Author Topic: Musicological banter  (Read 895328 times)

hutch

  • Guest
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1410 on: October 23, 2015, 11:26:37 am »
well considering there are 3 target's within a 6 mile radius of your abode...which one is your 'local' target

wow we have a winner for STUPID QUESTION OF THE DAY here.


the closest one, you think????

Julian, Forum COGNOSCENTI

  • Member
  • Posts: 28522
  • 11x MVP, 1st Posts, HoF, Certified Weblebrity
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1411 on: October 23, 2015, 11:32:33 am »
I will buy an Adele CD when she resembles a human being and not a plastic bag filled with lard.

I gotta think this guy's BMI is well over 40:


40? That's insane. He's getting up there but you have to account for the fact he has like a 6'4" frame. He'd have to be 330 pounds to be a 40 BMI. That's clearly not 330 pounds.

That said, yeah, dude is getting rotund.
LVMH

Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1412 on: October 23, 2015, 11:41:13 am »
well considering there are 3 target's within a 6 mile radius of your abode...which one is your 'local' target

wow we have a winner for STUPID QUESTION OF THE DAY here.


the closest one, you think????
well...I always found it odd that off route 50 there are 3 targets within 8 miles of each other
so it was more a riff off that that which was the closest as they are all so unique
slack

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 21448
  • I don't belong here.
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1413 on: October 23, 2015, 01:20:59 pm »
I will buy an Adele CD when she resembles a human being and not a plastic bag filled with lard.

I gotta think this guy's BMI is well over 40:


40? That's insane. He's getting up there but you have to account for the fact he has like a 6'4" frame. He'd have to be 330 pounds to be a 40 BMI. That's clearly not 330 pounds.

That said, yeah, dude is getting rotund.

LOOK AT HIM - HE IS ALL THAT IS WRONG WITH THIS COUNTRY.  WE SHOULD KILL HIM FOR DESTROYING AMERICAN SOCIETY, PROVIDING A HORRIBLE EXAMPLE FOR OUR CHILDREN AND CAUSING SUFFERING EVERYWHERE HE GOES!!!

also, he's fat.
<sig>

Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1414 on: October 23, 2015, 02:03:10 pm »
Jules I can only assume you read the SP piece on MCatIS  retrospective
slack

Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1415 on: October 23, 2015, 03:40:54 pm »
Dylan does an IBM ADvert  (old news from earlier this month)
slack

killsaly

  • Guest
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1416 on: October 23, 2015, 04:22:10 pm »

Justin Tonation

  • Member
  • Posts: 5130
  • Did you ever wonder?
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1417 on: October 23, 2015, 09:49:24 pm »
Based on Twitter, there champagne corks popping over at Target and Best Buy. They might even need to add more CD racks....

Seems a bit needy....

1. Hello
2. Send My Love (To Your New Lover)
3. I Miss You
4. When We Were Young
5. Remedy
6. Water Under The Bridge
7. River Lea
8. Love In The Dark
9. Million Years Ago
10. All I Ask
11. Sweetest Devotion
😐 🎶

azaghal1981

  • Member
  • Posts: 12034
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1418 on: October 24, 2015, 07:24:26 am »
How NPR Killed College Rock
by Ian Svenonius
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/123187/how-npr-killed-college-rock
I'll probably go to his talk at Busboys before The Ex with Ken Vandermark and Puff Pieces on Tuesday.
احمد

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1419 on: October 25, 2015, 01:55:14 pm »
« Last Edit: October 25, 2015, 02:24:55 pm by ggw »

K8teebug

  • Member
  • Posts: 4120
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1420 on: October 27, 2015, 12:25:33 pm »
Can someone please help me understand Joanna Newsom? She's adorable, and I'm sure she's an accomplished musician, and I appreciate what she's trying to do, but it just sounds awful to me. Terrible and awful. What am I missing?

Julian, Forum COGNOSCENTI

  • Member
  • Posts: 28522
  • 11x MVP, 1st Posts, HoF, Certified Weblebrity
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1421 on: October 27, 2015, 12:26:53 pm »
Can someone please help me understand Joanna Newsom? She's adorable, and I'm sure she's an accomplished musician, and I appreciate what she's trying to do, but it just sounds awful to me. Terrible and awful. What am I missing?
I adore her. She definitely seems to be one of those acts where there's no one on the fence: you either love her or find it ridiculous. If you've listened to Ys and don't like it, I'm not going to convince you otherwise.
LVMH

Space Freely

  • Member
  • Posts: 9994
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1422 on: October 27, 2015, 12:29:49 pm »
Can someone please help me understand Joanna Newsom? She's adorable, and I'm sure she's an accomplished musician, and I appreciate what she's trying to do, but it just sounds awful to me. Terrible and awful. What am I missing?

I don't care for her music, but surely she upped her coolness factor by marrying the SNL dude.

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 21448
  • I don't belong here.
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1423 on: October 27, 2015, 12:43:27 pm »
it just sounds awful to me. Terrible and awful.

THIS.  

What am I missing?

the hype.
<sig>

killsaly

  • Guest
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1424 on: October 27, 2015, 01:05:47 pm »
Can someone please help me understand Joanna Newsom? She's adorable, and I'm sure she's an accomplished musician, and I appreciate what she's trying to do, but it just sounds awful to me. Terrible and awful. What am I missing?
I adore her. She definitely seems to be one of those acts where there's no one on the fence: you either love her or find it ridiculous. If you've listened to Ys and don't like it, I'm not going to convince you otherwise.
I could not even get through one song on her new album.

No thanks!!!!!!

Thankfully we all have different tastes, or it would be a boring world!