Author Topic: bad pitchfork, bad!!  (Read 1592 times)

brennser

  • Member
  • Posts: 3760
bad pitchfork, bad!!
« on: June 22, 2004, 09:45:00 am »

Got Haggis?

  • Member
  • Posts: 2014
Re: bad pitchfork, bad!!
« Reply #1 on: June 22, 2004, 09:53:00 am »
they forgot to break out the thesaurus for that bit of 'news'.

loopzlp

  • Guest
Re: bad pitchfork, bad!!
« Reply #2 on: June 22, 2004, 09:55:00 am »
so will they re-review the album and give it higher marks as an appeasement?  did anyone actually read the original un-retracted review...I only got to read the retracted one, on tuesday afternoon so you'd have to have read it early tuesday morning...why was he talking re: radiohead?

Random Citizen

  • Guest
Re: bad pitchfork, bad!!
« Reply #3 on: June 22, 2004, 10:53:00 am »

loopzlp

  • Guest
Re: bad pitchfork, bad!!
« Reply #4 on: June 22, 2004, 11:25:00 am »
thanks for the link...

  • Guest
Re: bad pitchfork, bad!!
« Reply #5 on: June 22, 2004, 12:43:00 pm »
<img src="http://www.sillygirl.com/images/sillypictures/dangerboy/american_gothic.jpg" alt=" - " />

MET

  • Guest
Re: bad pitchfork, bad!!
« Reply #6 on: June 22, 2004, 01:52:00 pm »
I'm glad that review got pulled.  I'd like to hear about the record, not how cool the reviewer thinks he is.