Author Topic: 2009 MLB Playoffs Thread  (Read 21759 times)

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
2009 MLB Playoffs Thread
« on: October 07, 2009, 07:39:35 pm »
I'll be shocked if we see a better game than last night's DET-MINN playoff game, but we can hope.

Usually I write some 15 paragraph diatribe about why this Angel team will shed the Red Sox in the first round, but I can only be wrong so many times.  I will say this though - all of the Red Sox fans I know are WAY too overconfident about "it's only Anaheim - we own Anaheim!" and making their date with NY.  The baseball gods will chortle.

PREDICTIONS

AL

Anaheim in 5
Yankees in 4

NL

Phillies in 3
Cardinals in 4

27>34

renton007

  • Member
  • Posts: 305
Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs Thread
« Reply #1 on: October 08, 2009, 08:29:58 am »
Cliff Lee was the man yesterday. I love watching pitcher complete a game. I thought they might pull him in the ninth but he powered through.  The wind seemed to affect the Rockies more than the Phillies. Good luck for them I guess. I hope Hamels is back to 2008 form for today. At least its not going to be a Rockies sweep like 2007.

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs Thread
« Reply #2 on: October 08, 2009, 01:16:42 pm »
Yep, Cliff Lee was a man last night.  I was shocked the Dodgers were able to rough Carp up last night.  He had dominated them all season (all of his career actually).
27>34

saco

  • Member
  • Posts: 446
Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs Thread
« Reply #3 on: October 08, 2009, 03:54:55 pm »
This Sawx fan is not overconfident.  Not sure who these friends are, but they probably havent watched many Sox games vs teams with half decent starting pitching.   Good luck tonight and all weekend. 

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 21786
  • I don't belong here.
Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs Thread
« Reply #4 on: October 08, 2009, 05:52:31 pm »
This Sawx fan is not overconfident.  Not sure who these friends are, but they probably havent watched many Sox games vs teams with half decent starting pitching.  

agreed.  none of my sawx-luvin' friends are expecting a cake-walk. 
<sig>

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 21786
  • I don't belong here.
Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs Thread
« Reply #5 on: October 08, 2009, 07:09:16 pm »
Oddsmakers pick Yanks, Cards Series

LAS VEGAS -- Oddsmakers in Las Vegas have picked the New York Yankees and the St. Louis Cardinals as favorites to meet in the World Series and think New York has an overwhelming chance to win its first title since 2000.
(...)

Las Vegas Sports Consultants set World Series odds for Boston at 9-2 and the Angels at 11-2, and Rood said public support has been behind Los Angeles, despite the Angels losing 12 of their last 13 postseason games against the Red Sox dating to 1986.

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/playoffs/2009/news/story?id=4540329
<sig>

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 21786
  • I don't belong here.
Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs Thread
« Reply #6 on: October 08, 2009, 11:48:49 pm »
that first base ump should not be allowed to officiate another game.  he's either been bought off, or is blind.

<cue smackie with a legalistic, could-happen-to-anyone excuse>
<sig>

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs Thread
« Reply #7 on: October 09, 2009, 01:55:30 am »
that first base ump should not be allowed to officiate another game.  he's either been bought off, or is blind.

<cue smackie with a legalistic, could-happen-to-anyone excuse>

I was waiting for this.  Boston manages 4 hits all game and CJ Buckner will be the talk of Boston radio tomorrow...good - the fans can focus on Buckner and not the fact that their team was flatout outplayed.

He didn't cost Boston any runs....nor did he gift Anaheim any runs (Kendrick did not score either time).  But yes, those calls were atrocious.  Neither was close AT ALL...

The only call that cost a run was calling Hunter out at third in the 7th (I thought he was safe), but then again I'm not at all upset about a 5-0 vs 6-0 game - a shutout is a shutout.

Nonetheless, I have three words of advice: LEARN TO THROW
27>34

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 21786
  • I don't belong here.
Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs Thread
« Reply #8 on: October 09, 2009, 02:21:09 am »
there is no question, boston was out-played.  lester started out fine but lost steam as the innings went on.  re: LEARN TO THROW, no kidding.  that was some horrible defense on the sawx's part.  had the throw to first been a little more on target there would have been no room for buckner's bad call.  and while those calls didn't directly result in runs being scored, i'm sure they bugged (i.e. distracted) the sawx to no end.  after those calls, do you think youkilis went back to the dugout with his head in the game?  of course not.  not an immediate game-changer, but no team would ask to have those distractions thrown at them.

good game on the angel's part.  lackey isn't as flashy a pitcher as lester, but ultimately he was much more effective.  i know which quality i'd rather have right now.
<sig>

blinkboy

  • Member
  • Posts: 60
Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs Thread
« Reply #9 on: October 09, 2009, 08:22:35 am »
that first base ump should not be allowed to officiate another game.  he's either been bought off, or is blind.

<cue smackie with a legalistic, could-happen-to-anyone excuse>

I was waiting for this.  Boston manages 4 hits all game and CJ Buckner will be the talk of Boston radio tomorrow...good - the fans can focus on Buckner and not the fact that their team was flatout outplayed.

He didn't cost Boston any runs....nor did he gift Anaheim any runs (Kendrick did not score either time).  But yes, those calls were atrocious.  Neither was close AT ALL...

The only call that cost a run was calling Hunter out at third in the 7th (I thought he was safe), but then again I'm not at all upset about a 5-0 vs 6-0 game - a shutout is a shutout.

