Author Topic: bands better on drugs... bands better clean...  (Read 9154 times)

Big KC

  • Member
  • Posts: 125
bands better on drugs... bands better clean...
« on: July 03, 2007, 09:52:00 pm »
thinking about this after hearing the new Ryan Adams and being pleasantly surprised... he's much better clean than high.... others???
 
 aerosmith - better on drugs
 chili peppers - better on the wagon

Brian_Wallace

  • Member
  • Posts: 1484
Re: bands better on drugs... bands better clean...
« Reply #1 on: July 04, 2007, 07:38:00 am »
I must be out of the loop.  I didn't know Ryan Adams was "clean."  Actually, I didn't think he was that "dirty" in terms of drugs to begin with.  I knew he drank a lot.
 
 Suede (better on drugs.)
 
 Oasis (better on lesser quality drugs.  Once they were able to get top-shelf blow it was all downhill ("Morning Glory"/Be Here Now/etc.))
 
 Ummm...Ozzy? (better on drugs.)
 
 Since my dad is a gym/health teacher and preaches "Just Say No!" I HAVE to come up with someone who was better clean...(I actually had a dream last night in which my father was buying $20,000 worth of heroin but I digress...)
 
 Oh, the first Black Grape album (Shaun Ryder.)  Better clean.  That was better than any Happy Mondays album.
 
 Brian

Re: bands better on drugs... bands better clean...
« Reply #2 on: July 04, 2007, 08:11:00 am »
So the Chili Peppers have been on drugs the last 20 years?
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by Big KC:
  thinking about this after hearing the new Ryan Adams and being pleasantly surprised... he's much better clean than high.... others???
 
 aerosmith - better on drugs
 chili peppers - better on the wagon

Re: bands better on drugs... bands better clean...
« Reply #3 on: July 04, 2007, 08:13:00 am »
http://www.philly.com/inquirer/weekend/music/8258912.html
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by Brian_Walalce:
  I must be out of the loop.  I didn't know Ryan Adams was "clean."  Actually, I didn't think he was that "dirty" in terms of drugs to begin with.  I knew he drank a lot.
 
 
 Brian

Frank Gallagher

  • Member
  • Posts: 4792
Re: bands better on drugs... bands better clean...
« Reply #4 on: July 04, 2007, 10:42:00 am »
Wait - who's high/clean? Us or the artist?

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 21782
  • I don't belong here.
Re: bands better on drugs... bands better clean...
« Reply #5 on: July 04, 2007, 06:24:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Roadbike Mankie:
  Wait - who's high/clean? Us or the artist?
my question exactly... i'm assuming the question is about the listener's state of mind.  artists almost universally suck after rehab - y'all are feel free to offer up an example to the contrary...
<sig>

Re: bands better on drugs... bands better clean...
« Reply #6 on: July 04, 2007, 08:00:00 pm »
wrong on your assumption
 
   
Quote
Originally posted by sweetcell:
   
Quote
Originally posted by Roadbike Mankie:
  Wait - who's high/clean? Us or the artist?
my question exactly... i'm assuming the question is about the listener's state of mind.  artists almost universally suck after rehab - y'all are feel free to offer up an example to the contrary... [/b]

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 21782
  • I don't belong here.
Re: bands better on drugs... bands better clean...
« Reply #7 on: July 04, 2007, 11:00:00 pm »
i note a lack of proof/examples in your rebuttal.  i also note a general lack of explanation  :)   i'm not saying it's always the case... i am saying that i can't think of any examples, which isn't a good sign for your position.  but please, show me otherwise.
<sig>

nkotb

  • Member
  • Posts: 6173
Re: bands better on drugs... bands better clean...
« Reply #8 on: July 05, 2007, 07:34:00 am »
I think Rhett means your assumption about the listener's state of mind.  I'm pretty sure we're all talking about the band's drug use.
 
   
Quote
Originally posted by sweetcell:
  i note a lack of proof/examples in your rebuttal.  i also note a general lack of explanation    :)     i'm not saying it's always the case... i am saying that i can't think of any examples, which isn't a good sign for your position.  but please, show me otherwise.

tigersscareme

  • Member
  • Posts: 414
Re: bands better on drugs... bands better clean...
« Reply #9 on: July 05, 2007, 08:32:00 am »
the laughing hyenas.
 i liked watching larissa playy guitar and drink whiskey at the same time.
 
 
 wasn't quite the same when she was clean

Frank Gallagher

  • Member
  • Posts: 4792
Re: bands better on drugs... bands better clean...
« Reply #10 on: July 05, 2007, 09:08:00 am »
Absolutely no difference wether performing trashed or sober category winner.......
 
 (hushed silence and then drum roll)
 
 
 SHANE MACGOWAN!!!

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 21782
  • I don't belong here.
Re: bands better on drugs... bands better clean...
« Reply #11 on: July 05, 2007, 09:46:00 am »
he has performed sober?
<sig>

Big KC

  • Member
  • Posts: 125
Re: bands better on drugs... bands better clean...
« Reply #12 on: July 05, 2007, 09:52:00 am »
the band's state of mind, not the listeners.
 
 Pearl Jam - better sober
 Metallica - suck sober

palahniukkubrick

  • Guest
Re: bands better on drugs... bands better clean...
« Reply #13 on: July 05, 2007, 11:12:00 am »
Bowie was better on drugs, as was Iggy.

Eileen Fitzgerald

  • Member
  • Posts: 11
Re: bands better on drugs... bands better clean...
« Reply #14 on: July 05, 2007, 11:48:00 am »
Once David Gahan got clean, Depeche Mode tanked