rolling stones take the cake, icing, and all the shit in

[ggw]

Originally posted by The Artist Formerly Known As grotty:
   

Originally posted by HoyaParanoia:
    "exile on main street"

the album cover photo should be in the dictionary next the definition of OVERRATED [/b]

You mean replace Thom Yorke's photo??

[grotty]

Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
   

Originally posted by The Artist Formerly Known As grotty:
     

Originally posted by HoyaParanoia:
    "exile on main street"

the album cover photo should be in the dictionary next the definition of OVERRATED [/b]

You mean replace Thom Yorke's photo?? [/b]

I like Thom. You don't?
 I think he's relevant.
 
 Exile isn't even one of the Rolling Stones best records...forget about an all-time classic.
 
 Bettered by:
 Sticky Fingers
 Beggars Banquet
 Let It Bleed
 Some Girls
 
 An excellent "relevant" essay appears in Kill Your Idols:
 
 Keith Moerer, in a much-needed screed against the Rolling Stones' bloated Exile on Main Street, fearlessly says what has needed to be said for so long--that Exile isn't the culmination of a four-album run of classics but the beginning of a "songwriting and musical decline,"

[HoyaSaxa03]

<img src="http://www.drudgereport.com/mick.jpg" alt=" - " />
 
 look up "relevant" in the dictionary, and this is what you get
 
 =)

[walkonby]

wow . . . mick, mick, mick?!  and here i thought making fun of the way cher looks, was an amusing passage of time at parties.  i see this new  victim will do just fine, by me.  but still not worth four hundred.  mci is not the place to shoot for the cheap seats.

[Dr. Anton Phibes]

What a bargain!!!!
 
 
 http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=16122&item=6531463801&rd=1

[sonickteam2]

Originally posted by HoyaParanoia:
  logic or original idea

trust me, i would never mistake any of your posts as that.

[HoyaSaxa03]

Originally posted by sonickteam3:
   

Originally posted by HoyaParanoia:
  logic or original idea

trust me, i would never mistake any of your posts as that. [/b]

burn!!!
 
 you know we're not so different, you and i

[HoyaSaxa03]

Originally posted by Jonas Grumby:
  What a bargain!!!!
 

i think this is the bigger bargain

[sonickteam2]

Originally posted by HoyaParanoia:
 
 you know we're not so different, you and i

you're scaring me!!  

[rsantos17]

lots of stones bashing here, but how many of you would pay 50$ to see them in a club. They did that in the last tour, and they're doing it again...it might even be this club... Tickets don't seem so overpriced now do they?

[Random Citizen]

Originally posted by rsantos17:
  lots of stones bashing here, but how many of you would pay 50$ to see them in a club. They did that in the last tour, and they're doing it again...it might even be this club... Tickets don't seem so overpriced now do they?

<img src="http://www.nyapplecountry.com/images/photosvarieties/braeburn72.jpg" alt=" - " />  meet  <img src="http://www.floridafarmbureau.org/images/orange.jpg" alt=" - " />

[K8teebug]

when I was in Dublin last year, I was all prepared to spend money on the bootlegs in the town.  But, my husband and I only found 2 stores that carried them.  Turns out that when the Rolling Stones were in Dublin, they had the record stores raided for bootlegs.  
 
 Since then I haven't really liked them all that much.

[kosmo vinyl]

Originally posted by rsantos17:
  lots of stones bashing here, but how many of you would pay 50$ to see them in a club. They did that in the last tour, and they're doing it again...it might even be this club... Tickets don't seem so overpriced now do they?

that is until the ticket brokers get thier hands on them...

[edbert]

I paid $90+15x2 or so to attend the "Tommy Hilfiger Presents The Rolling Stones No Security Tour" at MCI; which I later regretted not because of the performance but because of my realization that it's just a night out. Anyway I wouldn't be surprised if they get another corporate sponsor again this time despite the high ticket prices.  As I recall not all of the $300 floor seats at that show were sold... or maybe they were sold to brokers who couldn't move them.  So it'll be interesting to see how the $450 seats do.

Originally posted by rsantos17:
  how many of you would pay 50$ to see them in a club. They did that in the last tour, and they're doing it again...it might even be this club... Tickets don't seem so overpriced now do they?

They do when you consider that Bill Wyman won't be there.