Author Topic: Musicological banter  (Read 1150988 times)

Unsanity

  • Member
  • Posts: 1077
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #285 on: October 19, 2013, 03:13:40 am »
Any recommendations on where to start in the Goblin discography?  Looks like i need to play a little catch on their 35+ year career. I had seen the name mentioned, but looked them up when Calibro 35 were compared to them.  And they seem right up my alley...

I first got into Goblin by watching the movie "Suspiria" Then checked out the soundtrack by them. That's as good a place as any to start. Then Proceed to listen to albums like "Roller" and "Il fantastico viaggio del bagarozzo Mark" then perhaps check out more soundtracks "Dawn of The Dead"

kosmo vinyl

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 15208
    • Hi-Fi Pop
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #286 on: October 21, 2013, 03:17:45 pm »
Thanks for the Goblin tips!  Calibro 35 are worth checking out for their Italian soundtrack inspired funk.

Found out today Idlewild are back in the studio!!!!
T.Rex

Got Haggis?

  • Member
  • Posts: 2010
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #287 on: October 21, 2013, 03:36:38 pm »
i don't know where else to put this but

that nine inch nails show friday night was fucking incredible

godspeed were also great - it was crazy watching their projectionist dude live mix 6 old school film projectors with film splices

nine inch nails stage show is the best use of tech ever in a stage show imho...its mind boggling

edit: oh yeah, he gave a shoutout to the 930 club....said the first time they played dc was at the old 930 club opening up for skinny puppy
« Last Edit: October 21, 2013, 08:41:55 pm by Got Haggis? »

K8teebug

  • Member
  • Posts: 4124
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #288 on: October 23, 2013, 10:16:56 am »
i don't know where else to put this but

that nine inch nails show friday night was fucking incredible

godspeed were also great - it was crazy watching their projectionist dude live mix 6 old school film projectors with film splices

nine inch nails stage show is the best use of tech ever in a stage show imho...its mind boggling

edit: oh yeah, he gave a shoutout to the 930 club....said the first time they played dc was at the old 930 club opening up for skinny puppy


So glad to hear it!  I'm sad I missed it.  I love NIN's stage setup.  And Trent Reznor's arms.

killsaly

  • Guest
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #289 on: October 23, 2013, 10:57:43 am »
http://musicfeeds.com.au/news/engineer-turns-hardcore-band-into-edm-nightmare-after-they-fail-to-pay/
If you are in a band, you have to pay people for the work they do in support of you! Or this happens...

killsaly

  • Guest
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #290 on: October 23, 2013, 01:03:33 pm »
http://adhoc.fm/post/first-residents-ultimate-box-set-sold/
The Residents sold their first $100,000 Ultimate Box Set.

bearman🐻

  • Member
  • Posts: 5461
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #291 on: October 23, 2013, 04:56:33 pm »
i don't know where else to put this but

that nine inch nails show friday night was fucking incredible

godspeed were also great - it was crazy watching their projectionist dude live mix 6 old school film projectors with film splices

nine inch nails stage show is the best use of tech ever in a stage show imho...its mind boggling

edit: oh yeah, he gave a shoutout to the 930 club....said the first time they played dc was at the old 930 club opening up for skinny puppy


I concur. To me that show felt like an hour long. It went by so fast. Absolutely stunningly beautiful.

killsaly

  • Guest
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #292 on: October 25, 2013, 01:47:00 pm »

hutch

  • Guest
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #293 on: October 25, 2013, 01:57:29 pm »
http://pitchforkreviewgenerator.com/



pitchfork is so awful..they don't get it..they don't get ROCK AND ROLL. ..they just dont... all you have to do is read their reviews of the hellacopters to see they don't get it.

atomic

  • Member
  • Posts: 2093
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #294 on: October 25, 2013, 02:13:29 pm »
http://pitchforkreviewgenerator.com/



pitchfork is so awful..they don't get it..they don't get ROCK AND ROLL. ..they just dont... all you have to do is read their reviews of the hellacopters to see they don't get it.

Or their reviews of Coldplay and Muse. 

hutch

  • Guest
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #295 on: October 25, 2013, 02:22:44 pm »
http://pitchforkreviewgenerator.com/



pitchfork is so awful..they don't get it..they don't get ROCK AND ROLL. ..they just dont... all you have to do is read their reviews of the hellacopters to see they don't get it.

Or their reviews of Coldplay and Muse. 

if coldplay is rock and roll i'm sherlock holmes..

James Ford

  • Member
  • Posts: 5620
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #296 on: October 25, 2013, 02:33:08 pm »
And if Muse is any good, then I'm James Ford.

http://pitchforkreviewgenerator.com/



pitchfork is so awful..they don't get it..they don't get ROCK AND ROLL. ..they just dont... all you have to do is read their reviews of the hellacopters to see they don't get it.

Or their reviews of Coldplay and Muse. 

if coldplay is rock and roll i'm sherlock holmes..


hutch

  • Guest
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #297 on: October 25, 2013, 02:56:37 pm »
I was embarassed for Pitchfork reading their reviews of the Hellacopters... they didn't even bother to review High Visibility which is the greatest rock and roll record of the past 15 years..

my conclusion was modern music,, what largely passes for rock and roll, is for pussies...it is such fey weak shit..

here you have Hellacopters record this amazing vintage rock and roll record...

accordign to the pitchfork's of the world if you recorded something as good as ACDC's Back in Black it wouldn't matter because it wouldn't get past their fucked up sense of what good music is.

disgraceful..

i am so angry i better get off the internets..

hutch

  • Guest
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #298 on: October 25, 2013, 02:57:32 pm »
And if Muse is any good, then I'm James Ford.

http://pitchforkreviewgenerator.com/



pitchfork is so awful..they don't get it..they don't get ROCK AND ROLL. ..they just dont... all you have to do is read their reviews of the hellacopters to see they don't get it.

Or their reviews of Coldplay and Muse. 

if coldplay is rock and roll i'm sherlock holmes..


but you're not, right?

i mean your name is not james ford.. is that what you're saying dude? i want to be in on your joke mahn..can you help me?

James Ford

  • Member
  • Posts: 5620
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #299 on: October 25, 2013, 03:07:22 pm »
My name is not James Ford. Is your name really Hutch? I though we both got our names from tv characters.

I don't really get the appeal of Muse. But then again, I'm not really a rock kind of guy to begin with.

Though I do agree with your assessments of pitchfork, and I do think that 99% of indie rock is total garbage.

Don't get angry, it's just music.

And if Muse is any good, then I'm James Ford.

http://pitchforkreviewgenerator.com/



pitchfork is so awful..they don't get it..they don't get ROCK AND ROLL. ..they just dont... all you have to do is read their reviews of the hellacopters to see they don't get it.

Or their reviews of Coldplay and Muse. 

if coldplay is rock and roll i'm sherlock holmes..


but you're not, right?

i mean your name is not james ford.. is that what you're saying dude? i want to be in on your joke mahn..can you help me?