sweets any updates on Ukraine?
Trump promised to end the war in Ukraine within 24 hours of being elected.
is the caveat that we have to wait until Jan 21?
WARNING: long, meandering reply below.
trump isn't allowed negotiating with foreign governments until the afternoon of Jan 20 (Logan Act) so yeah we'll have to wait. he could release his plan before then (along with his healthcare plan, his infrastructure plan, etc..).
mood in Ukraine, based on what i'm seeing, is a mix of resignation and resolve. they survived the first 6-8 months of the conflict against a fresh and fully armed russian army with minimal help so continuing the fight against a depleted russia isn't something they're going to back away from, even without US support - it'll just be harder and more painful.
other rando thoughts/observations:
- trump hasn't released *any* details of his peace plan. the best guess is he will use military aid for UA and sanctions relief for RU as carrots and sticks to force a deal which would include UA ceding occupied territories. but lots of other speculation out there, like trump could continue arms deliveries in exchange for access to UA's natural resources, specifically mining.
- European leaders need to figure out the path forward, since this is a european conflict. they no longer have the luxury of dithering given how uncertain future US support is. doing nothing and letting UA fall isn't an option for the EU. worryingly it will take years to fully ramp up EU arms production. in the short-term they might need to buy supplies from the US, South Korea, etc
- Politico is reporting that
Biden is trying to rush remaining aid to UA as quickly as possible, the assumption being that anything that isn't delivered by Jan 20 will be stopped. currently, perception of the biden admin is mixed at best: lots has been promised but actual deliveries are lagging, and his emphasis on escalation management (AKA don't do anything that even has a chance of pissing off the ruzzians) gives the impression that he doesn't actually want UA to win the war, so he delivers just enough to keep them in the fight. the ban on using western weapons on ruzzian territory is hugely unpopular (some hope that with the election over, he'll lift this prohibition - tbd). so maybe a shakeup in Washington is needed to move the needle...
- some Ukrainians are maintaining cautious optimism: trump is fickle and can't be predicted. so far Zelensky has sent a congratulatory message to him, while putin is refusing to since ruzzia still considers the US to be a hostile nation. maybe putin is just keeping up appearances and they're chatting behind the scenes, or maybe Zelensky can get trump on his side by stroking his ego and telling him he could be a hero by saving UA... who knows.
- there are modestic forced that could push trump in UA's corner or at least prevent a full abandonment. a good number of GOP senators are strongly pro-Ukraine so they'll be pushing him. if trump abandons UA and it falls to ruzzia, that would make trump look bad - he promised a deal & peace, so having ruzzia win on his watch isn't a look he wants.
- finally, Ukrainians and their supporters are rightfully more fearful of vance than they are of trump, as he is vehemently anti-Ukraine and is seen as much less flexible on the issue than trump.