This is all theoretical of course.
But say a household wanted more than two tickets. The only way to get more than two was for each additional person (beyond the first) ordering would be to put in a fake address (wouldn't even have to be a work address, as Shadrach suggested, because why would you need to put in a real address if you chose print at home tickets...are they going to physically mail the link to you?). Hence, you're lying about your address and therefore are being dishonest.
Follow?
yeah, i now get your point... don't really agree with it, tho.
what you're saying amounts to a tautology: only cheaters are able to circumvent the system. isn't that always the case? dishonest people will always find a way to benefit from any system, flawed or not.
every system has flaws. name me one that doesn't. going back to the old system (allowing anyone to order 8 anonymous hard tickets, aka scalper's delight) isn't going to make thing better - we'd have trouble getting even 2 tickets!
a flaw doesn't invalidate the system, IMO. overall i suspect that this system will be very effective in preventing scalping. there is an argument to be made that they've gone too far and have made it too restrictive, not that i feel that way (then again, i only wanted 2 tickets so my needs were served. i recognize that had i needed more, i might not be such a fan).