Author Topic: Musicological banter  (Read 1663994 times)

Yada

  • Member
  • Posts: 12378

Yada

  • Member
  • Posts: 12378
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #4291 on: October 10, 2025, 12:40:45 pm »
I don't know what this means, but LOL.

https://imgur.com/a/DFwVuHk

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 22582
  • 12x MVP, and yet I don't belong here.
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #4292 on: October 10, 2025, 12:45:24 pm »
I don't know what this means, but LOL.

https://imgur.com/a/DFwVuHk

i think that means it's time to up the meds.
<sig>

Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #4293 on: October 10, 2025, 01:34:50 pm »
I don't know what this means, but LOL.

https://imgur.com/a/DFwVuHk

i think that means it's time to up the meds.
I think the time may have been over 30 years ago
but he loves drama
slack

kosmo vinyl

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 16276
    • Hi-Fi Pop
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #4294 on: October 10, 2025, 03:17:52 pm »
somebody over at the NYT is a big star fan, from today's connection

T.Rex

Justin Tonation

  • Member
  • Posts: 5739
  • Did you ever wonder?
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #4295 on: October 10, 2025, 06:35:35 pm »
somebody over at the NYT is a big star fan, from today's connection



Noticed it immediately and almost stopped the game to post it, but I had extra trouble with this iteration (came through though with no mistakes). Took so long I forgot.
😐 🎶

grateful tagle zuppi pizzaboli

  • Member
  • Posts: 11455
  • 👤 👩 👦 📷 📺
    • Wait, the entire rest of the internet exists and you CHOOSE to post here? Who hurt you?
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #4296 on: October 14, 2025, 08:09:50 am »
Looks like Bob Mould tends to tour the east coast a lot this time of year...


Speak of which,  Sugar rumors afloat...

In a move nobody expected, Sugar pivots to releasing an album of Wednesday covers.

Yada

  • Member
  • Posts: 12378

Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #4298 on: October 14, 2025, 08:46:51 am »
I don't know what the solution is for artists

Yes, support live music, but even that, the bands are getting much less of a cut
I do think that there needs to be a rule that they get 100% of a cut of the merch sales...

Streaming music is so convenient, that people are not actually supporting artists at all
There used to be a time when people would buy $200-500 of music over the course of a year (live shows/physical media)
because that was really the only way to consume music for decades

Now they spend about $50 or less a year, where the actual artists they love get about $1 of that
and as she stated, if they do go to a live show, it's an arena show and they spend $200-400 on just one night

Only thing I think artists can do is more subscription/pateron type things
but most people are not going to do that, but if you can get 10-20k fans across the world to do that...well then you can probably eak out a living

but even I don't do that :( 
I do buy vinyl / shirts and see them when ever they come to town, but I'm an outlier and not exactly putting food on the table
the above costs me probably $100-200 per artist and they probably only get $10-25 of that spend
« Last Edit: October 14, 2025, 08:52:03 am by PlenaryHatch lııllı|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|̲̅̅=̲̅̅|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|llıl »
slack

hutch

  • Member
  • Posts: 6143
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #4299 on: October 14, 2025, 09:04:06 am »
Thanks for posting Yada. I remember her saying this at Anthem but maybe in a more condensed form.

Am not a fan of Garbage but Shirley Manson is one cool cucumber!

It’s weird or hard to understand how artists struggle so much when ticket prices seem so high. T-shirts at shows now seem to average $40 and I see sweatshirts going for $75. Beers are $10.

A bigger and different issue is where is the music talking about the things happening in our world? Where is the reaction??? Most popular music might as well be AI generated: it sounds like it.

Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #4300 on: October 14, 2025, 09:22:12 am »
protest music from corp pop music machine...Ha!

Gaza has been just about the only rally cry as of late of the punk/independent artists and while people want to make it black and white, a complex issue with faults on all sides

this authoritarian rise, suppressing speech, the demonization of the 'other' and the demise of democracy is not getting enough focus, people are comfortable and not wanting to rock the boat

but I agree, we need more Dead Kennedys, The Clash, Bob Dylan and Woody
slack



hutch

  • Member
  • Posts: 6143
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #4303 on: October 16, 2025, 09:42:13 pm »
Am not sure primal scream would be able to get a visa to play US…

kosmo vinyl

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 16276
    • Hi-Fi Pop
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #4304 on: October 16, 2025, 09:44:17 pm »
This is what we need more of

The BBC are accidentally running the subtitles to Mrs Marple over the Mercury Prize, and it’s rather wonderful. A few of lines could plausibly have been written by Jarvis.

Picture on the bluesky

https://bsky.app/profile/peterchilvers.com/post/3m3dnk2z2xc2l
T.Rex