Okay, I'm trying to see your point of view. Now, because you're articulate and old enuf to remember the events, how do you defend "All the President's Men" and the actions of Richard Nixon? One egregious action by Felts DOES NOT IMHO forgive or explain sufficiently the entire break-in/cover-up/political espionage perpetrated by an INCUMBENT President.
How would the full disclosure of events EVER have emerged? "Ken Starr" (i.e., Sam Ervin) investigating for twenty years with no final resolution? By then, the Nixon Library would have been finished and his administration totally glorified. BTW: Buchanan attributes Felt with thousands of deaths in Vietnam...of course, Matt Lauer then interrupts so we never hear Pat's reasoning...this is SOOO weird after all these years!