Author Topic: Musicological banter  (Read 894912 times)

Space Freely

  • Member
  • Posts: 9993
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1770 on: August 15, 2016, 10:49:49 pm »
Apparently John Lydon was hit with a bottle on stage at a show in Chile and finished the show all cut up





I'm more concerned that he's overweight and still smoking cigarettes and sporting such a cliche haricut at his advanced aged.

hutch

  • Guest
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1771 on: August 15, 2016, 10:54:20 pm »
Apparently John Lydon was hit with a bottle on stage at a show in Chile and finished the show all cut up





I'm more concerned that he's overweight and still smoking cigarettes and sporting such a cliche haricut at his advanced aged.

^concern trolling Exhibit A

Space Freely

  • Member
  • Posts: 9993
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1772 on: August 15, 2016, 11:07:24 pm »
The only disappointing part of that story was that it was only one bottle.

Justin Tonation

  • Member
  • Posts: 5130
  • Did you ever wonder?
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1773 on: August 15, 2016, 11:30:26 pm »
Apparently John Lydon was hit with a bottle on stage at a show in Chile and finished the show all cut up





I'm more concerned that he's overweight and still smoking cigarettes and sporting such a cliche haricut at his advanced aged.

Zero. Fucks. Given.
😐 🎶

walk,on,by

  • Guest
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1774 on: August 16, 2016, 12:07:59 am »
I was, going to post something witty, as the kids are saying nowadays . . . but wow, forum, wow.

walk,on,by

  • Guest
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1775 on: August 19, 2016, 09:45:11 am »
not sure how I feel about the new metallica, album.

killsaly

  • Guest
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1776 on: August 19, 2016, 11:16:41 am »
I do not know about the album either, but I did not hate the new track. 

Edit: Maddow digs it too
https://twitter.com/maddow/status/766394333335519233
Quote
God bless the great @Metallica for the new perfect soundtrack for 2016 -- just in time.
« Last Edit: August 19, 2016, 11:20:46 am by killsaly »

hutch

  • Guest
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1777 on: August 19, 2016, 11:28:59 am »
I do not know about the album either, but I did not hate the new track. 

Edit: Maddow digs it too
https://twitter.com/maddow/status/766394333335519233
Quote
God bless the great @Metallica for the new perfect soundtrack for 2016 -- just in time.

and we should care about what Rachel Maddow thinks about music because????

killsaly

  • Guest
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1778 on: August 19, 2016, 11:31:07 am »
I care more about her opinion than yours. 

I thought it was interesting that she commented on the song, that is all. 

grateful

  • Member
  • Posts: 9854
  • 👤 👩 👦 📷 📺
    • Wait, the entire rest of the internet exists and you CHOOSE to post here? Who hurt you?
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1779 on: August 19, 2016, 11:39:53 am »
I care more about her opinion than yours. 

I thought it was interesting that she commented on the song, that is all. 

I think it's less important that it is her, than it is that there is a consensus.  She is, like each of you, a data point.  If only we had polls on the forum...

killsaly

  • Guest
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1780 on: August 19, 2016, 11:43:50 am »
What do you think about the song?

grateful

  • Member
  • Posts: 9854
  • 👤 👩 👦 📷 📺
    • Wait, the entire rest of the internet exists and you CHOOSE to post here? Who hurt you?
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1781 on: August 19, 2016, 11:52:34 am »
Oh, I haven't listened yet.  I kinda like Metallica, but I'm having trouble getting excited about the news of new material.

walk,on,by

  • Guest
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1782 on: August 19, 2016, 12:33:30 pm »
radiohead's decks dark, is one of their most important new songs, that they have.

Julian, Forum COGNOSCENTI

  • Member
  • Posts: 28522
  • 11x MVP, 1st Posts, HoF, Certified Weblebrity
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1783 on: August 23, 2016, 10:54:29 am »
LVMH

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19716
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1784 on: August 23, 2016, 11:26:47 am »
27>34