Author Topic: Terps  (Read 7250 times)

Cock Van Der Palm

  • Member
  • Posts: 1989
Terps
« on: March 03, 2015, 06:20:19 pm »
#10.  Carry on.

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: Terps
« Reply #1 on: March 03, 2015, 06:55:22 pm »
What's the over/under on the number of burning couches in College Park after the Terps go out in the third round of the Tourney?

Cock Van Der Palm

  • Member
  • Posts: 1989
Re: Terps
« Reply #2 on: March 03, 2015, 06:59:46 pm »
I'd take getting to the third round. Would only burn 1 couch and maybe an area rug, but would still be pretty happy.

i am gay and i like cats

  • Guest
Re: Terps
« Reply #3 on: March 03, 2015, 07:36:52 pm »
Worse college sports fuckheads?

Vatechhokies or umdterps?

imbecile

  • Member
  • Posts: 332
Re: Terps
« Reply #4 on: March 04, 2015, 09:08:39 am »
Worse college sports fuckheads?

Vatechhokies or umdterps?

Throw in all these new Alabama fans from the last few years and just call it a three way tie.

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: Terps
« Reply #5 on: March 04, 2015, 09:24:39 am »
I'd take getting to the third round. Would only burn 1 couch and maybe an area rug, but would still be pretty happy.

Because of these silly play-in games, "third round" in the NCAA vernacular actually means the round of 32.

Cock Van Der Palm

  • Member
  • Posts: 1989
Re: Terps
« Reply #6 on: March 04, 2015, 10:06:30 am »
Oh if thats the case, then I'd definitely burn a few more couches.  I'd be content with a Sweet 16 showing.

Julian, Bespoke SEXPERT

  • Member
  • Posts: 28932
  • 11x MVP, 1st Posts, HoF, Certified Weblebrity
Re: Terps
« Reply #7 on: March 04, 2015, 11:08:29 am »
I'd take getting to the third round. Would only burn 1 couch and maybe an area rug, but would still be pretty happy.

Because of these silly play-in games, "third round" in the NCAA vernacular actually means the round of 32.
I thought they gave up on that nomenclature and now the play-ins are the "Opening round" and the round of 64 is "first round", no? Or am I imagining this?
LVMH

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: Terps
« Reply #8 on: March 04, 2015, 11:10:47 am »
I'd take getting to the third round. Would only burn 1 couch and maybe an area rug, but would still be pretty happy.

Because of these silly play-in games, "third round" in the NCAA vernacular actually means the round of 32.
I thought they gave up on that nomenclature and now the play-ins are the "Opening round" and the round of 64 is "first round", no? Or am I imagining this?

http://www.ncaa.com/interactive-bracket/basketball-men/d1


Julian, Bespoke SEXPERT

  • Member
  • Posts: 28932
  • 11x MVP, 1st Posts, HoF, Certified Weblebrity
Re: Terps
« Reply #9 on: March 04, 2015, 11:19:13 am »
I'd take getting to the third round. Would only burn 1 couch and maybe an area rug, but would still be pretty happy.

Because of these silly play-in games, "third round" in the NCAA vernacular actually means the round of 32.
I thought they gave up on that nomenclature and now the play-ins are the "Opening round" and the round of 64 is "first round", no? Or am I imagining this?

http://www.ncaa.com/interactive-bracket/basketball-men/d1


OK, I'm imagining things again, apparently.

EDIT: Apparently I'm not, I'm just a year early.
LVMH

RatBastard

  • Member
  • Posts: 2955
    • Obscenitees
Re: Terps
« Reply #10 on: March 04, 2015, 02:15:30 pm »
Worse college sports fuckheads?

Vatechhokies or umdterps?

Not that it is a scientific test or anything but of the terps and hokies I know, the terps are by far and way the larger bags of douche.
FUKIT

Yada

  • Member
  • Posts: 11900
Re: Terps
« Reply #11 on: March 04, 2015, 02:54:47 pm »
Worse college sports fuckheads?

Vatechhokies or umdterps?

Not that it is a scientific test or anything but of the terps and hokies I know, the terps are by far and way the larger bags of douche.

I'd like to add UVA rapists.


Julian, Bespoke SEXPERT

  • Member
  • Posts: 28932
  • 11x MVP, 1st Posts, HoF, Certified Weblebrity
Re: Terps
« Reply #12 on: March 04, 2015, 03:03:24 pm »
I'd like to add UVA rapists.
That's been pretty conclusively refuted. Rolling Stone had to apologize for the article.
LVMH

Yada

  • Member
  • Posts: 11900
Re: Terps
« Reply #13 on: March 04, 2015, 03:05:39 pm »
I'd like to add UVA rapists.
That's been pretty conclusively refuted. Rolling Stone had to apologize for the article.

I'd be willing to bet there are still plenty of rapists at UVA.

Julian, Bespoke SEXPERT

  • Member
  • Posts: 28932
  • 11x MVP, 1st Posts, HoF, Certified Weblebrity
Re: Terps
« Reply #14 on: March 04, 2015, 03:06:54 pm »
I'd be willing to bet there are still plenty of rapists at UVA.
As opposed to what school? What an inane take.
LVMH