Author Topic: My Morning Jacket Roll Call  (Read 5789 times)

Chulahoma

  • Member
  • Posts: 498
Re: My Morning Jacket Roll Call
« Reply #15 on: November 28, 2006, 11:19:00 am »
im psyched about tonight's show.  how long was mmj's set?

vassego

  • Member
  • Posts: 112
Re: My Morning Jacket Roll Call
« Reply #16 on: November 28, 2006, 11:32:00 am »
Right about 1 hour 30 minutes, with a short encore break.

thingsfallapart

  • Member
  • Posts: 340
Re: My Morning Jacket Roll Call
« Reply #17 on: November 28, 2006, 01:14:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by vassego:
  Right about 1 hour 30 minutes, with a short encore break.
That's it?  Are you sure?

BookerT

  • Member
  • Posts: 1410
Re: My Morning Jacket Roll Call
« Reply #18 on: November 28, 2006, 01:18:00 pm »
it was a little over 1:45, i think. 13 songs plus a 6 song encore. great show, lots of people trying to get rid of extras, i'd suggest heading down there if you want to go and got shut out.

palahniukkubrick

  • Guest
Re: My Morning Jacket Roll Call
« Reply #19 on: November 28, 2006, 08:38:00 pm »
Quote
What'd people think of The Slip? I'm pretty ambivalent at this point...they were fine, but I was too eager for MMJ to really appreciate them.  
I liked them a lot, although not at first. They started off sounding like a cross between jam and indie--not a good match. Then their songs got really groovy and psychadelic, enough so to make me buy their CD.
 
 As for MMJ, they were great as usual. Lots of energy+great lighting+great songs= excellent show. Jim James' voice is otherworldly, and the band is as tight as can be. I was pleased.

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 22379
  • 12x MVP, and yet I don't belong here.
Re: My Morning Jacket Roll Call
« Reply #20 on: November 29, 2006, 01:24:00 am »
second night was damn good, but can't say that i was utterly blown away.  i came expecting a good show and MMJ delivered, so in my employer-speak they met expectations (but didn't exceed them).  light show was very good, but i thought sound quality was wobbly until 20-30 mins in.  main set was 1:10-1:20, and after a relatively short we-want-more session they came back out for another 30-35 mins of over-time.
 
 what was Jim playing for the first song of the encore?  some sort of triangular-shaped midi surface thingy, from my vantage point i couldn't make out what is was.  
 
 <insert typical rant about people talking through the show>
 
 when i first got to the club, the place was packed solid.  by then end of the show, i was three back from the stage... not typical, in my experience, not that i'm complaining.
 
 definitely a good night at the club.  damn we're lucky to have the 9:30.
<sig>

thingsfallapart

  • Member
  • Posts: 340
Re: My Morning Jacket Roll Call
« Reply #21 on: November 29, 2006, 01:44:00 am »
I was completely blown away tonight.  The only time I thought it was slow was the beginning of the encore (I also don't know what instrument Jim was playing for the first song), but besides that the band played with an incredible intensity.  The setlist was great.  Jim James continues to be one of the great performers I've seen.
 
 How did night two compare to night one?

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 22379
  • 12x MVP, and yet I don't belong here.
Re: My Morning Jacket Roll Call
« Reply #22 on: November 29, 2006, 02:12:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by thingsfallapart:
  How did night two compare to night one?
inquiring minds definitely want to know... anyone?
 
 and if i may add an aside: did anyone notice the flat-stomach'ed white-crop-top-wearing hottie on the stage right guest balcony?!?  DEAR LORD.  i wonder which band member's girlfriend she was.
<sig>

brennser

  • Member
  • Posts: 3760
Re: My Morning Jacket Roll Call
« Reply #23 on: November 29, 2006, 08:29:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by sweetcell:
   
Quote
Originally posted by thingsfallapart:
  How did night two compare to night one?
inquiring minds definitely want to know... anyone?
 
 and if i may add an aside: did anyone notice the flat-stomach'ed white-crop-top-wearing hottie on the stage right guest balcony?!?  DEAR LORD.  i wonder which band member's girlfriend she was. [/b]
I thought it was a good show - first time I've seen em live. Some guys beside me said the second night was much better than the first
 
 and I think everyone noticed that hottie....DEAR LORD indeed!!

