Author Topic: DC Area Voters  (Read 148163 times)

manimtired

  • Member
  • Posts: 1432
Re: DC Area Voters
« Reply #195 on: February 14, 2008, 04:33:00 pm »
no..ross perot worked well for the clinton team.

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: DC Area Voters
« Reply #196 on: February 14, 2008, 04:37:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
 
Quote
Originally posted by edbert:
 [qb] Now she is having her lackeys break out the "America won't elect a black man" card.
 
  http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23134717/?GT1=10856
 
  [/b]
I agree with Ed Rendell.  There were many Republicans in PA who did not vote for Lynn Swann simply because he's black.  That's essentially what he's saying, right?
 
 What an idiot to make a parallel between Swann and Obama.  Statements like that will hurt Clinton.
27>34

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: DC Area Voters
« Reply #197 on: February 14, 2008, 04:38:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by manimtired:
  no..ross perot worked well for the clinton team.
Wrong Clinton team.  Try to keep up.
27>34

manimtired

  • Member
  • Posts: 1432
Re: DC Area Voters
« Reply #198 on: February 14, 2008, 04:45:00 pm »
you should be more clear..b/c you could say that of bill too.  try to be more clear..

manimtired

  • Member
  • Posts: 1432
Re: DC Area Voters
« Reply #199 on: February 14, 2008, 04:50:00 pm »
dammit...now it looks as if im on message with the clintons.  this is one wacky primary season.
 
 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8UQ8G3O0&show_article=1

Venerable Bede

  • Member
  • Posts: 3863
Re: DC Area Voters
« Reply #200 on: February 14, 2008, 04:57:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by vansmack:
   
Quote
Originally posted by manimtired:
  god i hope youre joking..the man is a bloated bag of empty rhetoric.
I hope the Republicans underestimate him the same way that you are.
 [/b]
i think you mean misunderestimate. . .republicans are still strategerizing
OU812

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: DC Area Voters
« Reply #201 on: February 14, 2008, 05:01:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by manimtired:
  you should be more clear..b/c you could say that of bill too.  try to be more clear..
You're right, I should be more clear because the Bill Clinton team likely underestimated Obama when he was running for head of the Harvard Law Review.  Bill likely had someone else in mind.
 
 Maybe you should take a deep breath before posting something negative about the Dem race at every opportunity you get just so you get things a little more clearly.  
 
 We get it - you don't like the Dems.  How about some thoughtful analysis rather than thoughtless one-off comments?  I'm sure my conservative friends (a couple of whom are on this board) will tell you that I'm capable of many thorough conversations about political differences that enlighten them sometimes, at least as much as they enlighten me.
27>34

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: DC Area Voters
« Reply #202 on: February 14, 2008, 05:03:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Venerable Bede:
  i think you mean misunderestimate. . .republicans are still strategerizing
See manimtired, this is the thoughtful analysis I was talking about...
27>34

manimtired

  • Member
  • Posts: 1432
Re: DC Area Voters
« Reply #203 on: February 14, 2008, 05:03:00 pm »
or your ever so smart comment is a perfect analogy to the opinion that republicans underestimated bill and thus lost the election to bush sr....stfu

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: DC Area Voters
« Reply #204 on: February 14, 2008, 05:17:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by manimtired:
  or your ever so smart comment is a perfect analogy to the opinion that republicans underestimated bill and thus lost the election to bush sr.
<img src="http://buffalogeek.wnymedia.net/blogs/files/2007/10/james_carville1.jpg" alt=" - " />
 
 James Carville Knows why...
 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It's_the_economy,_stupid
27>34

Mobius

  • Member
  • Posts: 1289
Re: DC Area Voters
« Reply #205 on: February 14, 2008, 05:53:00 pm »
Quote
[/qb]
god i hope youre joking..the man is a bloated bag of empty rhetoric. [/QB][/QUOTE]
 
 Not joking.  Obviously.  I don't find his rhetoric empty at all because it articulates a spirit I see and I think is real in America today.  Obama is isn't inventing it, he's personifying it.  
 
 That's America baby.   What resonates with some, doesn't with others.

eros

  • Member
  • Posts: 1111
Re: DC Area Voters
« Reply #206 on: February 14, 2008, 06:27:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Mobius:
 Not joking.  Obviously.  I don't find his rhetoric empty at all because it articulates a spirit I see and I think is real in America today.  Obama is isn't inventing it, he's personifying it.  
 
 That's America baby.   What resonates with some, doesn't with others.
Right.  For the most part (there are of course exceptions), the president's policies don't have as much of an effect on your day to day life as the policies of your state and local government.
 
 If Obama can surround himself with the right people and give good speeches that make me feel hopeful about things, then that's good enough for me right now.
ʎɐʍou

beetsnotbeats

  • Member
  • Posts: 1181
Re: DC Area Voters
« Reply #207 on: February 14, 2008, 07:09:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
  The reemergence of the assassination card can't be far behind.
Who needs the Clinton campaign to do that when you can get a Nobel laureate to do it for you.

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: DC Area Voters
« Reply #208 on: February 18, 2008, 03:42:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by pdx pollard:
  He could probably find a woman running mate who would not alienate the base as much as Snowe would, I am not sure who it would be, but I don't see it being Snowe.
Whipsers over the weekend of a possible female running mate:
 
 Kay Bailey Hutchinson
27>34

Venerable Bede

  • Member
  • Posts: 3863
Re: DC Area Voters
« Reply #209 on: February 19, 2008, 05:10:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by vansmack:
   
Quote
Originally posted by pdx pollard:
  He could probably find a woman running mate who would not alienate the base as much as Snowe would, I am not sure who it would be, but I don't see it being Snowe.
Whipsers over the weekend of a possible female running mate:
 
 Kay Bailey Hutchinson [/b]
hasn't she been "mentioned" since bush the elder?  i know that sarah palin is one that the blogs would like.
OU812