Author Topic: Required reading  (Read 6493 times)

eddie

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 5158
Required reading
« on: February 23, 2003, 03:32:00 pm »
There will be a quiz at the end of it all.  <A HREF="http://www.alternet.org/print.html?StoryID=12880" TARGET=_blank>http://www.alternet.org/print.html?StoryID=12880[/url]

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: Required reading
« Reply #1 on: February 23, 2003, 03:54:00 pm »
Protest music may be dead, or at least out of the public eye, but if you can endure the annual trainwreck known as the Grammys tonight, I bet you'll be hearing a lot of political statements from musicians.<P>

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: Required reading
« Reply #2 on: February 23, 2003, 09:58:00 pm »
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Arial, Veranda">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by ggw:<BR><B>Protest music may be dead, or at least out of the public eye, but if you can endure the annual trainwreck known as the Grammys tonight, I bet you'll be hearing a lot of political statements from musicians.<P>  </B><HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P>Thus far you're right - VH1 has taken over the Grammy's.  James Taylor, Simon and Garfunkel (good to see on stage together though), John Mayer, Vanessa Carlton, Norah Jones, ZZzzzzzz<P>Thank god for yummy Gwen and No Doubt.
27>34

markie

  • Member
  • Posts: 13178
Re: Required reading
« Reply #3 on: February 23, 2003, 10:04:00 pm »
UMMM, yes Gwen did look a bit tasty tonight.

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: Required reading
« Reply #4 on: February 23, 2003, 10:22:00 pm »
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Arial, Veranda">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by markie:<BR><B>UMMM, yes Gwen did look a bit tasty tonight.</B><HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P>I was screamnig for her to take her jacket off - Anaheim wins grammy - woohoo!<P>And then there was coldplay.....<P>Two grammy's and we didn't see them.  Interesting.  But Politik sounds pretty damn good with the philharmonic.<P>And of course the anti-war protest on Chris Martins hand and the side of the piano (so we don't get off topic).
27>34

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: Required reading
« Reply #5 on: February 23, 2003, 10:27:00 pm »
We need a soy bomb.<P>

myuman

  • Guest
Re: Required reading
« Reply #6 on: February 23, 2003, 10:33:00 pm »
Misguided as usual.... hopefully miss crowe and others will rely on the "intelligence" that got them millions rather than their political lack of intelligence.  I heard CBS is making a stand claiming they will pull the plug on any socialistic chatter coming out of the performers mouths.<P> <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Arial, Veranda">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by ggw:<BR><B>    </B><HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P>

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: Required reading
« Reply #7 on: February 23, 2003, 10:38:00 pm »
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Arial, Veranda">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by myuman:<BR><B>Misguided as usual.... hopefully miss crowe and others will rely on the "intelligence" that got them millions rather than their political lack of intelligence.  I heard CBS is making a stand claiming they will pull the plug on any socialistic chatter coming out of the performers mouths.</B><HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P>CBS had to reverse themselves on that:<BR> <A HREF="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/story/61601p-57554c.html" TARGET=_blank>http://www.nydailynews.com/news/story/61601p-57554c.html[/url] <BR>

markie

  • Member
  • Posts: 13178
Re: Required reading
« Reply #8 on: February 23, 2003, 10:40:00 pm »
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Arial, Veranda">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by myuman:<BR><B>Misguided as usual.<P> </B><HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P>well yes, I wish CBS were around before your post.<P>Isnt censorship great, which ammendment gives freedom of speech and since when was CBS the arbiter of good taste?

markie

  • Member
  • Posts: 13178
Re: Required reading
« Reply #9 on: February 23, 2003, 10:41:00 pm »
thanks GGW, I hadnt seen that.

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: Required reading
« Reply #10 on: February 23, 2003, 10:41:00 pm »
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Arial, Veranda">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by markie:<BR><B> well yes, I wish CBS were around before your post.<P>Isnt censorship great, which ammendment gives freedom of speech and since when was CBS the arbiter of good taste?</B><HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P>I think they are the arbiter of what you say on their network.

jadetree

  • Member
  • Posts: 3161
Re: Required reading
« Reply #11 on: February 23, 2003, 10:47:00 pm »
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Arial, Veranda">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by ggw:<BR><B> I think they are the arbiter of what you say on their network.</B><HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P>I don't think it is as cut and dry as that, or the FCC would not get to regulate them.  Does censoring anti-war language help them be considered a "good citizen".

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: Required reading
« Reply #12 on: February 23, 2003, 10:50:00 pm »
Fred Durst goes first.<P>I lost in the pool - I had Chris Martin (maybe if we had seen their acceptance speech).  It was voted that his "hand protest" didn't count.  Bollocks!<P>
27>34

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: Required reading
« Reply #13 on: February 23, 2003, 10:50:00 pm »
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Arial, Veranda">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by jadetree:<BR><B> I don't think it is as cut and dry as that, or the FCC would not get to regulate them.  Does censoring anti-war language help them be considered a "good citizen".</B><HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P>No it's not as cut and dry as that, but if they wanted to pull the plug on musicians spouting off at a music awards show, that would be within their rights.

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: Required reading
« Reply #14 on: February 23, 2003, 10:52:00 pm »
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Arial, Veranda">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by vansmack:<BR><B>Fred Durst goes first.<BR></B><HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P>If Durst is the voice for the anti-war movement, Saddam should head for the bunker right now.