Author Topic: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers  (Read 20479 times)

lancha

  • Member
  • Posts: 77
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #75 on: July 25, 2008, 04:30:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by wml7:
  Remember what Seth said.  Should be better then Lollapalooza and Bonnaroo combined.
he also said he would never book limp bizkit.
 
 he came pretty close though.

lancha

  • Member
  • Posts: 77
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #76 on: July 25, 2008, 04:31:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Arthwys:
  we can't think of a better venue than the Virgin Mobile Festival to play our first-ever live show," said J-Dog of Hollywood Undead.
these people have bad thinking skills then.

Frank Gallagher

  • Member
  • Posts: 4792
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #77 on: July 25, 2008, 04:34:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by lancha:
   
Quote
Originally posted by Arthwys:
  we can't think of a better venue than the Virgin Mobile Festival to play our first-ever live show," said J-Dog of Hollywood Undead.
these people have bad thinking skills then. [/b]
Shouldn't it be J-DAWG? Fucking amateur wiggers.

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #78 on: July 25, 2008, 05:03:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Arthwys:
  http://www.nj.com/business/prnewswire/index.ssf?/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=NJ&STORY=/www/story/07-23-2008/0004854190&EDATE=Jul+23,+2008  
 
 "Music has always been at the core of the Virgin Mobile USA brand and
 for that reason, Book The Band is a natural extension of Virgin Mobile
 Festival," said Ron Faris, Director of Brand Development & Partnerships,
 Virgin Mobile USA. "As far as we're concerned, this year's contest was won
 on the mobile phone, with Hollywood Undead ramping up a huge campaign to
 get over 186,485 text votes. We at Virgin Mobile USA along with Kyocera
 Wireless are thrilled to host their first live show at our Virgin Mobile
 Festival."
 
     "Book the Band is a brilliant extension of the next wave of music
 discovery, and Virgin Mobile Festival has certainly found promising talent
 in Hollywood Undead to open Day Two," said Sir Richard Branson, whose
 legendary Virgin Festival heritage is the inspiration for the Virgin Mobile
 Festival. "I'm curious to see how well they'll do going from MySpace to our
 space!"
 
     "We can't think of a better venue than the Virgin Mobile Festival to
 play our first-ever live show," said J-Dog of Hollywood Undead. "To stand
 in front of the same fans who will be there to see musical legends perform
 is unreal. We'll do everything we can to make our first show something for
 fans to remember."
 
     Hollywood Undead beat out four other up-and-coming bands by receiving
 an overwhelming 53% (285,000 votes) of the more than 540,000 votes placed
 online and via text between June 16 through July 21. Hollywood Undead will
 release their highly anticipated debut album, "Swan Songs" (via A&M/Octone)
 on August 26, 2008. Tampa-based Automatic Loveletter came in second place
 with more than 161,000 votes. New Jersey's The Parlor Mob, Brooklyn's We
 Are Scientists, and New York's The Virgins came in third, fourth and fifth,
 respectively.
Got me a story didn't it
 
 Posted by: Seth Hurwitz | July 25, 2008 1:03 PM
 
 http://blog.washingtonpost.com/postrock/2008/07/hey_virgin_festival_decision_m.html

Mr.Whippy

  • Member
  • Posts: 484
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #79 on: July 25, 2008, 05:20:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by walkonby:
  VERY NOT SAFE FOR WORK!!
 
 WATCH ANYWAY.
 
 THIS IS THE SHIT!
 
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-tnryUkd4Y&feature=related
Finally, a song with more references to, um, putting it where it doesn't belong than Nick Cave's version of Stagger Lee!

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 21677
  • I don't belong here.
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #80 on: July 26, 2008, 12:12:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by ggw?:
 Got me a story didn't it
 
 Posted by: Seth Hurwitz | July 25, 2008 1:03 PM
 
    http://blog.washingtonpost.com/postrock/2008/07/hey_virgin_festival_decision_m.html  
UPDATE FOR DECISION-MAKERS: there actually is such a thing as bad publicity.
<sig>

Tom Servo

  • Member
  • Posts: 345
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #81 on: July 26, 2008, 01:29:00 am »
That was the exact quote I was about to post after listening to that song...you beat me to it.
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by JonathanEH:
 
 
 "Don't kiss me bitch you just threw up!"

Tom Servo

  • Member
  • Posts: 345
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #82 on: July 26, 2008, 01:36:00 am »
I could believe this
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by eros:
  After further reflection, there is no way this is legit.
 
 This "band" has to be some sort of a Borat meets Andy Kaufman type of joke.
 
 You heard it here first.

thatguy

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 1268
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #83 on: July 26, 2008, 04:24:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by very sonick:
  while it doesnt say "devil" it does mention tattoos....
 
 Leviticus 19.28
 
 ??Do not cut your bodies for the dead or put tattoo marks on yourselves,?
this is not directed at sonick.  this is one of my peeves.  if you're going to do something like quote the bible to make a point, at least do it right.  if someone had said that the bible says "god hates gays," i'm sure that mr. chip on his shoulder would've freaked out.  this is my minor freak out.
 
 
 1. the word tattoo is not likely an accurate translation.  it's probably more like: "Ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upon you: I am the LORD." KJV. LEV 19:28.
 
 a heathen custom of the time was to make deep cuts into the flesh in a time of mourning, to honor the dead.  there was also a common practice inking or painting (much like henna) or using hot irons to create floral and other designs that were often used to honor "false idols."  this is not the same thing as tattooing.
 
