Maybe Clark Kellogg needs to look at your post regarding how BCS does not refer to basketball.
http://cbs.sportsline.com/collegebasketball/story/9834465 Ever-improving Davids get early start on humbling Goliaths
Nov. 28, 2006
By Clark Kellogg
CBS Sports
If you didn't enjoy the first few weeks of the season, you can't call yourself a college hoops fan. We had a taste of March Madness in November, sans the season being over for the losers.
Brian Ligon shows off Butler's NIT championship trophy. (Getty Images)
All over the landscape there were power conference (BCS) schools losing to non-power conference schools:
â?¢ Butler won the NIT Season Tip-Off, beating Notre Dame, Indiana, Tennessee and Gonzaga;
â?¢ Oral Roberts beat Kansas, ranked No. 3 at the time;
â?¢ Air Force foiled Stanford, Colorado and Texas Tech;
â?¢ Jackson State won a thriller at Rutgers;
â?¢ Old Dominion dispatched Georgetown;
â?¢ Xavier defeated Villanova;
â?¢ Missouri State stunned Wisconsin;
â?¢ Vermont bounced Boston College;
â?¢ Buffalo beat Miami;
â?¢ Western Michigan edged Virginia Tech.
Granted, most of these wins were on neutral courts, but Air Force, Old Dominion, Oral Roberts and Vermont all earned true road wins.
I love the plethora of pre-conference events and tournaments. I won't pretend to understand the challenges, dynamics and financial considerations of scheduling, but I think it's healthy for college hoops to have BCS schools vs. non-BCS schools on neutral courts. In many cases, it's the only way for these matchups to occur outside of postseason play. And that's a shame.
I would also like to see more BCS schools do home-and-homes with a few non-BCS schools. It presents a real possibility for losses, both financially and on the court, but I think it would be good for the game.