Author Topic: DC Area Voters  (Read 142353 times)

Frank Gallagher

  • Member
  • Posts: 4792
Re: DC Area Voters
« Reply #675 on: March 19, 2008, 04:39:00 pm »
I thought as much, which is why I only posted total goals not actual scores.
 
 Anyhooo...what's the deal on white shoes?
 
 It seems to be if you're a NY'er snowbird then you wear dress shoes and no socks, yet you still wear your vest under your polo shirt. I mean come one...you're either cold or you're not!!!! And don't get me started on belts with yachts and/or ducks emboidered on them.

ratioci nation

  • Member
  • Posts: 4463
Re: DC Area Voters
« Reply #676 on: March 19, 2008, 05:26:00 pm »
<img src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_Tnian1ZYw1o/R-CONGmjanI/AAAAAAAABco/ITpF6gxXsf4/s1600-h/ads.jpg" alt=" - " />

Frank Gallagher

  • Member
  • Posts: 4792
Re: DC Area Voters
« Reply #677 on: March 19, 2008, 05:40:00 pm »
On the subject of selecting the wrong ass-hole!!!
 
 
  http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,339270,00.html

Frank Gallagher

  • Member
  • Posts: 4792
Re: DC Area Voters
« Reply #678 on: March 19, 2008, 05:43:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by vansmack:
     
Quote
Originally posted by 47 YEAR OLD VIRGIN:
  There's been 40 minutes of premiership football and 5 goals, looks like we're in for a fun evening.
 
 I thought it was only white belts during summer months. Or is that just down here in the south?
I can't watch both matches so if we could refrain from specifics about the Spurs/Chelsea match I'd appreciate it (but my fantasy team is sure to be doing well with Ronaldo, Anelka and Keane).
 
 And it's white pants between memorial day and labor day, not white belts. [/b]
8 goal night and still counting!!!
 
 *edit* make that 9!!!
 
 *edit* 10

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: DC Area Voters
« Reply #679 on: March 19, 2008, 06:06:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by 47 YEAR OLD VIRGIN:
  8 goal night and still counting!!!
 
 *edit* make that 9!!!
 
 *edit* 10
Geeezzzzuuzzz
27>34

Sage 703

  • Member
  • Posts: 1710
Re: DC Area Voters
« Reply #680 on: March 20, 2008, 03:44:00 pm »
Hillary Clinton, liar:
 
 http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat?pid=300860
 
 
 Clinton Lie Kills Her Credibility on Trade Policy
    
 What is the proper word for the claim by Hillary Clinton and the more factually disinclined supporters of her campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination -- made in speeches, briefings and interviews (including one by this reporter with the candidate) -- that she has always been a critic of the North American Free Trade Agreement?
 
 Now that we know from the 11,000 pages of Clinton White House documents released this week that former First Lady was an ardent advocate for NAFTA; now that we know she held at least five meetings to strategize about how to win congressional approval of the deal; now that we know she was in the thick of the manuevering to block the efforts of labor, farm, environmental and human rights groups to get a better agreement. Now that we know all of this, how should we assess the claim that Hillary's heart has always beaten to a fair-trade rhythm?
 
 Now that we know from official records of her time as First Lady that Clinton was the featured speaker at a closed-door session where 120 women opinion leaders were hectored to pressure their congressional representatives to approve NAFTA; now that we know from ABC News reporting on the session that "her remarks were totally pro-NAFTA" and that "there was no equivocation for her support for NAFTA at the time;" now that we have these details confirmed, what should we make of Clinton's campaign claim that she was never comfortable with the militant free-trade agenda that has cost the United States hundreds of thousands of union jobs, that has idled entire industries, that has saddled this country with record trade deficits, undermined the security of working families in the US and abroad, and has forced Mexican farmers off their land into an economic refugee status that ultimately forces them to cross the Rio Grande River in search of work?
 
 As she campaigns now, Clinton says, "I have been a critic of NAFTA from the very beginning."
 
 But the White House records confirm that this is not true.
 
 Her statement is, to be precise, a lie.
 
 When it comes to the essential test of the trade debate, Clinton has been identified as a liar -- a put-in-boldface-type "L-I-A-R" liar.
 
 Those of us who covered the 1993 NAFTA debate have frequently expressed doubts about the former First Lady's recent statements. We never heard anything at the time about her dissenting from the Clinton Administration line on trade policy. And we knew that she had defended NAFTA in the years following its enactment. But fairness required that we at least entertain that notion--promoted by the lamentable David Gergen, himself a champion of free-trade policies while working in the Clinton White House--that Hillary Clinton had been a behind-the-scenes critic. We had to at least consider the possibility that, at the very least, Clinton had been worried that advancing NAFTA would trip up her advocacy for health care reform, that she had made her concerns known and that she had absented herself from pro-NAFTA lobbying.
 
 This was certainly the impression that Clinton and her supporters sought to create as she campaigned in Wisconsin, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Indiana--states where worried workers want to know exactly where the candidates have stood and currently stand with regard to trade issues.
 
 But that impression was a deliberate deception.
 
 And we must all now recognize that when Hillary Clinton speaks about trade policy, she begins with a lie so blatant--that she's been "a critic of NAFTA from the very beginning"--that everything else she says must be viewed as suspect.

Frank Gallagher

  • Member
  • Posts: 4792
Re: DC Area Voters
« Reply #681 on: March 21, 2008, 09:09:00 am »
blah blah blah...at least she's not a racist wahabi muslim!!!
 
