Author Topic: Melissa Etheridge - FOUR nights @ 9:30  (Read 15706 times)

sonickteam2

  • Guest
Re: Melissa Etheridge - FOUR nights @ 9:30
« Reply #15 on: December 17, 2003, 08:51:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by J'Mal:
  That's a lot of lesbians.
thats preciselly what i was thinking.
 
  a whole lot of lesbians.  
 
   like my last trip to Seattle.

MaLo

  • Member
  • Posts: 670
Re: Melissa Etheridge - FOUR nights @ 9:30
« Reply #16 on: December 17, 2003, 09:48:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by Jaguär:
  It always happens that way Flawd.
 
 I had no idea that there were that many lesbians in the area. (Bags excluded.     ;)    ) It's always seemed that most of the Gays were men. Nice to know the balance of Straights and Gays may be more even then I had thought. It's bad enough that we women already out number the men around here.
you've never been to wolftrap on nites that the Indigo Girls or Ani Difranco are playing.  those were my favorite nites to work.  the box office was a great place to people watch.

mankie

  • Guest
Re: Melissa Etheridge - FOUR nights @ 9:30
« Reply #17 on: December 17, 2003, 11:16:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by J'Mal:
  That's a lot of lesbians.
Can't have too many..as long as they're the lipstick variety of course.

mankie

  • Guest
Re: Melissa Etheridge - FOUR nights @ 9:30
« Reply #18 on: December 17, 2003, 11:17:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by mark e smith:
  alternatively, "There's no wrong way to fuck a girl with no legs, just tell her you love her as she's crawling away."
I've bonked many a legless woman before!  ;)

paige

  • Guest
Re: Melissa Etheridge - FOUR nights @ 9:30
« Reply #19 on: December 17, 2003, 01:55:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by mankie:
   
Quote
Originally posted by mark e smith:
  alternatively, "There's no wrong way to fuck a girl with no legs, just tell her you love her as she's crawling away."
I've bonked many a legless woman before!   ;)  [/b]
cause that's all you can get!!!!

mankie

  • Guest
Re: Melissa Etheridge - FOUR nights @ 9:30
« Reply #20 on: December 17, 2003, 02:15:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by i do not heart winter:
   
Quote
Originally posted by mankie:
   
Quote
Originally posted by mark e smith:
  alternatively, "There's no wrong way to fuck a girl with no legs, just tell her you love her as she's crawling away."
I've bonked many a legless woman before!    ;)   [/b]
cause that's all you can get!!!! [/b]
Can I buy you a drink?  ;)

helicon1

  • Member
  • Posts: 469
Re: Melissa Etheridge - FOUR nights @ 9:30
« Reply #21 on: December 18, 2003, 02:39:00 pm »
$75!!! Wow. Enough said.

Bags

  • Member
  • Posts: 8540
Re: Melissa Etheridge - FOUR nights @ 9:30
« Reply #22 on: December 18, 2003, 02:49:00 pm »
It's $75 -- holy bejesus.  I'm not going unless she signs an affidavit in her own blood she's only playing songs from her first two albums.

Re: Melissa Etheridge - FOUR nights @ 9:30
« Reply #23 on: December 18, 2003, 02:54:00 pm »
I guess lesbians have more disposable income given that many of them don't have children nor do they have to buy nice clothes to impress men with. So $75 shouldn't be a detractor.

mankie

  • Guest
Re: Melissa Etheridge - FOUR nights @ 9:30
« Reply #24 on: December 18, 2003, 03:06:00 pm »
Personally I wouldn't pay $10 to see her, but the club knows what it's doing because you never see a show cancelled for lack of ticket sales....well, apart from the second B&S show that time.  :D

Re: Melissa Etheridge - FOUR nights @ 9:30
« Reply #25 on: December 18, 2003, 03:13:00 pm »
I think it's that you get to see her in such an intimate venue. I mean, think about it, if you were a lesbian, wouldn't you prefer getting to see her while you're scrunched together with a thousand other lesbians?
 
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by mankie:
 
 
 HEY! If people are willing to pay $200+ for Simon & Garfunkel, $75 is chump change to them....but then again, how the hell is Etheridge worth more than Bowie? Are lesbians wealthier than gays and old people?   :D  

J'Mal

  • Guest
Re: Melissa Etheridge - FOUR nights @ 9:30
« Reply #26 on: December 18, 2003, 03:42:00 pm »
Alot of us would pay extra to be scrunched between some lesbians.
 
 But we'd want better music to go with that.

Celeste

  • Guest
Re: Melissa Etheridge - FOUR nights @ 9:30
« Reply #27 on: December 18, 2003, 03:48:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Rhett Miller:
  I guess lesbians [don't] have to buy nice clothes to impress men with. So $75 shouldn't be a detractor.
you are terrible!!!!!!!!!!!!!

paige

  • Guest
Re: Melissa Etheridge - FOUR nights @ 9:30
« Reply #28 on: December 18, 2003, 03:51:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Rhett Miller:
  I guess lesbians have more disposable income given that many of them don't have children nor do they have to buy nice clothes to impress men with. So $75 shouldn't be a detractor.
what about the clothes they want to buy to impress women with? (can't wait for the response..)

Sir HC

  • Member
  • Posts: 4059
Re: Melissa Etheridge - FOUR nights @ 9:30
« Reply #29 on: December 18, 2003, 03:52:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Rhett Miller:
  I guess lesbians have more disposable income given that many of them don't have children nor do they have to buy nice clothes to impress men with. So $75 shouldn't be a detractor.
I know of many more lesbian couples with a child (sperm donor) than gay couples.