930 Forums

=> GENERAL DISCUSSION => Topic started by: Relaxer on February 03, 2010, 11:04:30 am

Title: joanna newsom
Post by: Relaxer on February 03, 2010, 11:04:30 am
Who's going to the 6th and I shows? I'm trying to decide whether to drop $30+ on a show that might be a snooze but might also be a trascendent experience (a la the Antony show a year ago)

Also, her new one is going to be a triple-CD, and the tracks on Drag City are interesting. Ys also an interesting album and I've played it a few times recently.


CD1
1. Easy (06:04)
2. Have One On Me (11:02)
3. '81 (03:51)
4. Good Intentions Paving Company (07:02)
5. No Provenance (06:25)
6. Baby Birch (09:30)
Total: 43:54

CD2
1. On A Good Day (01:48 )
2. You And Me, Bess (07:12)
3. In California (08:41)
4. Jackrabbits (04:23)
5. Go Long (08:02)
6. Occident (05:31)
Total: 35:37

CD3
1. Soft As Chalk (06:29)
2. Esme (07:56)
3. Autumn (08:01)
4. Ribbon Bows (06:10)
5. Kingfisher (09:11)
6. Does Not Suffice (06:44)
Total: 42:31

Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: nkotb on February 03, 2010, 11:06:06 am
I'll be there...about 95% certain.  Gotta admit though, hearing that this is a three-disc album has me less than psyched.  Ys is great and all, but doesn't compare to her first album, IMO. 
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: James Ford on February 03, 2010, 11:13:30 am
How into her would you guys be if she looked like Susan Boyle?
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: Relaxer on February 03, 2010, 11:13:49 am
First show is sold out, second still has tix available.
What to do, what to do. Reviews of her recent shows have been extremely positive, and it just might be awesome at 6th and I.
nkotb, are you going Mon or Tues?

Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: Relaxer on February 03, 2010, 11:21:55 am
(http://userserve-ak.last.fm/serve/_/5967986/Joanna+Newsom+bathroom.jpg)

she is pretty smokin, to be sure, but she and susan boyle are coming at this in two different ways
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: Vas Deferens on February 03, 2010, 11:26:13 am
show will be with a six piece string section.........i've only seen her solo 3 or 4 times....looking forward to it.

do it relaxer!

going to first show, contemplating about the second show also :)
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: azaghal1981 on February 03, 2010, 11:32:11 am
Unitarian Church for me.

Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: nkotb on February 03, 2010, 11:39:46 am
I'm going Monday.  Rhett, I can't answer your question.  I think the first time I heard her, it was live.  I think she's grown into her look a bit...browsing through old photos of her from the first album, she didn't look that great.

First show is sold out, second still has tix available.
What to do, what to do. Reviews of her recent shows have been extremely positive, and it just might be awesome at 6th and I.
nkotb, are you going Mon or Tues?


Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: Firebutt McGee on February 03, 2010, 03:49:57 pm
Oh, it's gonna be good! I fly in from SXSW that day (Monday), and I'm doing a Joanna Newsom/Spoon double-play! Will. Be. Amazing.
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: Relaxer on February 03, 2010, 03:53:44 pm
Oh very well
Bought two tickets
If nothing else, I'll scalp the SHIT out of them. "Come see the best ass to ever play a harp! It sings too!"

(http://www.collider.com/uploads/imageGallery/Andy_Samberg/andy_samberg_image.jpg)

Can you believe that this is the man who gets to touch that amazing booty?
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: azaghal1981 on February 03, 2010, 04:26:17 pm
Not as amazing as your rendition of "Emily" which I expect you to have completely memorized by tomorrow!

Oh, it's gonna be good! I fly in from SXSW that day (Monday), and I'm doing a Joanna Newsom/Spoon double-play! Will. Be. Amazing.
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: Vas Deferens on February 04, 2010, 11:03:25 am
the question is: are we gonna meet her backstage .... you up for it?  ;D

Oh, it's gonna be good! I fly in from SXSW that day (Monday), and I'm doing a Joanna Newsom/Spoon double-play! Will. Be. Amazing.
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: RustyOrgan on February 04, 2010, 03:13:21 pm
I'd like to taste her tampon.
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: Julian, Alleged Computer F**kface on February 04, 2010, 03:35:05 pm
I'd like to taste her tampon.
Wow, just took things to a whole new (disgusting) level.
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: sweetcell on February 04, 2010, 03:58:42 pm
i couldn't even come up with a zingy reply.  that was gross - not clever, not funny, not insightful, nothing... just plain gross.
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: Relaxer on February 22, 2010, 11:23:35 am
Has anyone who ordered 6th and I tix received them yet? I ordered maybe three weeks ago and haven't seen them yet, but I'm also afraid I threw them out.

