new movie to make you mad

[chaz]

Not sure how this supports or debunks any argument, but Lou Reed has put out at least 2 brilliant albums since Goonies (which I have never seen so therefore can not comment on) was released.

[thirsty moore]

Go fuck yourself Brian.

[walkonby]

i see nothing much has changed.  ahhh....

[Brian_Wallace]

Originally posted by chaz:
  Not sure how this supports or debunks any argument, but Lou Reed has put out at least 2 brilliant albums since Goonies (which I have never seen so therefore can not comment on) was released.

Mistrial (1986)
 New York (1989)
 Magic and Loss (1992)
 Set the Twilight Reeling (1996)
 Ecstasy (2000)
 The Raven (2003)
 Hudson River Wind Meditations (2007)
 
 In your book, two of those are "brilliant?"  Brilliant?  Ok.  Remind me never to listen to your opinion ever again.  Although, I doubt if I ever did in the first place.
 
 Brian
 
 P.S.  By the way, which track pushed the needle over to "Brilliant" for you, "Sex With Your Parents (Motherf***er), Pt. 2" or "Harry's Circumcision?"

[Charlie Nakatestes, Japanese Golfer]

New York was a decent album.

[chaz]

Songs for Drella with John Cale is prob my fave of his from the 80's.  You'd love it Brian, it's a biographical piece about that over-rated faggot poster maker Andy Warhol.  What a douche he was.

[Charlie Nakatestes, Japanese Golfer]

He was kind of a douche, wasn't he? I came away with that thought after reading a biography of him. Cool painter though. Right up there with Davinchi and Van Gogh.

[Brian_Wallace]

Originally posted by chaz:
  Songs for Drella with John Cale is prob my fave of his from the 80's.  You'd love it Brian, it's a biographical piece about that over-rated faggot poster maker Andy Warhol.  What a douche he was.

Did this Andy dude take his name from the Dandy Warhols?
 
 Brian

[chaz]

Originally posted by Charlie Nakatestes,Japanese Golfer:
  He was kind of a douche, wasn't he? I came away with that thought after reading a biography of him. Cool painter though. Right up there with Davinchi and Van Gogh.

Does it matter?  He painted most of that shit in the 60's and 70's.  He's irrelevant now.

[Brian_Wallace]

Originally posted by chaz:
   

Originally posted by Charlie Nakatestes,Japanese Golfer:
  He was kind of a douche, wasn't he? I came away with that thought after reading a biography of him. Cool painter though. Right up there with Davinchi and Van Gogh.

Does it matter?  He painted most of that shit in the 60's and 70's.  He's irrelevant now. [/b]

Amen.
 
 Brian

[Charlie Nakatestes, Japanese Golfer]

O come on now, I'm no art expert (or music expert either), but he's as relevant in his field as Lou Reed is, right?
 
 

Originally posted by chaz:
   

Originally posted by Charlie Nakatestes,Japanese Golfer:
  He was kind of a douche, wasn't he? I came away with that thought after reading a biography of him. Cool painter though. Right up there with Davinchi and Van Gogh.

Does it matter?  He painted most of that shit in the 60's and 70's.  He's irrelevant now. [/b]

[chaz]

None of those dinosaurs are relevant or matter for shit now and you're a fucking idiot for asking that question.

Originally posted by Charlie Nakatestes,Japanese Golfer:
  O come on now, I'm no art expert (or music expert either), but he's as relevant in his field as Lou Reed is, right?
 
   

Originally posted by chaz:
   

Originally posted by Charlie Nakatestes,Japanese Golfer:
  He was kind of a douche, wasn't he? I came away with that thought after reading a biography of him. Cool painter though. Right up there with Davinchi and Van Gogh.

Does it matter?  He painted most of that shit in the 60's and 70's.  He's irrelevant now. [/b]

[/b]

[Charlie Nakatestes, Japanese Golfer]

Thanks for clearing that up Brian.
 
 

Originally posted by chaz:
  None of those dinosaurs are relevant or matter for shit now and you're a fucking idiot for asking that question.  

Originally posted by Charlie Nakatestes,Japanese Golfer:
  O come on now, I'm no art expert (or music expert either), but he's as relevant in his field as Lou Reed is, right?
 
   

Originally posted by chaz:
     

Originally posted by Charlie Nakatestes,Japanese Golfer:
  He was kind of a douche, wasn't he? I came away with that thought after reading a biography of him. Cool painter though. Right up there with Davinchi and Van Gogh.

Does it matter?  He painted most of that shit in the 60's and 70's.  He's irrelevant now. [/b]

[/b]

[/b]

[walkonby]

people are scared of faggots.  they are better than you.  deal with it.  warhol had more talent as a human being than most will ever that have come after him.  he changed the way EVERYTHING is advertised.  he altered music with his shows supporting velvet u.  he made people hate to look at the true art that went behind the film making process.  and he was a gay.  and he was better than you.  deal with it, non-faggots.

[chaz]

Just be glad i'm here to remind you that everything old is old and lame man.  Fuck all that shit.  You're all so fucked and lame.
 
 

Originally posted by Charlie Nakatestes,Japanese Golfer:
  Thanks for clearing that up Brian.
 
   

Originally posted by chaz:
  None of those dinosaurs are relevant or matter for shit now and you're a fucking idiot for asking that question.  

Originally posted by Charlie Nakatestes,Japanese Golfer:
  O come on now, I'm no art expert (or music expert either), but he's as relevant in his field as Lou Reed is, right?
 
     

Originally posted by chaz:
     

Originally posted by Charlie Nakatestes,Japanese Golfer:
  He was kind of a douche, wasn't he? I came away with that thought after reading a biography of him. Cool painter though. Right up there with Davinchi and Van Gogh.

Does it matter?  He painted most of that shit in the 60's and 70's.  He's irrelevant now. [/b]

[/b]

[/b]

[/b]