pollard, i do agree with most of what joz has said in this thread, but not in the way he presented it. if you are a long-time fan of the band, you have every right to see them and criticize them. i was in no way implying that you weren't a "true" fan.
to answer your replies to which bands i said were "progressing", we could actually debate this all day. sometimes there is a fine line between "just making good records" and "progressing/evolving". the new sonic youth record is great, but it is more of a logical extension to
murray street than it is a progression from it. these statements are far from black and white and are perhaps more useful to spark discussion than accepting them as matter-of-fact.
grotty:
While it may not be universally true, I'm betting that most of the 'true fans' - that are totally happy only hearing the 2 latest records - discovered Wilco relatively late. Probably even went back and bought some Uncle Tupelo as historical research.
Otherwise, I can't comprehend how you could not want to hear some of the songs that made you love this band/artist in the 1st place.
[Assuming that you've actually moved out of Mom & Dad's house], I pity the parents of those exclaiming "Wilco is NOW! 2004 YEAH! Onward & Upward". I guess you don't often take the 'time machine' back for visit.
...prepping for the 'when I was your age' responses...
********************
I just noticed this evidence to support my theorem:
"it's too bad those of you stuck in 1999 can't take a time machine back to the summerteeth tour."
ALL THE WAY BACK to Summerteeth. Which is incidentally about 3/4's of the way through Tweedy's creative output.
what are you getting at? does the fact that i bought
a.m. in 1995 and first saw wilco on the
being there tour in 1997 disprove your notion that people that don't NEED to hear songs off their first three albums "discovered wilco relatively late?" i also have not lived with mommy and daddy since i went to college when i was 18 (this is a piss-poor insult, by the way). last i checked, wilco fans aren't in the same demographic as blink-182 fans.
i also used the
summerteeth tour as a reference because it was, arguably, the last time wilco was pretty accessible. there is a considerable jump in their sound from
sumemrteeth to
yankee hotel foxtrot. i love everything they've ever done, and i love how each record differs from the others. to be honest, in retrospect,
a.m. has plenty of good songs, but as an album, it's not such a memorable
experience, at least for me.
lastly, i love hearing the old songs, too, but i was perfectly happy with the amount they played the other night. i've seen some bands that
completely ignore their back catalog; wilco played at least five songs from their first three albums from what i remember.
perhaps i am in the minority, because i can appreciate melodious alt-country just as much as abstract, discordant noise.