Author Topic: Coachella 2005  (Read 11397 times)

sonickteam2

  • Guest
Re: Coachella 2005
« Reply #45 on: January 31, 2005, 12:51:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Rhett Miller:
  All bands exist as money making endeavors.  Even the crappy ones I listen to who don't make much money.
you really pride yourself on liking bands that no one else likes and dont make any money
 
 why is that?

Re: Coachella 2005
« Reply #46 on: January 31, 2005, 01:00:00 pm »
I was just joking.
 
 95% of the bands I go see are at either Iota, Black Cat, or 9:30 Club, and are by nationally touring acts with records deals and radio exposure.
 
 Doesn't mean they are as popular as Radiohead, but in the grand scheme of things, given how many bands there are out there, I think the bands I like are relatively popular.
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by sonickteam2:
   
Quote
Originally posted by Rhett Miller:
  All bands exist as money making endeavors.  Even the crappy ones I listen to who don't make much money.
you really pride yourself on liking bands that no one else likes and dont make any money
 
 why is that? [/b]

Celeste

  • Guest
Re: Coachella 2005
« Reply #47 on: January 31, 2005, 01:03:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by BookerT:
  who would you rather see in 2005, bobby bare jr. or, say, roger mcguinn?
come again?

Re: Coachella 2005
« Reply #48 on: January 31, 2005, 01:10:00 pm »
Perhaps a more clearly defined example would be"Who would you rather see in 2005, Bobby Bare Jr or Bobby Bare Sr?"
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by Celeste:
   
Quote
Originally posted by BookerT:
  who would you rather see in 2005, bobby bare jr. or, say, roger mcguinn?
come again? [/b]

bearman🐻

  • Member
  • Posts: 5461
Re: Coachella 2005
« Reply #49 on: January 31, 2005, 01:12:00 pm »
I'm rather surprised that Queens of the Stone Age and Interpol aren't playing this year. I wonder if there's a chance they still still add a few names on.

joz

  • Member
  • Posts: 492
Re: Coachella 2005
« Reply #50 on: January 31, 2005, 01:20:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by bunnyman:
  I'm rather surprised that Queens of the Stone Age and Interpol aren't playing this year. I wonder if there's a chance they still still add a few names on.
franz ferdinand too.

distance

  • Member
  • Posts: 1241
Re: Coachella 2005
« Reply #51 on: January 31, 2005, 02:14:00 pm »
i told my girlfriend.   she wants to go, but all the stuff we want to see is in the evening so we wouldn't have to worry about the heat if we went this year.
 we want to see coldplay, new order and bauhaus as far as the bigger bands go.  if they end up having their own shows (even if they are on the west coast) around that time i really feel like it'd be better to go to those than to go to coachella.

bearman🐻

  • Member
  • Posts: 5461
Re: Coachella 2005
« Reply #52 on: January 31, 2005, 02:46:00 pm »
Given how many people I know going to Coachella and given how well-organized a festival it is, I am actually looking forward to just being there. I bet that neither night will sell out this year either. I don't think enough people will want to travel again this year and most of the folks that go will be West Coast since it's less of a big deal to travel. I think it's a great line-up, but you would be SHOCKED at how many people still haven't heard of Coachella (of course, those people probably would never travel to a festival across the country either). I personally hope that fewer people show up...that will mean easier to park and easier to get out when the show's over!

lily1

  • Member
  • Posts: 2137
Re: Coachella 2005
« Reply #53 on: January 31, 2005, 10:06:00 pm »
tegan and sara? wtf? that's just wrong! WRONG!

ChampionshipVinyl

  • Member
  • Posts: 314
Re: Coachella 2005
« Reply #54 on: January 31, 2005, 11:08:00 pm »
I'd go if it were on the east coast. The line-up does excite me as a whole like last year's.

sonickteam2

  • Guest
Re: Coachella 2005
« Reply #55 on: February 01, 2005, 09:54:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by lily1:
  tegan and sara? wtf? that's just wrong! WRONG!
isnt it?   and Thrice? not cool.  in fact there are several question marks on that lineup.

Re: Coachella 2005
« Reply #56 on: February 01, 2005, 10:04:00 am »
But Bigyawn said they were one of the best of 2004!
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by lily1:
  tegan and sara? wtf? that's just wrong! WRONG!

sonickteam2

  • Guest
Re: Coachella 2005
« Reply #57 on: February 01, 2005, 10:32:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by Rhett Miller:
  But Bigyawn said they were one of the best of 2004!
 
bigyawn didnt really mean that.  Bigyawn is just in its early stages of life.  sooner or later it will have enough courage to try and be a LITTLE different from all the other online magazine type sites.....that Tegan and Sara is like a modern Indigo Girls...

Julian, Alleged Computer F**kface

  • Member
  • Posts: 5970
  • JULIAN'S AMERICA - It makes my taco pop!
Re: Coachella 2005
« Reply #58 on: February 01, 2005, 10:50:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by Rhett Miller:
  But Bigyawn said they were one of the best of 2004!
 
Hey, give us some credit - at least we didn't include garbage like the latest Old 97's record.

Re: Coachella 2005
« Reply #59 on: February 01, 2005, 10:53:00 am »
I bet if Tegan and Sara had Indigo Girls haircuts, they'd be nowhere in the indie press.
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by sonickteam2:
   
Quote
Originally posted by Rhett Miller:
  But Bigyawn said they were one of the best of 2004!
 
bigyawn didnt really mean that.  Bigyawn is just in its early stages of life.  sooner or later it will have enough courage to try and be a LITTLE different from all the other online magazine type sites.....that Tegan and Sara is like a modern Indigo Girls... [/b]