 B. there is no mention of the devil whatsoever.
 
 c. the verse before this one says that you can't cut your hair or trim your beard in a specific manner, and the one after says that you shouldn't let your daughter be a whore, lest the land fall to whoredom and wickedness.  there are also rules about what you can eat, and when, and how to make a proper sacrifice, and what to wear.  
 
 these laws were designed to keep people from taking on the religious customs of the surrounding groups.  even if it does mean don't get tattooed, which is debatable, it means don't get tattooed in the religious context of the surrounding tribes.  just like it doesn't mean you can't cut your hair or your beard, but rather that you shouldn't cut your hair in the specific manner that the priests of the surrounding tribes did.
 
 IV. leviticus is the old laws. it's wiped out by the new testament, if you believe such things.
 
 i could go on, but it's late.

Bombay Chutney

  • Member
  • Posts: 3951
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #84 on: July 26, 2008, 06:40:00 am »
Maybe it's really the long-awaited Fugazi reunion.

Relaxer

  • Member
  • Posts: 5409
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #85 on: July 26, 2008, 08:55:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by Bombay Chutney:
  Maybe it's really the long-awaited Fugazi reunion.
That would be awesome. Or if they all got up on stage, did a bunch of ninja poses and moves, set off some explosives, gave a gagged and masked woman a gang-spanking, and then took off their masks. Hey, it's Belle & Sebastian!
oword

earlx

  • Member
  • Posts: 44
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #86 on: July 26, 2008, 12:31:00 pm »
I don't think Hollywood Undead is anywhere close to being the worst band playing this festival.  That line-up is pretty shitty.

walkonby

  • Guest
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #87 on: July 26, 2008, 04:00:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by thatguy:
   
Quote
Originally posted by very sonick:
  while it doesnt say "devil" it does mention tattoos....
 
 Leviticus 19.28
 
 ??Do not cut your bodies for the dead or put tattoo marks on yourselves,?
this is not directed at sonick.  this is one of my peeves.  if you're going to do something like quote the bible to make a point, at least do it right.  if someone had said that the bible says "god hates gays," i'm sure that mr. chip on his shoulder would've freaked out.  this is my minor freak out.
 
 
 1. the word tattoo is not likely an accurate translation.  it's probably more like: "Ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upon you: I am the LORD." KJV. LEV 19:28.
 
 a heathen custom of the time was to make deep cuts into the flesh in a time of mourning, to honor the dead.  there was also a common practice inking or painting (much like henna) or using hot irons to create floral and other designs that were often used to honor "false idols."  this is not the same thing as tattooing.
 
 B. there is no mention of the devil whatsoever.
 
 c. the verse before this one says that you can't cut your hair or trim your beard in a specific manner, and the one after says that you shouldn't let your daughter be a whore, lest the land fall to whoredom and wickedness.  there are also rules about what you can eat, and when, and how to make a proper sacrifice, and what to wear.  
 
 these laws were designed to keep people from taking on the religious customs of the surrounding groups.  even if it does mean don't get tattooed, which is debatable, it means don't get tattooed in the religious context of the surrounding tribes.  just like it doesn't mean you can't cut your hair or your beard, but rather that you shouldn't cut your hair in the specific manner that the priests of the surrounding tribes did.
 
 IV. leviticus is the old laws. it's wiped out by the new testament, if you believe such things.
 
 i could go on, but it's late. [/b]
the bible is the king of interpretation; that's why it was written.  men who think god talk through them like to confuse.  i mentioned the devil, because i like to say the devil.  he's such a good reference point, and is used to being called out on the spot.  if it is against god (like stated in the bible), it is for the devil (that's what false idols represent).  chip on my shoulder?  from actions of the past?  i'm angry from things of the future, more than likely.  and god does hate gays.  they are so gosh darn perky, he could just screech.  don't you read the news or attend funerals of fallen soldiers?  the "god hate fags" church will protest the club if you don't believe.  i don't care if YOU, mr. covered in tattoos, do whatever you like to your body.  you could tattoo yourself on yourself, then re-tattoo that new person which you have become, for all i care.  i was just curious to the logic why people do it.  i've always wondered how much of it is "i really like it and the way it looks," and how much of it is, "i want someone else besides myself to look at me." like goth kids, who get all pissed off when you do look at them.  no law replaces old laws from the bible, when all laws from the bible are false to begin with . . . for i am one with the lord without it and the religion (created by the devil (he's smiling now) that came from it.
 
    <img src="http://www.sternfannetwork.com/forum/images/smilies/Animations/burnin-with-devil.gif" alt=" - " />

sonickteam2

  • Guest
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #88 on: July 26, 2008, 09:27:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by thatguy:
   
Quote
Originally posted by very sonick:
  while it doesnt say "devil" it does mention tattoos....
 
 Leviticus 19.28
 
 ??Do not cut your bodies for the dead or put tattoo marks on yourselves,?
this is not directed at sonick.  this is one of my peeves.  if you're going to do something like quote the bible to make a point, at least do it right.  [/b]
good post.  :)   and just to clarify my post, i only posted that passage because i have heard it argued before. I have tattoos, my wife has tattoos and mostly everyone i know does so i am certainly not against them.

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 21677
  • I don't belong here.
Re: Washington Post Disparages Virgin Fest Bookers
« Reply #89 on: July 26, 2008, 11:11:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by earlx:
  I don't think Hollywood Undead is anywhere close to being the worst band playing this festival.  That line-up is pretty shitty.
really?  who gets your vote for worse act on the bill?  
 
 i have no love for plenty of the bands (paramore, taking back sundays, etc) - but none of them blow as hard as hollywood undead.  non.
<sig>