Author Topic: Norah Jones (Read 10924 times)

sonickteam2 · « **Reply #30 on:** February 26, 2003, 03:36:00 pm »

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by BookerT: norah jones is fiona apple with a full frontal lobotomy.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>dont say that sort of thing about Fiona Apple.thats mean!

sonickteam2 · « **Reply #31 on:** February 26, 2003, 03:38:00 pm »

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by ggw: Alicia Keys Jody Watley Marc Cohn Ric Astley Shelby LynneThis is the fate that awaits Norah Jones. Her second album will sell well on the coattails of the first, but in ten years, the only place you'll find her is an a "Best of the 'Oughts" compilation.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>can we add Fiona Apple to that list. Cause i love her, but where the hell is she??gone i suppose

Charlie Nakatestes, Japanese Golfer · « **Reply #32 on:** February 26, 2003, 03:44:00 pm »

Shelby Lynne's album that won her best new artist was actually her sixth album. Unfortunately, she tried to go in a more rock oriented approach on her follow up, and it blew. I still think she'll makae strong comeback. As for the other artist on the list, they simply lacked talent. I think Norah has more talent than them, and will be on the cusp in the resurgance of roots music for several albums to come.

markie · « **Reply #33 on:** February 26, 2003, 04:09:00 pm »

<A HREF="http://www.rockonthenet.com/grammy/newartist.htm" TARGET=_blank>http://www.rockonthenet.com/grammy/newartist.htm[/url] its a list of the best new artists....If you were not picked between the mid60's and mid 70's it appears to be a kiss of death.Sheryl Crow and Sade are the only people who stand out to me at least as exceptions.

Charlie Nakatestes, Japanese Golfer · « **Reply #34 on:** February 26, 2003, 04:12:00 pm »

Mariah and Christina still appear to be going strong...Plus, what if Norah's next album only sells a quarter of what this one does. Does that make her a failure? I don't think the album was intended to be a major selling album anyway. Released on the Blue Note jazz label, I think the intention was to find a small, comfortable niche market.[This message has been edited by Rhett Miller (edited 02-26-2003).]

markie · « **Reply #35 on:** February 26, 2003, 04:19:00 pm »

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by Rhett Miller: Mariah and Christina still appear to be going strong...Plus, what if Norah's next album only sells a quarter of what this one does. Does that make her a failure? I don't think the album was intended to be a major selling album anyway. Released on the Blue Note jazz label, I think the intention was to find a small, comfortable niche market.[This message has been edited by Rhett Miller (edited 02-26-2003).]<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>Christina is still shifting product,but has got much worse musically. Mariah is dead and gone, getting dropped by EMI sealed her fate. Norah Jones sold 5 million albums in the US. If the next sells 1.25 million I doubt she will be heading back to a trailer park.

paige · « **Reply #36 on:** February 26, 2003, 05:02:00 pm »

i'm a bit late into this discussion... and i'm too lazy to read every post, but did anyone recall when Lauryn Hill was this huge deal and she won about 852 grammys for that one album, and then she just kind of dropped off the face of the earth? will that happen with nora jones?

Celeste · « **Reply #37 on:** February 26, 2003, 05:07:00 pm »

Lauryn Hill was pretty "successful" with the Fugees before her solo project.Like Jones, just because she "drops off the face of the earth" doesn't mean the work that was recognized was no good.I think Lauryn Hill's Miseducation and Jone's record are both very solid!

Charlie Nakatestes, Japanese Golfer · « **Reply #38 on:** February 26, 2003, 05:08:00 pm »

Are you sure? I thought her Unplugged album from last year was well received...but I don't know enough about her to say for certain. <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by paige: i'm a bit late into this discussion... and i'm too lazy to read every post, but did anyone recall when Lauryn Hill was this huge deal and she won about 852 grammys for that one album, and then she just kind of dropped off the face of the earth? will that happen with nora jones?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

paige · « **Reply #39 on:** February 26, 2003, 05:09:00 pm »

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by Celeste: Lauryn Hill was pretty "successful" with the Fugees before her solo project.Like Jones, just because she "drops off the face of the earth" doesn't mean the work that was recognized was no good.I think Lauryn Hill's Miseducation and Jone's record are both very solid!<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>i know i know... and yeah the fugees were/are pretty popular. i just mean that Hill's solo career was made out to be this prolific thing (and her record did do very well and isn't bad) but then it just kind of ... pleh. you know? i really like nora jones, her voice is great and she doesn't seem to get caught up in all the stupid music industry crap. i just hope she can keep up with how fast the media is moving or she'll get lost in the shuffle

Fico · « **Reply #40 on:** February 26, 2003, 05:20:00 pm »

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by Henry Dark: Granted, someone in my party (not me) complained that the audience was full of yuppies, but hey this is DC. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>I don't get what the whinning about yuppies is all about.. If I started making double or triple of what I'm earning right now and fall into the yuppie category I'd still like the same music and go to shows.. I don't understand the resentment of the fookin lazy and broke... I'd rather be a yuppie than a hippie ...

Celeste · « **Reply #41 on:** February 26, 2003, 05:32:00 pm »

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by Fico: I don't get what the whinning about yuppies is all about.. If I started making double or triple of what I'm earning right now and fall into the yuppie category I'd still like the same music and go to shows.. I don't understand the resentment of the fookin lazy and broke... I'd rather be a yuppie than a hippie ...<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>Maybe cause they were smoking fucking cigars and yapping on their phones and made numerous trips back and forth from the bar to buy their cheesy little tonic drinks? Don't know for sure...Also, how much money you make doesn't make one a "yuppie"...it's more like your attitude...however, I think the term is kind of outdated and I, for one, am going to try to come up with something better and more appropriately descriptive to call those oblivious richer than me types

walkman · « **Reply #42 on:** February 26, 2003, 07:35:00 pm »

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by Rhett Miller: Are you sure? I thought her Unplugged album from last year was well received...but I don't know enough about her to say for certain. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>The Unplugged album (ahem...double album) was shite. 10 minute rambles showcasing shocking levels of pretension. Full-on self-destructive mode. That's a real concern for a talent like Norah Jones.

smakawhat · « **Reply #43 on:** February 26, 2003, 09:51:00 pm »

Someone I know had the best term for those people and I do agree yuppie is a bit dated, but here is the term someone used and I absolutely love it (mostly towards women).."resume chasers" <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by Celeste: Also, how much money you make doesn't make one a "yuppie"...it's more like your attitude...however, I think the term is kind of outdated and I, for one, am going to try to come up with something better and more appropriately descriptive to call those oblivious richer than me types<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

News:

Author Topic: Norah Jones (Read 10924 times)

sonickteam2

Re: Norah Jones

sonickteam2

Re: Norah Jones

Charlie Nakatestes, Japanese Golfer

Re: Norah Jones

markie

Re: Norah Jones

Charlie Nakatestes, Japanese Golfer

Re: Norah Jones

markie

Re: Norah Jones

paige

Re: Norah Jones

Celeste

Re: Norah Jones

Charlie Nakatestes, Japanese Golfer

Re: Norah Jones

paige

Re: Norah Jones

Fico

Re: Norah Jones

Celeste

Re: Norah Jones

walkman

Re: Norah Jones

smakawhat

Re: Norah Jones