« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Grammy nominations  (Read 2778 times)

Bombay Chutney

  • Member
  • Posts: 3960
Grammy nominations
« on: December 04, 2003, 04:05:00 pm »
So the Grammy nominations are out.
 
 Fountains of Wayne are up for "Best New Artist".
 Lots of recently dead people are up for awards.  Some of those may be deserved, but I can't help but think they got more than a few sympathy votes.   The White Stripes are in there too.
 
 www.grammys.com
Logged

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: Grammy nominations
« Reply #1 on: December 04, 2003, 04:10:00 pm »
I like that both Bill and Hillary are nominated for a Grammy.
 
 Bill's is the more interesting story.  He's up for spoken word performance for a remake of Prokofiev's Peter and the Wolf.  In the new sanitized, politically correct version, the story is told from the Wolf's perspective.  The Wolf is victimized by urbanization, polluted streams and the rapid loss of his forestland habitat.  this explains his aggressive behavior.  In the new ending, the Wolf is relocated and released in a protected wilderness area.
 
 Nothing like making the classics bleeding-heart-friendly.
Logged

markie

  • Member
  • Posts: 13178
Re: Grammy nominations
« Reply #2 on: December 04, 2003, 04:14:00 pm »
<img src="http://www.gardengal.net/award_5.gif" alt=" - " />
 
 who really cares?
Logged

Sir HC

  • Member
  • Posts: 4059
Re: Grammy nominations
« Reply #3 on: December 04, 2003, 04:17:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Skeeter:
  Fountains of Wayne are up for "Best New Artist".
Combined with:
 
 Best Pop Performance By A Duo Or Group With Vocal
 (For established duos or groups, with vocals. Singles or Tracks only.)
 
     * Stacy's Mom
       Fountains Of Wayne
       Track from: Welcome Interstate Managers
       [S-Curve Records]
Logged

mankie

  • Guest
Re: Grammy nominations
« Reply #4 on: December 04, 2003, 04:19:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by mark e smith:
   <img src="http://www.gardengal.net/award_5.gif" alt=" - " />
 
 who really cares?
Not me!
Logged

Charlie Nakatestes, Japanese Golfer

  • Member
  • Posts: 17762
Re: Grammy nominations
« Reply #5 on: December 05, 2003, 11:57:00 am »
One of the guys who is a regular poster on the Robbie Fulks chatboard that GGW and I hang out on was nominated for a Grammy for Best Children's Music Album.
Logged

mankie

  • Guest
Re: Grammy nominations
« Reply #6 on: December 05, 2003, 12:30:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Rhett Miller:
  One of the guys who is a regular poster on the Robbie Fulks chatboard that GGW and I hang out on was nominated for a Grammy for Best Children's Music Album.
Who was it? Robbie Fulks?
Logged

Charlie Nakatestes, Japanese Golfer

  • Member
  • Posts: 17762
Re: Grammy nominations
« Reply #7 on: December 05, 2003, 02:05:00 pm »
http://www.zakmorgan.com/
 
 The guy self releases an album, and it gets nominated for a Grammy. I guess the big corporations don't control it all.
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by mankie:
   
Quote
Originally posted by Rhett Miller:
  One of the guys who is a regular poster on the Robbie Fulks chatboard that GGW and I hang out on was nominated for a Grammy for Best Children's Music Album.
Who was it? Robbie Fulks? [/b]
Logged

Mongo

  • Member
  • Posts: 267
Re: Grammy nominations
« Reply #8 on: December 05, 2003, 02:17:00 pm »
What the fuck is Fight Test by the Flaming Lips up for Best alternative ablum?  
 
 1.  It's more like an EP at only 5 songs.  
 2.  The Title track was on an album released more than a year ago.
 3.  It's really not that good.  
 
 Perhaps just a reference to Jack White will get you a Grammy nomination these days.  I like the Lips but that is one nomination that could have been given to a more deserving effort.
Logged

bearman🐻

  • Member
  • Posts: 5463
Re: Grammy nominations
« Reply #9 on: December 05, 2003, 03:51:00 pm »
I guess I'm a little surprised to see Queens of the Stone Age on there. I know "Songs for the Deaf" went gold or was just about to, but I really didn't get the impression that they were well-known in the industry. A friend of mine that worked in a mental hospital for teens tells me that QOTSA are very, very popular among the patients. Somehow that makes sense...apparently Black Sabbath is also pretty standard.
Logged

flawd101

  • Guest
Re: Grammy nominations
« Reply #10 on: December 05, 2003, 08:09:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by bunnyman:
  I guess I'm a little surprised to see Queens of the Stone Age on there. I know "Songs for the Deaf" went gold or was just about to, but I really didn't get the impression that they were well-known in the industry. A friend of mine that worked in a mental hospital for teens tells me that QOTSA are very, very popular among the patients. Somehow that makes sense...apparently Black Sabbath is also pretty standard.
are u serious?
 only a mentally challenged person whould listen to QOTSA.
 everybody should listen to sabbath....even people that shouldn't
 paraniod is probaly their song.....
 
 the grammys alway throw in a long shot that wont win....so then they look like they are reaching out to all types of music....
Logged

foxxy_gurl2004

  • Guest
Re: Grammy nominations
« Reply #11 on: December 06, 2003, 06:31:00 pm »
I like the White Stripes and Queens of the Stone Age.
 
 I hope Outkast wins some awards,that along with Coldplay.
 
 But anyway from the list nobody really interest me. I don't find any of the award shows entertaining.
Logged

flawd101

  • Guest
Re: Grammy nominations
« Reply #12 on: December 07, 2003, 04:59:00 pm »
the commies on comedy central looks like a good award show, and the video game awards on spike tv.....
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »