Originally posted by bearman:
Personally, I listen to punk all the time, even now. X-Ray Spex, the Germs, the Buzzcocks, the Damned, etc. It's great music. Guess that makes me a relic according to some folks. True that punk took itself too seriously by the early 80's, but the initial run of it was pretty fantastic.
I guess the delineation would be that punk as a living organism, has perhaps died to a certain extent but the nostalgia for it as a music genre is alive and well and comes to the fore every few years as a new generation of "kids" "discover" it.
But really if punk died, it was when it was identified as PUNK. While its most associated with and recognized as a musical genre, it was more an attitude whether as straight up anti-establishment, DIY, or simply contrarian.
In my youth punk was generic, as in not mainstream, but the music was further defined as hardcore, thrash, etc. What's now seen as "new wave" was still punk to us.
There are people that seem to try and assert a punk ethic (Amy Winehouse, Pete Doherty, etc.) but it rings hollow and contrived.
I think Public Enemy were/are punks, I think Ani Difranco is a punk, I think phuckin Bjork is a punk...so is it alive or dead I guess that depends on your age and perspective, but in the end the Sex Pistols were a pimple on the ass of music cultural history they represent what people want to believe a certain era was about rather than what it really was.
Siouxsie Sioux, Robert Smith, Morrissey, Thurston Moore, KRS-One, etc. are far more emblematic of what Punk is/was/should be than the Sex Pistols ever were.