Author Topic: bands better on drugs... bands better clean...  (Read 9156 times)

Sage 703

  • Member
  • Posts: 1710
Re: bands better on drugs... bands better clean...
« Reply #15 on: July 05, 2007, 11:48:00 am »
Wilco - better on drugs

eltee

  • Member
  • Posts: 3809
Re: bands better on drugs... bands better clean...
« Reply #16 on: July 05, 2007, 11:54:00 am »
What about those good either way?
 Foo!
 and Slash still kicks ass.

RatBastard

  • Member
  • Posts: 2955
    • Obscenitees
Re: bands better on drugs... bands better clean...
« Reply #17 on: July 05, 2007, 01:08:00 pm »
Well I wasnt too sure if the concept was bands that sound better while THEY are on drugs or ones that sound better while you the listener was on drugs....
 
 
 Former: Aerosmith (unfortunately they have gone pop now)...
 Later: The Dead of course!
FUKIT

ConversationDiva

  • Member
  • Posts: 56
Re: bands better on drugs... bands better clean...
« Reply #18 on: July 06, 2007, 04:25:00 pm »
babyshambles much better live when pete isnt fucked off his face

RatBastard

  • Member
  • Posts: 2955
    • Obscenitees
Re: bands better on drugs... bands better clean...
« Reply #19 on: July 06, 2007, 04:59:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Big KC:
  the band's state of mind, not the listeners.
 
 Pearl Jam - better sober
 Metallica - suck sober
With metallica its the same no matter what!  GAK...
FUKIT

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 21782
  • I don't belong here.
Re: bands better on drugs... bands better clean...
« Reply #20 on: July 06, 2007, 06:58:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by you be pickup:
  Bowie was better on drugs, as was Iggy.
on the latter - just barely.  based on his performance earlier this year at the club i'd say iggy's still got it despite getting back on the wagon... i believe that some 1200 people in attendance that night will back me on this.  
 
 now the question is, are the smashing pumpkins better to see while on drugs or clean?  'CAUSE I JUST GOT TICKETS, BITCHES!!!
 
 <averting the predictable snide remarks: "the pumpkins are best not seen at all". har. har.>
<sig>

joz

  • Member
  • Posts: 492
Re: bands better on drugs... bands better clean...
« Reply #21 on: July 07, 2007, 12:56:00 pm »
pumpkins definitely better on drugs. saw them 10 years ago and got pulled over by the coppers after the show. lucky for me i didn't get a dui or car search.
 
 richard ashcroft/verve - better on drugs
 stones - better on drugs
 (agree) wilco - better on drugs
 lou reed - better on drugs
 eric clapton - better on drugs
 
 honestly, i can't think of anyone who is better since climbing on the wagon.

Re: bands better on drugs... bands better clean...
« Reply #22 on: July 07, 2007, 02:04:00 pm »
Steve Earle is much better on the wagon. And have to disagree on Wilco.
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by joz:
  pumpkins definitely better on drugs. saw them 10 years ago and got pulled over by the coppers after the show. lucky for me i didn't get a dui or car search.
 
 richard ashcroft/verve - better on drugs
 stones - better on drugs
 (agree) wilco - better on drugs
 lou reed - better on drugs
 eric clapton - better on drugs
 
 honestly, i can't think of anyone who is better since climbing on the wagon.

betlbum2

  • Guest
Re: bands better on drugs... bands better clean...
« Reply #23 on: July 07, 2007, 07:29:00 pm »
Trent Reznor, much better when he was on drugs. Just compare Downward to the new stuff.

Mobius

  • Member
  • Posts: 1289
Re: bands better on drugs... bands better clean...
« Reply #24 on: July 08, 2007, 03:10:00 pm »
I was thinking about NIN.  If I'm not mistaken, I read an interview where Reznor said he didn't get heavily into drugs until after TDS . . . he kind of dove into the persona he created.  I think NIN falls into the same category as Oasis - where 'recreational' drugs led to a burst of creativity which created a world that led to harder stuff which killed said creativity.
 
 I think Depeche Mode also falls in that category.  I think I also read that Gahan started doing smack after seeing Jane's Addition post-Violator and thinking to himself "I'm a rock star . . . I should do that."  The rest (and Depeche Mode's glory days) is history.
 
 Hey, Anyone here like The Smashing Pumpkins?  We used to think that Gish (and Starla etc from the era) were products of a band on the same drug induced wavelength.  But "despite all my rage I'm still just a rat in a cage" sounds like dead misguided sober poetry.  I feel like Corgan sobered up and became so tedious he drove everyone else over the edge drug-wise.  Just theoretical though.  Billy?

palahniukkubrick

  • Guest
Re: bands better on drugs... bands better clean...
« Reply #25 on: July 08, 2007, 03:53:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Mobius:
  I think Depeche Mode also falls in that category.  I think I also read that Gahan started doing smack after seeing Jane's Addition post-Violator and thinking to himself "I'm a rock star . . . I should do that."  The rest (and Depeche Mode's glory days) is history.
 
That's weird he would think that because Jane's Addiction has sucked since about the time 'Violator' came out, in '90 or '91.

K8teebug

  • Member
  • Posts: 4124
Re: bands better on drugs... bands better clean...
« Reply #26 on: July 09, 2007, 07:51:00 am »
Modest Mouse is much better sober.  I saw them drunk and it was terrible.

walkonby

  • Guest
Re: bands better on drugs... bands better clean...
« Reply #27 on: July 09, 2007, 06:11:00 pm »
smashing pumpkins

Sage 703

  • Member
  • Posts: 1710
Re: bands better on drugs... bands better clean...
« Reply #28 on: July 09, 2007, 06:30:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by walkonby:
  smashing pumpkins
I don't think the Pumpkins have ever been totally clean.  They're not doing heroin, but Corgan has readily admitted using mushrooms regularly throughout the recording of Adore, and has never been a drinker.  He claims an alcohol allergy.

Frank Gallagher

  • Member
  • Posts: 4792
Re: bands better on drugs... bands better clean...
« Reply #29 on: July 10, 2007, 09:34:00 am »
Don't we all have allergic reactions to alcohol if we drink enough?  ;)