bjork - she just bugs. i'm not convinced she has any real talent.
<img src="http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/6958/bjorkdiddyfh8.gif" alt=" - " />
and this will probably assure me a permanent spot on thedirector's shit-list, but: the rolling stones. an interesting take on blues-rock... in the 1960's. FOURTY years later, not so much. (incoming hate via text msg in four, three, two...)
Originally posted by callat703:
The Stooges
most of their recorded work doesn't suck, but furthermore they get a pass b/c of what i've seen them do on stage
recently. here, to appease thedirector: i've never seen the rolling stoned perform, maybe i'll change my mind once i see mick sashay across the stage in that ultra-hetero manner of his.
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
No votes for Radiohead?!?!
The band isn't bad, but the levels to which their sycophantic fans insert their collective tongue up the band's collective butt is just crazy.
glad to see i'm not the only one with ADD here. topic is bands that suck, not bands who have fans that suck. by your own admission, the band is OK (aka doesn't suck).
Originally posted by Relaxer:
If I hear one more person ejaculate about Daft Punk and their pyramid ("ooooooh, that stage prop is totally blowing my mind"), I'm going to drop dead, resurrect, and drop dead again.
again, not the band or even the stage prop itself - it's the fans going on and on about it. i'd add "if you'd experienced it, you'd be one of those babbling fools too", but i think i've generated enough hatred for one night.
