Welcome to the new forum
Quote from: sweetcell on March 27, 2016, 12:20:05 amcouldn't decide if this belongs here or in the Onion thread:More than 20,000 sign petition to allow guns at Republican National Conventionhttp://www.cnn.com/2016/03/26/politics/guns-petition-republican-national-convention/index.html"And supporters would like RNC Chairman Reince Priebus to explain why a "gun-free" venue was chosen for the Republican convention and to communicate a contingency plan to relocate the convention if nothing changes."the Secret Service has got to be loving this...This totally plays in to my dream of sending Julian to the conventionIt's going to be a shit show. Didn't realize we'd have to pay for a bullet proof Armani suitI think they should come up with a compromise and allow people to be paint gunsnow that would be fun
couldn't decide if this belongs here or in the Onion thread:More than 20,000 sign petition to allow guns at Republican National Conventionhttp://www.cnn.com/2016/03/26/politics/guns-petition-republican-national-convention/index.html"And supporters would like RNC Chairman Reince Priebus to explain why a "gun-free" venue was chosen for the Republican convention and to communicate a contingency plan to relocate the convention if nothing changes."the Secret Service has got to be loving this...
Quote from: sweetcell on March 16, 2016, 12:45:01 pmQuote from: killsaly on March 16, 2016, 12:20:17 pmhttps://twitter.com/NewDay/status/710065948657635328?ref_src=twsrcDonald seems to think there will be riots if he does not get the nomination. And other "bad things." paraphrasing here, but trump said "if i'm 100 votes short, but closer to the needed number than the next guy, i can't see how i shouldn't be given the nomination automatically". actually, you dolt, that's how the system works. if you didn't get 50% you don't get it automatically.I'll actually sort of defend Trump on this. While, yes, that is not how the system works, he's speaking more on a "fairness" level not a procedural one. He would be the clear choice of the voters. If Trump has 48% of the delegates and they go and give the nomination to Rubio or Bush, that's totally acceptable legally/procedurally, but it's also clearly giving a giant middle finger to the will of the people.
Quote from: killsaly on March 16, 2016, 12:20:17 pmhttps://twitter.com/NewDay/status/710065948657635328?ref_src=twsrcDonald seems to think there will be riots if he does not get the nomination. And other "bad things." paraphrasing here, but trump said "if i'm 100 votes short, but closer to the needed number than the next guy, i can't see how i shouldn't be given the nomination automatically". actually, you dolt, that's how the system works. if you didn't get 50% you don't get it automatically.
https://twitter.com/NewDay/status/710065948657635328?ref_src=twsrcDonald seems to think there will be riots if he does not get the nomination. And other "bad things."
Quote from: Julian, Authenticated LUXUROPHILE on March 16, 2016, 12:48:45 pmQuote from: sweetcell on March 16, 2016, 12:45:01 pmQuote from: killsaly on March 16, 2016, 12:20:17 pmhttps://twitter.com/NewDay/status/710065948657635328?ref_src=twsrcDonald seems to think there will be riots if he does not get the nomination. And other "bad things." paraphrasing here, but trump said "if i'm 100 votes short, but closer to the needed number than the next guy, i can't see how i shouldn't be given the nomination automatically". actually, you dolt, that's how the system works. if you didn't get 50% you don't get it automatically.I'll actually sort of defend Trump on this. While, yes, that is not how the system works, he's speaking more on a "fairness" level not a procedural one. He would be the clear choice of the voters. If Trump has 48% of the delegates and they go and give the nomination to Rubio or Bush, that's totally acceptable legally/procedurally, but it's also clearly giving a giant middle finger to the will of the people. i guess we'll agree to disagree... i'm more in line with http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/03/donald-trump-republican-convention-213770
I never understand arguments like the one below. This writer assumes that a vote for an opposing candidate is a vote AGAINST Trump. Like someone somehow can't like BOTH Trump AND (pick one, or more) Cruz, Carson, Rubio, Kasich, etc and just happen to like one of those other guys MORE THAN Trump.
PLEASE GOD I JUST NEED A FEW MORE YEARS
relaxer is upset, that his fuck thread, went nowhere.
Quote from: walk,on,by on March 30, 2016, 11:36:19 amrelaxer is upset, that his fuck thread, went nowhere.SAYS YOU, GIRLFRIENDC'mon, that was some straight up unique content I provided for you all. Problem is, I haven't had any more super dramatic adventures. I also have a bad habit of starting threads and then just abandoning them. How you doin, neglected KPOP thread?