Author Topic: Musicological banter  (Read 1151832 times)

kosmo vinyl

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 15209
    • Hi-Fi Pop
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1035 on: November 13, 2014, 10:52:47 am »
List fail no Big Star or Love here
T.Rex

Julian, Bespoke SEXPERT

  • Member
  • Posts: 28932
  • 11x MVP, 1st Posts, HoF, Certified Weblebrity
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1036 on: November 13, 2014, 11:21:40 am »
Illinois - Sufjan Stevens
...
De-Loused in the Comatorium - The Mars Volta
Lateralus - Tool
There's filler galore on Illinois, and the second two I highlighted are hysterically terrible records.
LVMH

Unsanity

  • Member
  • Posts: 1077
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1037 on: November 14, 2014, 04:00:15 am »
Nah man...De-Loused is awesome if you are into that kind of thing. Its ear grating to almost everyone I know. They can't stand any of it not even for a minute. But to a small contingent this is one of the best albums of the last 15 years.

I cannot comment on Tool though. I don't know if I ever heard anything other than the singles from it.


azaghal1981

  • Member
  • Posts: 12034
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1039 on: November 17, 2014, 10:46:01 pm »
That industry middle man he says is no more is still there. It's taken the form of the PR industry rather than the record industry. Music doesn't randomly find its way from Bandcamp to Pitchfork. It's a nice thought but no. Yes, it's cheaper/easier to get your music out there than ever before but it's just as easy/cheap for everyone else. Music's still filtered through just as many channels unless you have an influential friend or two. Not to mention the fact that everyone seems to need to have management/a booking agent nowadays from bands that play houses to arena acts. Just ask Seth how often the Club  talks to a band itself as opposed to an agent when booking it.
« Last Edit: November 17, 2014, 10:56:23 pm by azaghal1981 »
احمد

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1040 on: November 17, 2014, 11:33:46 pm »
That industry middle man he says is no more is still there. It's taken the form of the PR industry rather than the record industry. Music doesn't randomly find its way from Bandcamp to Pitchfork. It's a nice thought but no. Yes, it's cheaper/easier to get your music out there than ever before but it's just as easy/cheap for everyone else. Music's still filtered through just as many channels unless you have an influential friend or two. Not to mention the fact that everyone seems to need to have management/a booking agent nowadays from bands that play houses to arena acts. Just ask Seth how often the Club  talks to a band itself as opposed to an agent when booking it.


I don't fundamentally disagree with you, but I do think filters serve a purpose.  Maybe I am just getting old, but I don't have the time to invest in discovering stuff on my own as much as I used to.  So I rely more on filters/middlemen than I did in the past.  And I think there are a lot more middlemen and a lot more granular filters today, so things aren't totally as bad as they once were.

azaghal1981

  • Member
  • Posts: 12034
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1041 on: November 17, 2014, 11:55:40 pm »
Oh I'm not saying there's anything wrong with the filters at all. Albini (who appears to have a problem with them) seems to think that they no longer exist which is ridiculous.
احمد

azaghal1981

  • Member
  • Posts: 12034
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1042 on: November 18, 2014, 12:01:05 am »
I also wonder what his beef with Prince is. Thought everyone liked Prince.
احمد

i am gay and i like cats

  • Guest
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1043 on: November 18, 2014, 08:53:47 am »
I just watched an interview with riff raff.  I'm stupid now.

grateful

  • Member
  • Posts: 10292
  • 👤 👩 👦 📷 📺
    • Wait, the entire rest of the internet exists and you CHOOSE to post here? Who hurt you?
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1044 on: November 18, 2014, 12:02:50 pm »
I filter all my new music recommendations through hutch.

hutch

  • Guest
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1045 on: November 18, 2014, 02:34:29 pm »
I filter all my new music recommendations through hutch.

gotta say I'm probably not the best guy for "new music"

great "oldies" filter though!

 ;D

azaghal1981

  • Member
  • Posts: 12034
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1046 on: November 30, 2014, 07:41:36 pm »
Was unsure as to where else to put this.

https://twitter.com/killquilty/status/539112639096688643
احمد

Rogue Riderhood

  • Guest
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1047 on: November 30, 2014, 07:45:38 pm »
I saw they were doing that... That is cool it is nearly $1000.  It was a couple hundred the last time I saw something about it.

Justin Tonation

  • Member
  • Posts: 5379
  • Did you ever wonder?
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1048 on: December 02, 2014, 05:22:40 pm »


Audio, July 1970, Vol. 54, No. 7, page 46
« Last Edit: December 02, 2014, 05:24:29 pm by MDR-7506notBeats »
😐 🎶

azaghal1981

  • Member
  • Posts: 12034
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1049 on: December 10, 2014, 11:51:41 pm »
Oh wow. This is out. I remember Jaguar first posting about it here many years ago.
احمد