Relaxer

  • Member
  • Posts: 5409
Re: My Morning Jacket Roll Call
« Reply #24 on: November 29, 2006, 11:23:00 am »
Eh... I thought it was okay, I'd give it a C+. For me, it started out great with 'Holiday', lots of energy, great sound, hair flying all around, Kiss boots a-kickin. But after about half an hour, I thought the energy level just sagged. And starting out an encore with three slow songs in a row is poor pacing.
oword

vassego

  • Member
  • Posts: 112
Re: My Morning Jacket Roll Call
« Reply #25 on: November 29, 2006, 12:20:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by sweetcell:
  damn we're lucky to have the 9:30.
Ditto.

brennser

  • Member
  • Posts: 3760
Re: My Morning Jacket Roll Call
« Reply #26 on: November 29, 2006, 12:38:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Relaxer:
  And starting out an encore with three slow songs in a row is poor pacing.
yeah I thought that was a strange choice

Mr.Whippy

  • Member
  • Posts: 484
Re: My Morning Jacket Roll Call
« Reply #27 on: November 29, 2006, 01:17:00 pm »
I thought the show was great last night.  I think my fourth time seeing MMJ and probably the best.  I think the setlist was much better than the 9:30 show last year in the pick of older songs.  
 
 One question, does anyone know if MMJ use prerecorded tracks when they play live?  I'm sometimes bad at picking out individual instruments live, but there were times when it sounded like additional voices were kicking in.  Also, in the song "Steam Engine" there is a backing vocal part that sounded like Jim James also doing it, but I couldn't tell if someone else was singing backup or if it was prerecorded.  I guess it could have been sung originaly by JJ and looped or something.

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 22379
  • 12x MVP, and yet I don't belong here.
Re: My Morning Jacket Roll Call
« Reply #28 on: November 29, 2006, 01:34:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by JonathanEH:
  One question, does anyone know if MMJ use prerecorded tracks when they play live?  I'm sometimes bad at picking out individual instruments live, but there were times when it sounded like additional voices were kicking in.  Also, in the song "Steam Engine" there is a backing vocal part that sounded like Jim James also doing it, but I couldn't tell if someone else was singing backup or if it was prerecorded.  I guess it could have been sung originaly by JJ and looped or something.
i'm an under-achieving music geek, so i tend to notice these things - and i didn't notice any backing tracks last night.  jim definitely had a harmonizer (doubler) effect on his voice at one point, but that's real-time processing not pre-recorded. as i'm sure you saw, carl and bo were doing backing vocals.
<sig>

Relaxer

  • Member
  • Posts: 5409
Re: My Morning Jacket Roll Call
« Reply #29 on: November 29, 2006, 02:14:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by JonathanEH:
  I thought the show was great last night.  I think my fourth time seeing MMJ and probably the best.  I think the setlist was much better than the 9:30 show last year in the pick of older songs.  
 
 One question, does anyone know if MMJ use prerecorded tracks when they play live?  I'm sometimes bad at picking out individual instruments live, but there were times when it sounded like additional voices were kicking in.  Also, in the song "Steam Engine" there is a backing vocal part that sounded like Jim James also doing it, but I couldn't tell if someone else was singing backup or if it was prerecorded.  I guess it could have been sung originaly by JJ and looped or something.
I always look for that sort of thing too, particularly with guitar tracks. Clearly they had some tapes going with drum/percussion tracks. And I'd say that his vocals were a lot more than double-tracked, though I do agree that it's probably a real-time thing than a pre-recorded effect.
oword