Yet, they have Mike Trout and are 9 under............ What's the arguement? Nats are better because of their entire pitching rotation, yet the Angels are better because they have Mike Trout?
Mike Trout > Stras, Gio, JZimm, Haren, and Detwiler? Really?
It was a joke, but your deductive reasoning skills still leave something to be desired.
The Angels would be better with Stras, Gio and JZimm (haha, you said Haren....$13M for 4-5 and an ERA over 5.00
in the NL - that's the only thing Anaheim got right in the off season).
The Nats would be better with Trout, because only Miguel Cabrera is a better hitter than Mike Trout.
That's all that joke was implying.