Welcome to the new forum
Originally posted by J'Mal: That's a lot of lesbians.
Originally posted by Jaguär: It always happens that way Flawd. I had no idea that there were that many lesbians in the area. (Bags excluded. ) It's always seemed that most of the Gays were men. Nice to know the balance of Straights and Gays may be more even then I had thought. It's bad enough that we women already out number the men around here.
Originally posted by mark e smith: alternatively, "There's no wrong way to fuck a girl with no legs, just tell her you love her as she's crawling away."
Originally posted by mankie: QuoteOriginally posted by mark e smith: alternatively, "There's no wrong way to fuck a girl with no legs, just tell her you love her as she's crawling away." I've bonked many a legless woman before! [/b]
Originally posted by i do not heart winter: QuoteOriginally posted by mankie: QuoteOriginally posted by mark e smith: alternatively, "There's no wrong way to fuck a girl with no legs, just tell her you love her as she's crawling away." I've bonked many a legless woman before! [/b]cause that's all you can get!!!! [/b]
Originally posted by mankie: HEY! If people are willing to pay $200+ for Simon & Garfunkel, $75 is chump change to them....but then again, how the hell is Etheridge worth more than Bowie? Are lesbians wealthier than gays and old people?
Originally posted by Rhett Miller: I guess lesbians [don't] have to buy nice clothes to impress men with. So $75 shouldn't be a detractor.
Originally posted by Rhett Miller: I guess lesbians have more disposable income given that many of them don't have children nor do they have to buy nice clothes to impress men with. So $75 shouldn't be a detractor.