I realize Pitt won all 3, but the statement was made like an excuse for Pitt's narrow margin of victory over Oakland... "it was their third game in three days." I was merely stating that it 3 in 3 days for all teams involved. In fact, one could argue that it was tougher for Oakland than Pitt. Afterall, Pitt won by 26 the first night, 17 the next. They hardly should have been tired, having not had to play a 40 minute competitive game. Oakland did play 2 fairly competitive games the first 2 nights, having to play their starters the entire time.
Of course, don't take this like I am an Oakland fan, just not a huge BCS fan, so I don't like to give credit to a BCS school at the expense of a non-BCS school. It was 3 games in 3 days for all, but they are 18-22 year olds, they should be able to do that.
