Author Topic: bands that are considered "gods" but you think  (Read 27191 times)

Mobius

  • Member
  • Posts: 1289
Re: bands that are considered "gods" but you think
« Reply #135 on: July 15, 2008, 10:34:00 pm »
. . . but ac/dc through 1980 ruled.

dave24

  • Member
  • Posts: 352
Re: bands that are considered "gods" but you think
« Reply #136 on: July 15, 2008, 11:01:00 pm »
Radiohead
 Ryan Adams
 Wilco
 
 Most of all though... Bruce Springsteen

RatBastard

  • Member
  • Posts: 2955
    • Obscenitees
Re: bands that are considered "gods" but you think
« Reply #137 on: July 16, 2008, 03:04:00 am »
THE MONKEES.  Someone had to say that!
FUKIT

godsshoeshine

  • Member
  • Posts: 4826
Re: bands that are considered "gods" but you think
« Reply #138 on: July 16, 2008, 07:43:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by Ever Circling Skeletal Family:
  You know what I hate more than this thread.....posting photo's of cats with lame comments on them!    :mad:   Just what is it with that?
<img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v54/timeisanocean/funny-pictures-old-man-cat.jpg" alt=" - " />
o/\o

kosmo vinyl

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 15209
    • Hi-Fi Pop
Re: bands that are considered "gods" but you think
« Reply #139 on: July 16, 2008, 08:09:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by vansmack:
   
Quote
Originally posted by very sonick:
  can we just list every popular band on here and get it over with?
Good god, that would take forever.  Why don't we just say most of the bands Smackie likes suck and be done with it?
 
 It doesn't hurt my feelings... [/b]
this is why these threads are pointless and just where are the "unpopular" bands that bickering indie elitists think are gods?
 
 Clap Your Hands Say Yeah
 Modest Mouse
 SUPERCHUNK
 The Decemberists
 New Pronographers
 etc.
 
 What i notice is interesting, is that most of the bands listed in this thread were once staples on radio and there is a definite lack of newer artists.   i suspect that if radio were still one of the primary ways in which to listen to music, that several of the highly touted "indie" bands would pop up on peoples lists.
T.Rex

Frank Gallagher

  • Member
  • Posts: 4792
Re: bands that are considered "gods" but you think
« Reply #140 on: July 16, 2008, 09:54:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by god's shoeshine:
   
Quote
Originally posted by Ever Circling Skeletal Family:
  You know what I hate more than this thread.....posting photo's of cats with lame comments on them!     :mad:    Just what is it with that?
<img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v54/timeisanocean/funny-pictures-old-man-cat.jpg" alt=" - " /> [/b]
<img src="http://www.numoonus.com/ShortEssays/EvilCats/CatFinger.jpg" alt=" - " />

Relaxer

  • Member
  • Posts: 5409
Re: bands that are considered "gods" but you think
« Reply #141 on: July 16, 2008, 10:13:00 am »
<img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3168/2673628381_af39fa9e05_o.jpg" alt=" - " />
oword

walkonby

  • Guest
Re: bands that are considered "gods" but you think
« Reply #142 on: July 16, 2008, 10:36:00 am »
one of my friends has a kitten for a pet . . . and i am offended.

Frank Gallagher

  • Member
  • Posts: 4792
Re: bands that are considered "gods" but you think
« Reply #143 on: July 16, 2008, 10:51:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by walkonby:
  one of my friends has a kitten for a pet . . . and i am offended.
So gays do like pussy!
 
 (Sorry but I couldn't help myself)

sonickteam2

  • Guest
Re: bands that are considered "gods" but you think
« Reply #144 on: July 16, 2008, 11:17:00 am »
<img src="http://i109.photobucket.com/albums/n66/aliecat27/hipster-kitteh-sez-werez-mah-white-.jpg" alt=" - " />

walkonby

  • Guest
Re: bands that are considered "gods" but you think
« Reply #145 on: July 16, 2008, 02:17:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Ever Circling Skeletal Family:
   
Quote
Originally posted by walkonby:
  one of my friends has a kitten for a pet . . . and i am offended.
So gays do like pussy!
 
 (Sorry but I couldn't help myself) [/b]
all my friends are gay?  now, they are offended.

Frank Gallagher

  • Member
  • Posts: 4792
Re: bands that are considered "gods" but you think
« Reply #146 on: July 16, 2008, 02:24:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by walkonby:
   
Quote
Originally posted by Ever Circling Skeletal Family:
     
Quote
Originally posted by walkonby:
  one of my friends has a kitten for a pet . . . and i am offended.
So gays do like pussy!
 
 (Sorry but I couldn't help myself) [/b]
all my friends are gay?  now, they are offended. [/b]
No ya wallie....the fact you were offended by a not so flattering photo of a kitten.
 
 BUT if your friend who has a kitten for a pet is male, then he needs to be gay!
 
 Cats are totally gay pets. One step lower on the gay-o-meter than a toy poodle.

walkonby

  • Guest
Re: bands that are considered "gods" but you think
« Reply #147 on: July 16, 2008, 02:32:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Ever Circling Skeletal Family:
   
Quote
Originally posted by walkonby:
     
Quote
Originally posted by Ever Circling Skeletal Family:
     
Quote
Originally posted by walkonby:
  one of my friends has a kitten for a pet . . . and i am offended.
So gays do like pussy!
 
 (Sorry but I couldn't help myself) [/b]
all my friends are gay?  now, they are offended. [/b]
No ya wallie....the fact you were offended by a not so flattering photo of a kitten.
 
 BUT if your friend who has a kitten for a pet is male, then he needs to be gay!
 
 Cats are totally gay pets. One step lower on the gay-o-meter than a toy poodle. [/b]
your logic is sellable to small countries, me think.

godsshoeshine

  • Member
  • Posts: 4826
Re: bands that are considered "gods" but you think
« Reply #148 on: July 16, 2008, 02:33:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by very sonick:
   <img src="http://i109.photobucket.com/albums/n66/aliecat27/hipster-kitteh-sez-werez-mah-white-.jpg" alt=" - " />
smackie?
o/\o

hutch

  • Guest
Re: bands that are considered "gods" but you think
« Reply #149 on: July 16, 2008, 03:29:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Mobius:
  . . . but ac/dc through 1980 ruled.
i think ac dc still rules.. they make chuck berry rock and roll and sing about sex, booze and floozies...parties and good times..
 
 the reason rock is going down the crapper is cause modern rock and roll (indie to coldplay through radiohead and nickelback..all of it) has gotten away from fun... i call it rock without the roll.. its boring..its not a party like ac dc is..
 
 and whoever posted they have been making the same album since 1980??? so what? its good music... who made who is a kickass song...stiff upper lip is a great album (listen to it before you slag it)..
 
 i think only through reconnecting with its roots- chuck berry- will rock and roll continue to be fun... when you think of the great bands: beatles, stones and faces, ac dc, flaming groovies..they all come from chuck berry.. he pretty much invented the thing.. lennon as is well known stated "if there was another word for rock and roll it would be chuck berry"
 
 well modern bands like pavement/malkmus, grunge and all that jive..thats all about as far as you can be from chuck berry...
 
 some call that progress but i say its devolution baby.