Author Topic: Wolfowitz to World Bank  (Read 7415 times)

HoyaSaxa03

  • Member
  • Posts: 7053
Wolfowitz to World Bank
« on: March 16, 2005, 11:22:00 am »
I'm sorry for all you development people out there ...
 
 article
(o|o)

Dr. Anton Phibes

  • Member
  • Posts: 1089
Re: Wolfowitz to World Bank
« Reply #1 on: March 16, 2005, 11:43:00 am »
In this administration you fail UPWARDS! Congrats,Paul!

Frank Gallagher

  • Member
  • Posts: 4792
Re: Wolfowitz to World Bank
« Reply #2 on: March 16, 2005, 11:46:00 am »
I thought Bono was getting that job?

Re: Wolfowitz to World Bank
« Reply #3 on: March 16, 2005, 11:50:00 am »
I thought he was pretty decent when he was a reporter on CNN. But then again, I only watched CNN when staying at hotels.
 
 Can someone remind me again why the U.S. President gets to choose the leader of the World Bank?

Fico

  • Guest
Re: Wolfowitz to World Bank
« Reply #4 on: March 16, 2005, 11:53:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by HoyaSaxa03:
  I'm sorry for all you development people out there ...
 
 article
The writing was on the wall..the Financial Times wrote about it some weeks back...I just really hoped it wouldn't happen..

Barcelona

  • Member
  • Posts: 1342
Re: Wolfowitz to World Bank
« Reply #5 on: March 16, 2005, 12:30:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Charlie Nakatestes, Japanese Golfer:
  I thought he was pretty decent when he was a reporter on CNN. But then again, I only watched CNN when staying at hotels.
 
 Can someone remind me again why the U.S. President gets to choose the leader of the World Bank?
I might be off on this but I believe Europeans choose the IMF director and the US appoints the WB director. Still, I might be completely off on this one, read it somewhere.
 
 As for Wolfowitz being the president of the WB, I think this is a disaster, but what can you expect from Bush and the far right?

Frank Gallagher

  • Member
  • Posts: 4792
Re: Wolfowitz to World Bank
« Reply #6 on: March 16, 2005, 12:36:00 pm »
I bet Rummie gets to be ambassador to Amnesty International or something.
 
 I'm still trying to figure out who's the biggest moron, Dubya himself, or those who voted for him.

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19716
Re: Wolfowitz to World Bank
« Reply #7 on: March 16, 2005, 01:23:00 pm »
Here's to hoping an American appointee doesn't get approval.  It was bound to happen once, right?
27>34

HoyaSaxa03

  • Member
  • Posts: 7053
Re: Wolfowitz to World Bank
« Reply #8 on: March 16, 2005, 01:39:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Barcelona:
   
Quote
Originally posted by Charlie Nakatestes, Japanese Golfer:
  Can someone remind me again why the U.S. President gets to choose the leader of the World Bank?
I might be off on this but I believe Europeans choose the IMF director and the US appoints the WB director. Still, I might be completely off on this one, read it somewhere.
 [/b]
yep.
(o|o)

Fico

  • Guest
Re: Wolfowitz to World Bank
« Reply #9 on: March 16, 2005, 01:43:00 pm »
it may be a wee long but it should answer any questions on the topic:
 
 Paul Wolfowitz to Be Nominated as Next World Bank President
 2005-03-16 09:24 (New York)
 
 
 By Simon Kennedy and Julie Ziegler
      March 16 (Bloomberg) -- Paul D. Wolfowitz, the Deputy
 Secretary of Defense, will be nominated to be the next head of
 the World Bank, a U.S. official said.
      President George W. Bush will name Wolfowitz later today,
 the official said. He would replace James Wolfensohn, 71, who
 said in January that he would leave the institution when his term
 ends May 31.
      Wolfowitz's nomination must be approved by all of the World
 Bank's member countries, which analysts said would be largely a
 formality. By tradition, the U.S. chooses the head of the World
 Bank, and European officials choose the managing director of the
 International Monetary Fund.
      Treasury Department spokesman Rob Nichols declined to
 comment on the nomination.
      Other candidates for the World Bank position included former
 Hewlett-Packard Co. Chief Executive Officer Carly Fiorina and
 Bush administration AIDS policy chief Randall Tobias.
      Wolfowitz was a strong advocate of the Iraq war, advocating
 the toppling of Saddam Hussein and helping the administration
 craft its rationale for the invasion. The U.S. official said
 Wolfowitz is a proven leader, intellectually and operationally.
 