   ;)

nkotb

  • Member
  • Posts: 6110
Re: DC Area Voters
« Reply #682 on: March 21, 2008, 09:33:00 am »
She might not be, but...
 
   ;)  [/b][/quote]

Re: DC Area Voters
« Reply #683 on: March 21, 2008, 09:39:00 am »
Who here considers themselves to be a "typical white person"?

Frank Gallagher

  • Member
  • Posts: 4792
Re: DC Area Voters
« Reply #684 on: March 21, 2008, 09:59:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by Charlie Nakatestes,Japanese Golfer:
  Who here considers themselves to be a "typical white person"?
I guess we all are according to Barack Hussein Obama, who obviously is not your typical black person.

godsshoeshine

  • Member
  • Posts: 4826
Re: DC Area Voters
« Reply #685 on: March 21, 2008, 10:13:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by Charlie Nakatestes,Japanese Golfer:
  Who here considers themselves to be a "typical white person"?
i like 55 of 90 on stuff white people like. pretty average?
o/\o

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: DC Area Voters
« Reply #686 on: March 21, 2008, 11:09:00 am »
Richardson endorses Obama
 
 Hispanic governor says presidential hopeful a 'once-in-a-lifetime leader'
 
 The Associated Press
 updated 9:02 a.m. ET, Fri., March. 21, 2008
 SANTA FE, New Mexico - New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, the nation's only Hispanic governor, is endorsing Sen. Barack Obama for president, calling him a "once-in-a- lifetime leader" who can unite the nation and restore America's international leadership.
 
 Richardson, who dropped out of the Democratic race in January, is to appear with Obama on Friday at a campaign event in Portland, Ore., The Associated Press has learned.
 
 The governor's endorsement comes as Obama leads among delegates selected at primaries and caucuses but with national public opinion polling showing Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton pulling ahead of him amid controversy over statements by his former pastor.
 
 Richardson has been relentlessly wooed by Obama and Clinton for his endorsement. As a Democratic superdelegate, the governor plays a part in the tight race for nominating votes and could bring other superdelegates to Obama's side. He also has been mentioned as a potential running mate for either candidate.
 
 No primaries are scheduled until Pennsylvania's on April 22, a gap in time Obama hopes to use for such announcements to assert that he is the front-runner for the nomination.
 
 'Once-in-a-lifetime leader'
 "I believe he is the kind of once-in-a-lifetime leader that can bring our nation together and restore America's moral leadership in the world," Richardson said in a statement obtained by the AP. "As a presidential candidate, I know full well Sen. Obama's unique moral ability to inspire the American people to confront our urgent challenges at home and abroad in a spirit of bipartisanship and reconciliation."
 
 Richardson's endorsement also could help Obama pick up support among Hispanics, who are the nation's largest and fastest-growing minority.
 
 Clinton has been the favorite of Hispanics in primaries and caucuses, according to exit polls. She won the New Mexico caucus in early February with a nearly 2-to-1 advantage among Hispanics.
 
 Richardson backed Obama despite his ties to Clinton and her husband, the former president. He served as ambassador to the U.N. and as secretary of the Energy Department during the Clinton administration. Last month, Richardson and former President Clinton watched the Super Bowl together at the governor's residence in Santa Fe.
 
 Clinton a 'distinguished leader'
 Richardson praised Hillary Clinton as a "distinguished leader with vast experience." But the governor said Obama "will be a historic and great president, who can bring us the change we so desperately need by bringing us together as a nation here at home and with our allies abroad."
 
 Richardson was a roving diplomatic troubleshooter when he was a congressman from New Mexico, negotiating the release of U.S. hostages in several countries and meeting with a rogue's gallery of U.S. adversaries, including Saddam Hussein and Fidel Castro.
 
 "There is no doubt in my mind that Barack Obama has the judgment and courage we need in a commander in chief when our nation's security is on the line. He showed this judgment by opposing the Iraq war from the start, and he has show it during this campaign by standing up for a new era in American leadership internationally," Richardson said.
 
 Obama said he was "deeply honored" to have Richardson's support.
 
 "Whether it's fighting to end the Iraq war or stop the genocide in Darfur or prevent nuclear weapons from falling into the hands of terrorists, Gov. Richardson has been a powerful voice on issues of global security, peace and justice, earning five Nobel Peace Prize nominations," Obama said in a statement.

manimtired

  • Member
  • Posts: 1432
Re: DC Area Voters
« Reply #687 on: March 21, 2008, 11:12:00 am »
i honestly used to want the repubs to have to take on hillary in the general election.  now i want obama...this is coming from a typical white person.

Frank Gallagher

  • Member
  • Posts: 4792
Re: DC Area Voters
« Reply #688 on: March 21, 2008, 11:17:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by manimtired:
  i honestly used to want the repubs to have to take on hillary in the general election.  now i want obama...this is coming from a typical white person.
The repubs are with you on that one.

Sage 703

  • Member
  • Posts: 1710
Re: DC Area Voters
« Reply #689 on: March 21, 2008, 11:18:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
  Richardson endorses Obama
 
 Hispanic governor says presidential hopeful a 'once-in-a-lifetime leader'
 
I think this could be the beginning of a slew of party leaders announcing support, to avoid a total clusterfuck disaster in Michigan and Florida.