Originally posted by Jaguar:
Delaware is also a non-smoking state.
and the most anti-consumer pro-corporate state in the nation ... i'll take smoking over that bullshit anyday
and i like what sonick said, why does every last bar have to be non-smoking, why can't they ban smoking outright in restaurants, and come up with some kind of ratio of smoking bars to non-smoking bars, sell a certain amount of licenses to the smoking bars, and let the smokers and non-smokers figure it out? i think equating this kind of gov't regulation to the civil rights movement and 14th Amendment issues is pretty disingenous.
i'm sure most of the people hanging out in dan's cafe on a normal weekend night could give a fuck about second-hand smoke, so why not let a bar like that keep their smoking policy
just looking at this from an economic perspective, why haven't all bars and clubs gone non-smoking on their own if there is such a huge public outcry for a complete and outright ban on smoking in all bars? this question keeps being brought up and summarily shot down in these kind of debates, but i've never heard it really addressed
everyone's opinion on this topic seems to be completely self-serving and not looking at compromises or the broader picture, a truly great way to conduct public policy