                         World Bank Scope
 
      His management experience running the Pentagon, the largest
 government agency with nearly 700,000 civilian employees and 1.3
 million in uniform will serve him well at the World Bank, the
 official said.
      Responding to a report in the Financial Times earlier this
 month that Wolfowitz was a candidate for the World Bank, a
 Defense Department spokesman said he would remain at the
 Pentagon. ``Secretary Wolfowitz has been asked to stay on in an
 extremely important job, one that he likes doing very much,''
 Defense Department spokesman Larry DiRita said March 1.
      Under Wolfowitz, the Bush administration may now try to
 narrow the focus of the World Bank, returning the international
 lending institution to its roots of primarily financing large
 infrastructure projects and limiting the practice of handing out
 zero-interest loans, analysts such as Alan Meltzer, who led a
 2000 congressional inquiry into the World Bank, said.
 
                          Management Goal
 
      The lender, the largest financier of projects in developing
 nations, broadened its scope under Wolfensohn, who sought a more
 ``humanizing'' role for the bank, according to Joseph Stiglitz, a
 Nobel Prize-winning professor at Columbia University and former
 chief economist of the World Bank.
      Since taking over in 1995, Wolfensohn cut by 40 percent
 financing for dams, bridges and infrastructure projects, and
 shifted that money to programs promoting climate change and
 development.
      The U.S. is seeking to scale back some of Wolfensohn's
 projects, overhaul the bank's $20 billion a year lending
 operation and more effectively manage more than 10,000 employees
 scattered in 109 nations, Meltzer said.
      Bush named Wolfowitz, 61, as deputy to Defense Secretary
 Donald Rumsfeld in February 2001. Then dean of Johns Hopkins
 University School of Advanced International Studies, Wolfowitz
 was a veteran of both the State and Defense Departments.
 
                      State, Defense Veteran
 
       He served as undersecretary for policy for Vice President
 Dick Cheney when Cheney headed the Pentagon during the
 administration of former President George Bush, the current
 president's father.
      From 1986 to 1989, Wolfowitz was the U.S. ambassador to
 Indonesia, and assistant secretary of state for East Asian and
 Pacific Affairs from 1982 to 1986. He worked on arms control and
 disarmament issues in federal agencies in the 1970s.
      Wolfowitz was a critic of former President Bill Clinton's
 approach toward China and Russia, and urged tougher stances on
 those countries' missile transfers to Iran. He also supported
 providing international financial assistance to Indonesia during
 the Asian financial crisis, testifying before Congress that it
 served U.S. interests.
      From 1995 to 2001, Wolfowitz was a director of toy maker
 Hasbro Inc. He received a Masters degree in administration and a
 Doctorate in political science and economics from University of
 Chicago.

mustourdman

  • Guest
Re: Wolfowitz to World Bank
« Reply #10 on: March 16, 2005, 01:44:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Barcelona:
  I might be off on this but I believe Europeans choose the IMF director and the US appoints the WB director. Still, I might be completely off on this one, read it somewhere.
Yeah, that's basically right, except it's not engraved into law, just tradition. If the Europeans had a huge problem with Wolfowitz they could block him, but it would probably result in the U.S. blocking their choice to lead the IMF. Experts on NPR figured the Europeans would grudgingly accept the status quo.

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: Wolfowitz to World Bank
« Reply #11 on: March 16, 2005, 01:45:00 pm »
Why is this bad?

  • Guest
Re: Wolfowitz to World Bank
« Reply #12 on: March 16, 2005, 01:46:00 pm »
<img src="http://www.superdickery.com/images/oneshot/batman01.jpg" alt=" - " />
 
  NEWS FLASH !

sonickteam2

  • Guest
Re: Wolfowitz to World Bank
« Reply #13 on: March 16, 2005, 01:53:00 pm »
where's Rob Gee's take on this.  
 
   i figured he would weigh in , but i guess not.
 
  I'll do it for him
 
 
   "_____ insurgents _______ fuck em all _______ love Bush _____ defeat ________  my nice paying job   :D  "

Barcelona

  • Member
  • Posts: 1342
Re: Wolfowitz to World Bank
« Reply #14 on: March 16, 2005, 01:54:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
  Why is this bad?
I'm not going to get into any argument over this, but basically because the World Bank is a development agency, not a war agency. Not that the WB is a perfect institution, but to have this guy directing it might end up being a disaster. Just my opinion. Feel free to disagree and point out to articles talking about the mistakes and corruption in these types of institutions, it's just my opinion. And I believe Bush today talked about him being compassionate? here we go again. The least compassionate people on earth talking about compassion.