Nonetheless, I have three words of advice: LEARN TO THROW


  while i i agree with the points of poor throws and that it didnt "technically" cost him more than one run.  you can't deny it changes the whole outcome of the game. Firstly, Abreu struck out before that ever happened, but that beautiful pitch was called a ball. so Lester  has to pitch to one extra batter. Then the first Kendrick incident allows Hunter to be at bat with 2-men on.
   I counted three complete crap calls. and a) everyone who knows me knows that i NEVER complain about officiating. (that second call was the worset i may have ever seen and b) if those calls had been the other way, Angels fans would have been bitching and smackie, you'd be agreeing, so dont forget!

   series has just begun! and we dont get shut out twice in a row!

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs Thread
« Reply #10 on: October 09, 2009, 12:05:25 pm »
after those calls, do you think youkilis went back to the dugout with his head in the game?  of course not.  not an immediate game-changer, but no team would ask to have those distractions thrown at them.

Maybe the Red sox shouldn't have traded Manny since he was the only one that would beat up Youk when he gets in one of his "moods."  Oh wait, that's just how he is.  He's a head case and maybe he was already upset that he was 0-2 with a strikeout by the time the first bad call happened?  What's your excuse for that?

By the time the second bad call happened it was already 3-0 and the Sox were being badly outplayed.  How 'bout you guys start complaining that they didn't gut it out when faced with adversity?  Where's the "Cowboy up" when you need it?
27>34

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs Thread
« Reply #11 on: October 09, 2009, 12:19:09 pm »
  while i i agree with the points of poor throws and that it didnt "technically" cost him more than one run.  you can't deny it changes the whole outcome of the game.

The Hunter call cost the Angels a run, not the Red Sox.  Kendrick did not score either time.


Firstly, Abreu struck out before that ever happened, but that beautiful pitch was called a ball. so Lester  has to pitch to one extra batter. Then the first Kendrick incident allows Hunter to be at bat with 2-men on.

Wrong wrong wrong wrong.  So by going by your ridiculous apologist theory, the bad call in the third was so disruptive to the team, it meant that Mathis does not bat until the fourth.  So he strikes out.  Aybar doubles, figgy sacrifices, and THEN the strikeout should have been called, thus ending the inning?  How ridiculously apologistic can we be here?  The only thing worse than CB Buckners eyes is TBS pitch Track.  It's been off in every playoff game.  They shold just get rid of it.  Anyhow, fine I'll go with your theory, Abreu strikes out.  Hunter bats in the top of the 5th, hits a solo shot and the Angels win 1-0.  Are you happy now?  The Angels tack on two more and it ends 3-0.  It doesn't change the fact that THE RED SOX MANAGED 4 HITS.  It wasn't CB Buckner or the poor defense, it was the utterlack of offense.  They were mystified by Lackey and a 40 year old Darren Oliver.  Get over it.

   I counted three complete crap calls. and a) everyone who knows me knows that i NEVER complain about officiating. (that second call was the worset i may have ever seen and b) if those calls had been the other way, Angels fans would have been bitching and smackie, you'd be agreeing, so dont forget!

First off, nobody knows you - you've got 9 posts.  Second you don't know smackie - check last years playoff hockey thread if you want to know how smackie deals with bad calls.


   series has just begun! and we dont get shut out twice in a row!

Good luck the rest of the way.
27>34

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs Thread
« Reply #12 on: October 09, 2009, 12:23:51 pm »
BTW - I'm shocked that we're 6 posts into this and not one post on Matt Holliday trying to use his cup to catch a ball costing his team the game and probably the series....
27>34

blinkboy

  • Member
  • Posts: 60
Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs Thread
« Reply #13 on: October 09, 2009, 12:38:12 pm »
  while i i agree with the points of poor throws and that it didnt "technically" cost him more than one run.  you can't deny it changes the whole outcome of the game.

The Hunter call cost the Angels a run, not the Red Sox.  Kendrick did not score either time.


Firstly, Abreu struck out before that ever happened, but that beautiful pitch was called a ball. so Lester  has to pitch to one extra batter. Then the first Kendrick incident allows Hunter to be at bat with 2-men on.

Wrong wrong wrong wrong.  So by going by your ridiculous apologist theory, the bad call in the third was so disruptive to the team, it meant that Mathis does not bat until the fourth.  So he strikes out.  Aybar doubles, figgy sacrifices, and THEN the strikeout should have been called, thus ending the inning?  How ridiculously apologistic can we be here?  The only thing worse than CB Buckners eyes is TBS pitch Track.  It's been off in every playoff game.  They shold just get rid of it.  Anyhow, fine I'll go with your theory, Abreu strikes out.  Hunter bats in the top of the 5th, hits a solo shot and the Angels win 1-0.  Are you happy now?  The Angels tack on two more and it ends 3-0.  It doesn't change the fact that THE RED SOX MANAGED 4 HITS.  It wasn't CB Buckner or the poor defense, it was the utterlack of offense.  They were mystified by Lackey and a 40 year old Darren Oliver.  Get over it.

   I counted three complete crap calls. and a) everyone who knows me knows that i NEVER complain about officiating. (that second call was the worset i may have ever seen and b) if those calls had been the other way, Angels fans would have been bitching and smackie, you'd be agreeing, so dont forget!

First off, nobody knows you - you've got 9 posts.  Second you don't know smackie - check last years playoff hockey thread if you want to know how smackie deals with bad calls.


   series has just begun! and we dont get shut out twice in a row!

Good luck the rest of the way.


you know me smackie. its your favourite red sox fan.

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs Thread
« Reply #14 on: October 09, 2009, 12:39:40 pm »
you know me smackie. its your favourite red sox fan.

Hahaha, that's fucking great!
27>34