A man in a kilt...

[LRHippo]

but just wondering what other ladies garments get you off by wearing.

Does wearing clothes get you off? I didn't realize that was their purpose. Must not take much for you.

[Charlie Nakatestes, Japanese Golfer]

So if if doesn't get you off, and you're not looking for attention, why would you do it?
 
    Do you find it more comfortable than pants? That's strange. Every woman I've ever known found pants to be more comfortable than a skirt. And shorts achieve the same comfort effect as a skirt , right?
 
    Certainly you couldn't think that skirts on guys are aesthically appealing, right? I mean the skirt was invented to flatter the female form, and boys just don't have the right figure for it. Plus, most boys just have way too much leg hair for a skirt to be flattering.
 
 

Originally posted by BrnAgnTaper:
   

but just wondering what other ladies garments get you off by wearing.

Does wearing clothes get you off? I didn't realize that was their purpose. Must not take much for you. [/b]

[markie]

Originally posted by Xavier Bush, Power Forward:
  So if if doesn't get you off, and you're not looking for attention, why would you do it?
 
     

[/QB][/QUOTE]
 
 
 Perhaps they are really inexpensive? Perhaps he cannot afford to wear more complicated clothing?

[Charlie Nakatestes, Japanese Golfer]

$185 each (plus $25 if you need the beer gut cut) is arguably not cheap...
 
    My wife wants me to dress like a Tom's of Finland dude, but I don't see that happening, even if I continue to lose weight.
 
 
 

Originally posted by MTB-Markie:
   

Originally posted by Xavier Bush, Power Forward:
  So if if doesn't get you off, and you're not looking for attention, why would you do it?
 
     

[/b]

Perhaps they are really inexpensive? Perhaps he cannot afford to wear more complicated clothing? [/QB][/QUOTE]

[kosmo vinyl]

The comfort factor in a kilt is being able let the manhood hang free and not be confined with ones trousers/shorts...
 
 And in that aspect trouser/shorts are a more natural garment for a women to wear.

[Charlie Nakatestes, Japanese Golfer]

Sort of like women who like to go around without bras?
 
 Underwear was invented for a reason...
 
 I prefer to protect the family jewels.
 
 

Originally posted by kosmo vinyl:
  The comfort factor in a kilt is being able let the manhood hang free and not be confined with ones trousers/shorts...

[Julian, Alleged Computer F**kface]

Originally posted by Xavier Bush, Power Forward:
  I prefer to protect the family jewels.
 

I, too, do not like a kilt, but I don't see how it's a protection issue.

[Charlie Nakatestes, Japanese Golfer]

Try any sort of athletic endeavor without underwear and get back to me on that one.
 
 Even just walking around, I don't need my thingies slapping around.
 
 

Originally posted by [username edited by p.c. moderator]:
   

Originally posted by Xavier Bush, Power Forward:
  I prefer to protect the family jewels.
 

I, too, do not like a kilt, but I don't see how it's a protection issue. [/b]

[kosmo vinyl]

and if protection against frost bite you are concerned with, trust me there is a reason why many don't wear underwear as it can get quite toasty under a traditional kilt.
 
 the more i wear my not-quite-a-kilt kilt, the more comfortable i find it...
 
 besides if a single guy ever wanted a potential conversation starter then wearing a kilt is it... i get asked all the time by women what i'm wearing under my mine... which if i were single could lead to "wouldn't you like to know and or find out"    
 
 and for the record i don't dangle...

[lily1]

men in kilts are hot. definitely hot. thought i had no idea that the utilikilts were that expensive!

[Charlie Nakatestes, Japanese Golfer]

Um, doesn't it really depend on the man?
 
 That's sort of like saying, "Women in miniskirts are hot. Definitely hot."
 
 

Originally posted by lily1:
  men in kilts are hot. definitely hot. thought i had no idea that the utilikilts were that expensive!

[LRHippo]

Originally posted by lily1:
  men in kilts are hot. definitely hot. thought i had no idea that the utilikilts were that expensive!

Well, of course the price quoted is on the high end. UK's start at about $105 and go up to $225. Then there is the leather at around $700. But on average, no more expensive then a pair of designer jeans or slacks.

[Charlie Nakatestes, Japanese Golfer]

Speak for yourself. I certainly don't have any $105 (and up) pants in my wardrobe, and I'm willing to wager most other boardies don't either.
 
 And if I did, I'd probably start with the pants over the kilts given that you can actually wear them to work.
 
   

Originally posted by BrnAgnTaper:
   

Originally posted by lily1:
  men in kilts are hot. definitely hot. thought i had no idea that the utilikilts were that expensive!

Well, of course the price quoted is on the high end. UK's start at about $105 and go up to $225. Then there is the leather at around $700. But on average, no more expensive then a pair of designer jeans or slacks. [/b]

[LRHippo]

Read what I said. I didn't say I owned or had any pants at that price range, but rather they are in the same range as a pair of designer jeans or dress slacks.
 
 And who says you can't wear a kilt to work?

[Charlie Nakatestes, Japanese Golfer]

I'm willing to wager that most men could not wear a kilt to work. Though I probably could.
 
 My wife was told she had to "dress less sexy" at her work, simply because she was wearing skirts that stopped a few inches above the knees. With that attitude, which I think may be the DC business enviroment norm, I don't see men in skirts being accepted.
 
 

Originally posted by BrnAgnTaper:
  Read what I said. I didn't say I owned or had any pants at that price range, but rather they are in the same range as a pair of designer jeans or dress slacks.
 
 And who says you can't wear a kilt to work?