Author Topic: Multiple men's fashion fails  (Read 8846 times)

Thousand Made-Up Loves

  • Member
  • Posts: 1266
Re: Multiple men's fashion fails
« Reply #45 on: March 09, 2018, 01:25:03 pm »
And also, the socks match the "slacks" comment is hilraious in 2018.

Great thread, forgot I even made this post.

And of course, it's still accurate. It's almost as bad as guys not matching their shoes and belts. Who dresses you?

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 18122
Re: Multiple men's fashion fails
« Reply #46 on: March 09, 2018, 02:23:05 pm »
Great thread, forgot I even made this post.

And of course, it's still accurate.

This ship has sailed and for a couple years now, colorful socks have far outpaced colorful slacks.  Thankfully.

It's almost as bad as guys not matching their shoes and belts. Who dresses you?

This one I will absolutely agree with. Unless it's a white belt.
27>34

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 15307
  • I don't belong here.
Re: Multiple men's fashion fails
« Reply #47 on: March 16, 2018, 07:55:45 pm »

Do people on here--like the elder folk, like sweet cell, like van smack, like Julian, like whoever the hell else I'm forgetting--think about the old people and wonder if they still look here, if they still peruse what we're talking about in 2018, if they're still wishing they could type and could post but they feel it's over, that the time has come when it should stop and what are they doing and why aren't they doing it and what's going on?

first, i resent being called "elder".  i think.  dunno.  and get off my lawn.

anyways, smakie goes and posts this:

Speaking of non-transferable, what's up with all those Super Excellent seats on Stubhub for this show?


Because, ChokeyChicken is real.

which answer the question: no, i don't often think about past regulars.
<sig>

walkonbyeeeeeeeee

  • Member
  • Posts: 363
Re: Multiple men's fashion fails
« Reply #48 on: March 18, 2018, 02:57:45 am »
I, like to think of them.  And elder . . . means power, and one to look up to.

Gurl.