played one Sat afternoon at that indie CD store in Clarendon, for about 5 people one dog and the store staff. Someone in the band said it was a bigger audience than at their Velvet Lounge show the previous night!  I wanted to see what all the fuss was about after reading the glowing write-ups in in the City Paper, and left thinking that the writer who keeps building them up must be a friend of the band

[mankie]

Originally posted by brennser:
  I will be at The Undertones - even sans Fergal it should be a good show and some of the new stuff is very good

How can it be The Undertones without Fergal? There's nobody could sound like him, and his voice is so unique that it IS The Undertones...no?

[brennser]

There's nobody could sound like him, and his voice is so unique that it IS The Undertones...no?  

well theres only one way to find out and for me the undertones were and are much more about great guitar pop songs than fergals voice

[mankie]

Originally posted by brennser:
   

There's nobody could sound like him, and his voice is so unique that it IS The Undertones...no?  

well theres only one way to find out and for me the undertones were and are much more about great guitar pop songs than fergals voice [/b]

I had to cut my comment short because I got paged...."I meant to add, if you're going for nostalga."
 
  I'm sure it will still be a good show by a band who play great pop-songs, but not The Undertones as we remember them.

[redsock]

Originally posted by Rutherford J. Balls:
 
    Never heard of the Undertones.

Really Rhett, you should read BigYawn more often.

[brennser]

I'm sure it will still be a good show by a band who play great pop-songs, but not The Undertones as we remember them.  

we're not going to agree on this mankie - is that the royal "we" you're using there?
 
 you don't want to go because you think its a cover band - I want to go because Fergal did nothing but sing AND they have a new album out with some damn good songs on them, easily as good as anything they've done

[markie]

Originally posted by brennser:
 

 easily as good as anything they've done [/b]

Which song is as good as teenage kicks?
 
 You over stated your case Brennser. The new album is OK, but it would be cool to hear some of those old hits live. There might not be another chance to. Its not like its an expensive show or anything, Mankie.

[mankie]

Originally posted by brennser:
   

I'm sure it will still be a good show by a band who play great pop-songs, but not The Undertones as we remember them.  

we're not going to agree on this mankie - is that the royal "we" you're using there?
 
 you don't want to go because you think its a cover band - I want to go because Fergal did nothing but sing AND they have a new album out with some damn good songs on them, easily as good as anything they've done [/b]

I suppose I'm comparing it to the time I went to see The Specials at the 930 a few years ago. Terry Hall wasn't with them, and although it was The Specials...it really wasn't if you know what I mean.
 
 Maybe a better comparison would be The Pogues. Shane MacGowan is really The Pogues, but even without him they are still a great, great band called The Pogues.
 
 Can we agree on that and move on?

[mankie]

Originally posted by mark e smith:
   

Originally posted by brennser:
 

 easily as good as anything they've done [/b]

Which song is as good as teenage kicks?
 
 You over stated your case Brennser. The new album is OK, but it would be cool to hear some of those old hits live. There might not be another chance to. Its not like its an expensive show or anything, Mankie. [/b]

Oh, I'm not being my usual stubborn old git and boycotting them at all, it's just mid-week shows don't really do it for me unless it was a Smiths reunion or something, and Wednesday is a night I can't miss doing something else.

[brennser]

Maybe a better comparison would be The Pogues. Shane MacGowan is really The Pogues, but even without him they are still a great, great band called The Pogues.
 
 Can we agree on that and move on?  

ok