Originally posted by miss pretentious:
I have never ever been able to 'get' U2 and Pink Floyd.
(Sorry Director!)
It's okay, sweety. I still like you in spite of your gaping, inherent flaws. Cool as a fan. Yes, without a doubt. Perfect, no.
Originally posted by RatBastard:
2) U2... Talent never visited these guys. Bone-Oh has an ego bigger than the spruce goose and they are all arrogant meglomaniacs. The fact that people give any creedence to his opinion on world matters floors me. Whats a no talent lead singer in a half ass pseudo rock band have to do with anything other than feeding his ego?
WHOA! WHOA! Pump your brakes here, fam. I understand that the "bombast" of what it is that U2 does turns some off. Nothing wrong with that. Sweeping, anthemic rock isn't necessarily some people's cup of tea. I respect that as well. But for you to say that they're talentless is purely fucking asinine. Larry & Adam are at LEAST a solid rhythm section, and The Edge is easily one of the greatest players to pick up an axe. In the interest of being objective, I'll keep my opinion on where Bono sits in the pantheon of lead singers to myself. I cannot deny that Bono definitely has an ego. But last I checked so did Mick Jagger & Dylan. Greatness tends to buy you a pass on that. But the caveat there is NEITHER of those two are feeding hungry children in Africa. Regardless of what you think about his "no-talent shitty pseudo rock band", those 4 men, not just Bono, have tirelessly dedicated to their time & effort to MANY humanitarian causes. How can you hate on people trying to leave the world in better shape than they found it?
You can't do bumps & fuck groupies all the time, can you??? There's only so much Jack Daniels to go around . . . :roll: