Author Topic: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers  (Read 20482 times)

lancha

  • Member
  • Posts: 77
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #45 on: July 24, 2008, 11:58:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by sweetcell:
    how did they even get short-listed for book the band?  quality control fail!
that is really I want to know.

6949

  • Member
  • Posts: 567
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #46 on: July 25, 2008, 12:12:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by JonathanEH:
 
 It's so bad that I think I'm going to specifically get there early enough to witness the spectacle.
Please dress up like them. Please.
xoxo

thatguy

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 1268
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #47 on: July 25, 2008, 03:35:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by walkonby:
  actually, a lot of people think like him.  even the bible says that tattoos are marks of the devil.
where?  version, book, and verse please.

sonickteam2

  • Guest
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #48 on: July 25, 2008, 07:27:00 am »
while it doesnt say "devil" it does mention tattoos....
 
 Leviticus 19.28
 
 â??Do not cut your bodies for the dead or put tattoo marks on yourselves,â?

kosmo vinyl

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 14979
    • Hi-Fi Pop
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #49 on: July 25, 2008, 07:31:00 am »
what would make this even more comical is the rantings of a forumer who no longer trolls these parts...
T.Rex

kosmo vinyl

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 14979
    • Hi-Fi Pop
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #50 on: July 25, 2008, 07:46:00 am »
it's too bad that this version of "hollywood undead" isn't playing the festival as they have a bit of a Dead Milkmen vibe to them... and the comments from the fans for  the TRU crappywood douchedead are hilarious and sad because it appears there is entire generation of illiterate kids out there
 
 oh yeah NSFW much like sweetcell's vid link
 
  I must be emo
T.Rex

killsaly

  • Guest
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #51 on: July 25, 2008, 08:03:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by DeathFromAbove1979:
 
I was also incredbily pissed the Kids didn't win last year, but I saw them at 930 and they were phenomenal so....
 [/QB][/QUOTE]I caught them at the club twice so far, and both times they were amazing.  I really wanted to see them on a big stage though.

Mr.Whippy

  • Member
  • Posts: 484
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #52 on: July 25, 2008, 08:12:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by eros:
  Oh. My. God.
 
 
Read through a few pages of the comments below the video and weep for the future of our nation.

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 21677
  • I don't belong here.
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #53 on: July 25, 2008, 08:40:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by lancha:
     
Quote
Originally posted by sweetcell:
    how did they even get short-listed for book the band?  quality control fail!
that is really I want to know. [/b]
however, it's somewhat understandable that they were picked for inclusion in the contest if you believe their myspace hype, and that none of the organizers bothered listening to them.  that last part is the QC issue - just because they have online hype with california teens/fratboys-to-be doesn't mean they should be included in VFest's lineup.
 
 but i'm starting to come around to the entertainment value these morons will bring.  can we please resurrect the timeless tradition of throwing rotten tomatoes?  please?
<sig>

Mr.Whippy

  • Member
  • Posts: 484
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #54 on: July 25, 2008, 09:04:00 am »
OK I think I'm becoming part of the problem.  I'm sending the link to the No.5 video to everyone I know and telling them about my new favorite band.
 
 "Don't kiss me bitch you just threw up!"

killsaly

  • Guest
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #55 on: July 25, 2008, 09:39:00 am »
Well due to myspace hype we are now stuck with Tila Tequila AND these guys.  
 
 thanks again myspace, you really help advance our popular culture.  
 
 Unless they just go away, which could happen.

taperkat

  • Member
  • Posts: 250
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #56 on: July 25, 2008, 10:04:00 am »
These guys give street teamers a bad name, i've been doing that for 10 years and holy fuck i'd tell those guys to sell their noisemakers, because those sure as hell aren't instruments, and get a real job...

DeathFromAbove1979

  • Member
  • Posts: 5038
    • Twitter
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #57 on: July 25, 2008, 10:34:00 am »
I smell a new Puddle of Mudd.
‼‼?‼‼

mdh9857

  • Member
  • Posts: 559
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #58 on: July 25, 2008, 11:25:00 am »
I couldn't find their Wiki page, but I found their Urban Dictionary page.  This is priceless, and their street team is out of control.  I didn't realize that they first "came onto the scene" in 2005 and it took them 3 years to put out a cd.  Ugh.
 
 http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Hollywood+Undead

Got Haggis?

  • Member
  • Posts: 2008
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #59 on: July 25, 2008, 11:31:00 am »
what...the...fuck\
 
 that video....how did this band even get considered for the opening slot?? are you kidding me???