Author Topic: Bands/records that have not aged well  (Read 4759 times)

Relaxer

  • Member
  • Posts: 5409
Bands/records that have not aged well
« on: December 13, 2006, 05:56:00 pm »
The discussion on the Pumpkins got me thinking about bands that have gotten less classic as time goes on. What are some others?
 
 I would say Jane's Addiction is up for this. I used to think Dave Navarro was such a great guitar player. Now I listen to those early albums and it sounds like cheesy 80s hair-metal.
oword

chaz

  • Member
  • Posts: 5111
  • este lugar es una mierda
Re: Bands/records that have not aged well
« Reply #1 on: December 13, 2006, 05:58:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Relaxer:
  The discussion on the Pumpkins got me thinking about bands that have gotten less classic as time goes on. What are some others?
 
 I would say Jane's Addiction is up for this. I used to think Dave Navarro was such a great guitar player. Now I listen to those early albums and it sounds like cheesy 80s hair-metal.
I'm with you.  95% of the the hardcore music I used to think was so cool hasn't aged well.  But there's that 5% that has....

HoyaSaxa03

  • Member
  • Posts: 7053
Re: Bands/records that have not aged well
« Reply #2 on: December 13, 2006, 06:07:00 pm »
"jane says" and "been caught stealing" still sound perfect, but i haven't listened to their albums in a while
(o|o)

palahniukkubrick

  • Guest
Re: Bands/records that have not aged well
« Reply #3 on: December 13, 2006, 06:13:00 pm »
New Order. I love "Power, Corruption, and Lies," but it just sounds trapped in the eighties. Same with a lot of bands of the era, like PIL and Depeche Mode. I don't fault them for this, but it still gets to me when listening.
 
 And I agree with you on Jane's Addiction. They may have been one of alternative rock's 'breakthrough' bands, but Perry Farrell and Dave Navarro continually tarnish their old band's reputation by being douchebag rock stars.

HoyaSaxa03

  • Member
  • Posts: 7053
Re: Bands/records that have not aged well
« Reply #4 on: December 13, 2006, 06:23:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by you be pickup:
  New Order. I love "Power, Corruption, and Lies," but it just sounds trapped in the eighties. Same with a lot of bands of the era, like PIL and Depeche Mode.
come on, i can think of a thousand bands that sound "trapped in the 80s", but new order (even early new order) still sounds fresh and really relevant
(o|o)

Bombay Chutney

  • Member
  • Posts: 3984
Re: Bands/records that have not aged well
« Reply #5 on: December 13, 2006, 06:28:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by you be pickup:
  New Order. I love "Power, Corruption, and Lies,"
Any other New Order record I might agree with.  Not this one though.  It's still a fantastic record.

Sir HC

  • Member
  • Posts: 4059
Re: Bands/records that have not aged well
« Reply #6 on: December 13, 2006, 06:40:00 pm »
I would say Big Star, and other bands whose production is that big 80s sound with the snappy snare with faux reverb, and super clicky kick for non-metal.  The production just ruins it for me, it is so "period".
 
 But PC&L is still a favorite because it is mostly guitar oriented and those that are not (Your Silent Face) are just amazing.

  • Guest
Re: Bands/records that have not aged well
« Reply #7 on: December 13, 2006, 07:19:00 pm »
Mary J.Bilge

smakawhat

  • Member
  • Posts: 325
Re: Bands/records that have not aged well
« Reply #8 on: December 13, 2006, 07:26:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Señor Carlos:
   
Quote
Originally posted by Relaxer:
  The discussion on the Pumpkins got me thinking about bands that have gotten less classic as time goes on. What are some others?
 
 I would say Jane's Addiction is up for this. I used to think Dave Navarro was such a great guitar player. Now I listen to those early albums and it sounds like cheesy 80s hair-metal.
I'm with you.  95% of the the hardcore music I used to think was so cool hasn't aged well.  But there's that 5% that has.... [/b]
you're drunk... now Dave's solo effort...
 
 
 EEEEeeesh....

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: Bands/records that have not aged well
« Reply #9 on: December 13, 2006, 09:26:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by smakawhat:
  you're drunk... now Dave's solo effort...
 
 
 EEEEeeesh....
This is a double sma(c)k because I'm with Smakawhat on this one.
 
 One of my favorite compilations this year is Jane's greatest hits.  Blew me away that some tracks on that album were written in the mid 80's.  
 
 "Jane Says" was written over 20 years ago!  It certainly doesn't sound anywhere near that old.  Neither does Whores, Chip Away or Pigs in Zen.  
 
 Now if we move up through Nothing's Shocking and into Ritual, then finally the mess that was Strays, I might tend to agree, but starting with the XXX release and then Nothing's Shocking - they have aged extremely well.
27>34

SPARX

  • Member
  • Posts: 2070
Re: Bands/records that have not aged well
« Reply #10 on: December 13, 2006, 10:54:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Surly Bonds:
 
 
 Also that I WILL SURVIVE song by The Grateful Dead.
I always thought that was Gloria Gaynor

chaz

  • Member
  • Posts: 5111
  • este lugar es una mierda
Re: Bands/records that have not aged well
« Reply #11 on: December 14, 2006, 12:02:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by vansmack:
   
Quote
Originally posted by smakawhat:
  you're drunk... now Dave's solo effort...
 
 
 EEEEeeesh....
This is a double sma(c)k because I'm with Smakawhat on this one.
 
 One of my favorite compilations this year is Jane's greatest hits.  Blew me away that some tracks on that album were written in the mid 80's.  
 
 "Jane Says" was written over 20 years ago!  It certainly doesn't sound anywhere near that old.  Neither does Whores, Chip Away or Pigs in Zen.  
 
 Now if we move up through Nothing's Shocking and into Ritual, then finally the mess that was Strays, I might tend to agree, but starting with the XXX release and then Nothing's Shocking - they have aged extremely well. [/b]
OK....Jane's is tricky for me just because their first two albums held so much promise of what could have been great things to come.  So in many ways, I feel more "ripped off" by them than just about any band I can think of.  Especially when you consider what a complete cheez dick Dave Navarro turned out to be and what a wanna-be svengali / pt barnum or whatever it was Perry Ferrell tried to become.
 
 Smackie, you mention some great songs, especially the ones on the live record.  Whores, 1%, even the sap that is "I Would for You".
 
 But when they tried to get funky like on "Been caught stealing" and much of the last album, yeah to me that stuff sounds dated and cheezy now. I do like the trippier stuff from the last album though.

Mobius

  • Member
  • Posts: 1319
Re: Bands/records that have not aged well
« Reply #12 on: December 15, 2006, 01:45:00 am »
I still love every song and Achtung Baby and the sum is greater than the parts.  And seeing the ZooTV show in a light rain at RFK in summer 92 was one of the great concert experiences of my life . . . but I flipped on the ZooTV live in Sydney (or somewhere in Australia) on VH1 classic the other day and jesus christ did it look retarded.

Re: Bands/records that have not aged well
« Reply #13 on: December 15, 2006, 08:09:00 am »
Nothing's Shocking still stands up as an all time favorite for me.
 
 Their other albums no llonger do itfor me.

TheREALHunter

  • Member
  • Posts: 1382
Re: Bands/records that have not aged well
« Reply #14 on: December 15, 2006, 08:56:00 am »
The Violent Femmes