Author Topic: The Nats Thread  (Read 380939 times)

stevewizzle

  • Guest
Re: The Nats Thread
« Reply #480 on: October 08, 2014, 04:21:09 pm »
i don't get it
Blaming management when an individual doesn't get their job done.

i mean, i'd also blame the walking corpse that is adam laroche, drew storen for hanging that pitch, anthony rendon for not charging that bunt, the pitchers mound at giants stadium, mccatty for not having a mound visit before gio walks the first run home, cabrera for getting kicked out of the game and sticking us with espinosa for the rest of the game, and the umpire for squeezing zim in the 9th.

but the pivotal moment was pulling zimm. there was no coming back after that.
What if all those other plays went the Nats way? Would pulling Zimm still have lost the series?

probably? baseball is a funny game.

DeathFromAbove1979

  • Member
  • Posts: 5038
    • Twitter
Re: The Nats Thread
« Reply #481 on: October 08, 2014, 05:12:47 pm »
Nope. Zimm. That was it. They lost it right there.
‼‼?‼‼

hutch

  • Guest
Re: The Nats Thread
« Reply #482 on: October 08, 2014, 05:30:33 pm »
at least Harper had a breakout post-season.... maybe he's over the hump...imagine if he kept that up next year?

DeathFromAbove1979

  • Member
  • Posts: 5038
    • Twitter
Re: The Nats Thread
« Reply #483 on: October 09, 2014, 10:31:24 am »
at least Harper had a breakout post-season.... maybe he's over the hump...imagine if he kept that up next year?
He was on pace for, let's say... 8 homers in the playoffs? If they went all the way. That's huge. If they won all the games I mean.
‼‼?‼‼

James Ford

  • Member
  • Posts: 5620
Re: The Nats Thread
« Reply #484 on: October 09, 2014, 10:45:32 am »
He won't.

He'll stub his toe on some artificial turf, miss 40 games, and get like 43 rbi in the 110 games he does play.

at least Harper had a breakout post-season.... maybe he's over the hump...imagine if he kept that up next year?

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: The Nats Thread
« Reply #485 on: October 09, 2014, 11:32:23 am »
I don't think Hunter Strickland was going to pitch to Harper again, so I'm not sure it's fair to say that he would have kept up that pace.
27>34

shemptiness

  • Member
  • Posts: 3332
Re: The Nats Thread
« Reply #486 on: October 09, 2014, 11:38:52 am »
Since 1995, only five teams had a lower on-base percentage than the Nationals did this year in the NLDS. Just two had a lower batting average.

DeathFromAbove1979

  • Member
  • Posts: 5038
    • Twitter
Re: The Nats Thread
« Reply #487 on: October 09, 2014, 01:37:58 pm »
Since 1995, only five teams had a lower on-base percentage than the Nationals did this year in the NLDS. Just two had a lower batting average.
Was one of the lower batting acg teams the Giants?
‼‼?‼‼

shemptiness

  • Member
  • Posts: 3332
Re: The Nats Thread
« Reply #488 on: October 09, 2014, 02:19:50 pm »
Since 1995, only five teams had a lower on-base percentage than the Nationals did this year in the NLDS. Just two had a lower batting average.
Was one of the lower batting acg teams the Giants?

Reds 2010 and Dodgers 1996

DeathFromAbove1979

  • Member
  • Posts: 5038
    • Twitter
Re: The Nats Thread
« Reply #489 on: October 09, 2014, 03:58:18 pm »
Since 1995, only five teams had a lower on-base percentage than the Nationals did this year in the NLDS. Just two had a lower batting average.
Was one of the lower batting acg teams the Giants?

Reds 2010 and Dodgers 1996
Dang. Where were the Giants? They weren't much better than us.
‼‼?‼‼

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: The Nats Thread
« Reply #490 on: October 11, 2014, 01:35:27 pm »
27>34

hutch

  • Guest

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: The Nats Thread
« Reply #492 on: October 17, 2014, 07:44:08 pm »
Mike (Long Island)

How concerned are you that Bryce Harper may never exhibit enough emotional maturity for people to give him whatever credit he may be due? He may be one of the best arguments against home schooling ever (perhaps a little association with people other than his dad might have helped him)

David Schoenfield  (4:36 PM)

He's 21.
27>34

DeathFromAbove1979

  • Member
  • Posts: 5038
    • Twitter
Re: The Nats Thread
« Reply #493 on: October 20, 2014, 11:11:25 am »
^^^ He turned 22 a coupls days ago. The whole "He's immature" thing is so stupid. He's still INSANELY young. In the entire Nationals organization, I believe there is only 1 or 2 people way down in their farm systems that are younger. That's so crazy.
‼‼?‼‼

hutch

  • Guest
Re: The Nats Thread
« Reply #494 on: October 30, 2014, 10:16:14 pm »
Nats decline Laroche and Soriano options.... pick up Span...

Does this mean they are moving Zim to first?