Author Topic: The Nats Thread  (Read 306544 times)

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19716
Re: The Nats Thread
« Reply #1095 on: December 01, 2016, 01:51:26 pm »
McCuthcheon to the Nats is all but finished, I'm being told.
27>34

hutch

  • Guest
Re: The Nats Thread
« Reply #1096 on: December 01, 2016, 01:59:44 pm »
McCuthcheon to the Nats is all but finished, I'm being told.

nice

shemptiness

  • Member
  • Posts: 3288
Re: The Nats Thread
« Reply #1097 on: December 01, 2016, 02:10:47 pm »

shemptiness

  • Member
  • Posts: 3288

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19716
Re: The Nats Thread
« Reply #1099 on: December 05, 2016, 04:06:22 pm »
Nats Taken Back by Bryce Harper's Extension Request

"Harper, according to the executive, is asking for a record deal that will exceed 10 years in length, and likely pay him in excess of $400 million."

One other thing: Trout is not represented by Scott Boras.  Have fun!
« Last Edit: December 05, 2016, 04:13:18 pm by vansmack »
27>34

hutch

  • Guest
Re: The Nats Thread
« Reply #1100 on: December 05, 2016, 04:52:34 pm »
Nats Taken Back by Bryce Harper's Extension Request

"Harper, according to the executive, is asking for a record deal that will exceed 10 years in length, and likely pay him in excess of $400 million."

One other thing: Trout is not represented by Scott Boras.  Have fun!

let him go..

DeathFromAbove1979

  • Member
  • Posts: 5038
    • Twitter
Re: The Nats Thread
« Reply #1101 on: December 06, 2016, 11:12:20 am »
Nats Taken Back by Bryce Harper's Extension Request

"Harper, according to the executive, is asking for a record deal that will exceed 10 years in length, and likely pay him in excess of $400 million."

One other thing: Trout is not represented by Scott Boras.  Have fun!

let him go..
If he has another season like this last one they sure will!
‼‼?‼‼

Space Freely

  • Member
  • Posts: 9935
Re: The Nats Thread
« Reply #1102 on: December 07, 2016, 09:46:47 pm »
White Sox rob the Nats...should have just kept Espinosa n kept Turner in center rather than losing those future pitching studs.

And they're counting on a guy who hit .186 last year to replace Ramos? Not impressed with offseason so far.
« Last Edit: December 07, 2016, 09:51:28 pm by Space Freely »

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19716
Re: The Nats Thread
« Reply #1103 on: December 10, 2016, 11:15:10 pm »
Angels send RHPs Kyle McGowin and Austin Adams to Nationals in exchange for Espinosa
27>34

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19716
Re: The Nats Thread
« Reply #1104 on: December 24, 2016, 12:44:53 pm »
Any other failed Nats who's salary you'd like to dump on Anaheim?

Ben Revere signs one year, $4m deal with the Angels
27>34

hutch

  • Guest
Re: The Nats Thread
« Reply #1105 on: December 24, 2016, 01:52:31 pm »
Any other failed Nats who's salary you'd like to dump on Anaheim?

Ben Revere signs one year, $4m deal with the Angels

Bryce?

shemptiness

  • Member
  • Posts: 3288
Re: The Nats Thread
« Reply #1106 on: December 24, 2016, 11:17:05 pm »
Any other failed Nats who's salary you'd like to dump on Anaheim?

Ben Revere signs one year, $4m deal with the Angels

That's a Duquette special - anticipating a bounce back year and getting a player on the cheap.  I guess $4M is cheap.  I really don't know anymore.   

shemptiness

  • Member
  • Posts: 3288
Re: The Nats Thread
« Reply #1107 on: February 21, 2017, 12:51:24 pm »
Wieters 2 years $21M

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19716
Re: The Nats Thread
« Reply #1108 on: February 21, 2017, 01:11:26 pm »
Wieters 2 years $21M

I'm shocked he got more than one year ($10m/17 and $11m/18).  Even more surprised HE can opt out after year one.

I thought one year, $15m for sure.
27>34

hutch

  • Guest
Re: The Nats Thread
« Reply #1109 on: February 28, 2017, 10:24:05 pm »
nats sign joe blanton.. 1 year

UPDATE: The salary structure is kind of odd. Barry Svrluga of the Washington Post reports that Blanton will get only $1 million in 2017, plus some incentives, and will have $1 million deferred to 2018 and $2 million deferred to 2019.