Author Topic: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers  (Read 20912 times)

kosmo vinyl

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 15348
    • Hi-Fi Pop
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #15 on: July 24, 2008, 02:00:00 pm »
maybe since there so many of them they'll come by greyhound, that way the driver can be instructed to ditch them somewhere in kansas...
T.Rex

walkonby

  • Guest
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #16 on: July 24, 2008, 02:02:00 pm »
"with the way fashion (as in clothes/lifestyles) change, and how people alter their attitudes throughout their lives, why do people have tattoos?"

kosmo vinyl

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 15348
    • Hi-Fi Pop
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #17 on: July 24, 2008, 02:17:00 pm »
here's hoping they'll do something to piss kanye off  :D
T.Rex

Relaxer

  • Member
  • Posts: 5409
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #18 on: July 24, 2008, 02:21:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by walkonby:
  "with the way fashion (as in clothes/lifestyles) change, and how people alter their attitudes throughout their lives, why do people have tattoos?"
Because they like them, Richard Cohen.
oword

walkonby

  • Guest
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #19 on: July 24, 2008, 02:32:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Relaxer:
   
Quote
Originally posted by walkonby:
  "with the way fashion (as in clothes/lifestyles) change, and how people alter their attitudes throughout their lives, why do people have tattoos?"
Because they like them, Richard Cohen. [/b]
actually, a lot of people think like him.  even the bible says that tattoos are marks of the devil.

sonickteam2

  • Guest
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #20 on: July 24, 2008, 02:42:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by kosmo:
  here's hoping they'll do something to piss kanye off   :D  
thats awesome.  
 
   maybe we should have maskapalooza and have slipknot and insane clown posse play.
 
   bands with masks suck almost as much as bands with saxaphones.

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 21870
  • I don't belong here.
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #21 on: July 24, 2008, 02:57:00 pm »
but not as much as bands with accordions.
<sig>

_adam

  • Member
  • Posts: 35
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #22 on: July 24, 2008, 03:04:00 pm »
i for one think this is going to be hilarious
 
 they're astonishingly bad, no doubt, but who doesn't love watching a good ol' fashioned musical trainwreck?

Driveway

  • Member
  • Posts: 619
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #23 on: July 24, 2008, 03:12:00 pm »
I saw F-them.  I'd rather see Jimmie's Chicken Shack.

killsaly

  • Guest
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #24 on: July 24, 2008, 03:14:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by DeathFromAbove1979:
 
 Ugh, that's horrific. And what's wrong with We Are Scientists!?
you would think they would have been a shoe in.  I still think the masses picked the wrong band last year, by not voting for Cold War Kids.

kosmo vinyl

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 15348
    • Hi-Fi Pop
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #25 on: July 24, 2008, 03:22:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by sweetcell:
  but not as much as bands with accordions.
watch what you say about accordions... i remember when a record store in detroit ran an ad making  a disparaging remark about accordion music and it caused quite an uproar
T.Rex

serpent boy

  • Member
  • Posts: 449
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #26 on: July 24, 2008, 03:28:00 pm »
I think the promoters really just want to mock anyone who bought a ticket. Now you get to see these talentless shitheads along with Paramore and Taking Back Sunday! It's like a sub-par Warped Tour for half the day.
 
 The Washington Post has it right (except We Are Scientists aren't half bad). The V-Fest made a really dumb mistake.

Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #27 on: July 24, 2008, 03:53:00 pm »
Is it fair to say the V-Fest has one of the highest single day price tags of any American festival, for the least amount of bands and stages?

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 21870
  • I don't belong here.
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #28 on: July 24, 2008, 04:06:00 pm »
i'm pretty sure it's the most expensive, i can't think of any other major festival that charges as much.  
 
 the worse value proposition (# bands/stages vs. price) is questionable.  don't forget the dance tent, i'd consider that a third stage.  VFest has a really solid line-up for folks into EDM.  
 
 friday @ outsidelands has VFest beat in terms of a worse value, on a one-day basis.
 
   
Quote
Originally posted by Relaxer:
  Who actually gets to festivals early enough to see the first band on the bill?
if it's not oppressively hot on day 1 of lolla, i plan to catch fuck buttons @ 12:15 - first act of the day on the at&t stage.  on saturday i might catch the ting tings, also first band of the day on that stage.
<sig>

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #29 on: July 24, 2008, 04:24:00 pm »
I'm disappointed that nobody has tipped off the band so that they can unleash the fury of the "Undead Army" on the Post's blog.