New album leaked by the way. Its pretty good but is an awful lot to take in. I see it growing on me though.
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: bellenseb on February 22, 2010, 11:31:44 am
I bought them right when they went on sale, and I just got them in the mail a few days ago...
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: Vas Deferens on February 22, 2010, 06:09:41 pm
mine's at will call....paid $2 service charge by calling sixth and i...not sure if that's what you did, relaxer, or if you ordered on ticketma$$$ter.
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: Julian, Alleged Computer F**kface on February 22, 2010, 08:08:35 pm
Anyone downloaded the leak? Obviously as a triple album, there's some filler, no doubt, but definitely some gorgeous songs.
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: bellenseb on February 23, 2010, 09:55:18 am
Ha, 9.2 on Pitchfork!

Downloaded it this morning, took about three songs in to hear a melody...  :-\
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: Relaxer on February 23, 2010, 10:10:44 am
I usually need something catchy or crunchy in my most favored music, and the new one doesn't have a lot of either, but it is pretty fascinating. I figure its exactly one month until the 6th and I shows so that's about how long it will take to hear all of it.

Oh, and my tix arrived yesterday. Result!
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: James Ford on February 23, 2010, 10:27:01 am
Ha, 9.2 on Pitchfork!

Downloaded it this morning, took about three songs in to hear a melody...  :-\

Ha, a 4 on Popmatters!
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: BookerT on February 23, 2010, 11:35:31 am
i see pitchfork gave joanna newsom a 9.2.

but what did the album get?
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: azaghal1981 on February 23, 2010, 04:15:45 pm
I downloaded the leak friday but have yet to get around to it. Started it soon after downloading it and got side-tracked. After hearing four songs, I was missing the 50's Disney cartoon voice. She sounds...too normal?
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: Julian, Alleged Computer F**kface on February 23, 2010, 06:37:20 pm
i see pitchfork gave joanna newsom a 9.2.

but what did the album get?
This meme is starting to get old. We get it, Joanna Newsom is pretty, therefore everyone who listens to her must be doing it purely for that reason.
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: sweetcell on February 23, 2010, 06:48:15 pm
i thought bookerT's witticism was hilarious.  well done!
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: BookerT on February 23, 2010, 06:59:25 pm
i thought bookerT's witticism was hilarious.  well done!

well thank you!

man, tough crowd...
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: nkotb on March 08, 2010, 02:21:57 pm
I'm pushing through the album now (I'm guess I'm on disc one now), and it's pretty and all, but I just don't find it nearly as interesting as her first album.  Granted, it's just the first listen, but I could listen to Milk-Eyed Mender daily...this and Ys just don't have as much staying power, I don't think.

Still looking forward to the show, though.  Gotta imagine we're not getting much from her first disc, but I'm thinking with the orchestration and venue, should still be pretty good.
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: Relaxer on March 08, 2010, 03:06:30 pm
I've been surprised how much I like the new one, and I never got much into Ys or Milk, though I didn't try that hard either. But I play disc one of the One on Me quite a bit and dig it.
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: Christine Moritz on March 08, 2010, 06:04:12 pm
Did y'all see the recent New York Times article on Joanna Newsom?

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/07/magazine/07Newsom-t.html?hpw
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: thirsty moore on March 09, 2010, 10:55:34 am
I didn't know Joanna Newsom was fly.
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: Relaxer on March 09, 2010, 01:18:13 pm
hell yeah she's fly. to whit:

(http://userserve-ak.last.fm/serve/_/5775387/Joanna+Newsom+Joannabathroom.jpg)
(http://stereogum.com/img/joanna_newsom-bam27.jpg)
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2212/2234511756_311ac9c090_o.jpg)
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: Relaxer on March 09, 2010, 01:19:21 pm
unfortunately there's also the samberg factor:

(http://brightcove.vo.llnwd.net/d6/unsecured/media/429149625/429149625_1788940390_andy-samberg-large.jpg)
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: James Ford on March 09, 2010, 01:30:56 pm
I was sampling a bit of her new album on my pc, and my wife remarked that she was surprised that I would be listening to Tori Amos.
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: Julian, Alleged Computer F**kface on March 09, 2010, 04:49:09 pm
I was sampling a bit of her new album on my pc, and my wife remarked that she was surprised that I would be listening to Tori Amos.
Ah, another classic Rhett post consisting of "for reasons I'll never explain, I/Celeste was listening to music we don't like and here's our snarky comment we came up with hours later but are going to act like we came up with off the top of our heads."

Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: thirsty moore on March 09, 2010, 10:42:22 pm
I was sampling a bit of her new album on my pc, and my wife remarked that she was surprised that I would be listening to Tori Amos.
lol @ur wife
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: Relaxer on March 23, 2010, 09:07:17 am
Any comments on last night's show? I'm especially interested in general times of doors, opening band, Jo-Nu, etc.
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: James Ford on March 23, 2010, 09:17:03 am
Maybe he was seeking inspiration for his next political character or just hoping to hobnob with Rahm Emanuel, but either way, "Saturday Night Live" cast member Andy Samberg was spotted roaming the White House halls Monday morning.

The White House didn't responded to Yeas & Nays on Samberg's agenda, or whether he was able to meet with his muse Emanuel, but we do know that he's staying at W hotel. Our spies spotted him in the lobby Monday morning.



Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/blogs/yeas-and-nays/Sightings_-Samberg-spotted-at-the-White-House-88858882.html#ixzz0j0O8OgO0
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: MonkeyPants on March 23, 2010, 01:02:43 pm
Others can comment and will probably say it was transcendent, but I don't.  It was fine.  It was the right venue for her, but it certainly was not worth $30 plus fees for me.  Even though the opening "band" (which consisted of two guys with one guitar who want to be a more melodic Flight of the Conchords) was done around 8:30, Newsom didn't go on until almost 20 after 9, even though all of her band's gear was already set up and the harp was tuned before 9.  I have no idea why I had to sit there for 45 minutes waiting for her.

She was fine, but not all that interesting live, and the way she contorts her face whilst singing is very distracting if you're close enough to see it.  Better to just listen to her on CD, in my opinion.
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: azaghal1981 on March 23, 2010, 02:06:10 pm
Hahahahhahahahahaha that's such a Joe comment.


and the way she contorts her face whilst singing is very distracting if you're close enough to see it. 
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: Vas Deferens on March 23, 2010, 02:30:36 pm
her ex-bf does the same thing (Bill Callahan/smog)...like he's chewing little kids....

saw him years ago (she opened) and i laughed the entire time...
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: teepo on March 23, 2010, 02:37:44 pm
ufff, i don't know if i'm up for going to this and monkeypants comments aren't encouraging.

can you tell me what time her set ended last night?
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: azaghal1981 on March 23, 2010, 02:44:31 pm
Scalp it on CL and scope out an extra outside of Spoon. You'd probably be more entertained by them.
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: azaghal1981 on March 23, 2010, 02:48:39 pm
Just imagine the endless possibilities of weird faces she and Callahan made while they were having sex. And the squeaks she made.


her ex-bf does the same thing (Bill Callahan/smog)...like he's chewing little kids....

saw him years ago (she opened) and i laughed the entire time...
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: teepo on March 23, 2010, 04:29:32 pm
welp, i have a potential buyer. hope i'm making the right decision.
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: Relaxer on March 23, 2010, 04:45:46 pm
Scalp it on CL and scope out an extra outside of Spoon. You'd probably be more entertained by them.

Joanna Newsom will rock 19x more than Spoon will.
A deaf-mute-dumb paraplegic will rock 4x more than Spoon will.
The dead body of Gerald Ford will rock 2x more than Spoon will.
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: Mabdul Doobakus on March 23, 2010, 05:43:18 pm
I went and thought it was awesome.  I agree about the long wait time between the opener and Joanna.  There was no reason for that.  I've always assumed venues do that to sell more beer, but there's no beer to sell at 6th and I, so who knows...

First time at the venue, and it was a beautiful place for a show.  I wasn't close enough to see her facial contortions in any great detail, so none of that bothered me, but her voice is better live, and watching her play the harp is kind of mesmerzing.  You get a much better sense of how varied and intricate her playing really is.  I think things lulled a little when she went to go play the piano for a few songs.  I couldn't actually see her at all at this point, as the giant harp was in her way.  Her backing band was okay, although I couldn't quite understand the point of the guy to her right.  He would switch instruments every 20 seconds, play for like 2 seconds, and then switch again.  I got the impression he was just making shit up on the fly, especially during the closing song, when he seemed to be on his own little world for a while, providing accompaniment that just didn't fit at all.  He also seemed like kind of an arrogant douche.  Rest of the band was appropriately low key.  I also thought Emily (the song) sounded unbelievably awesome, maybe one of the top 5 or so concert song experiences for me. 

Anyway, I'd go again tonight, if I had a ticket...it's definitely worth it.
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: James Ford on March 24, 2010, 08:09:52 am
Hahahahhahahahahaha that's such a Joe comment.


and the way she contorts her face whilst singing is very distracting if you're close enough to see it. 


(http://blog.washingtonpost.com/clicktrack/st-newsomweb3.jpg)

"Oooh, Andy, it's so big."

(cue NKOTB response here)
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: Relaxer on March 24, 2010, 09:53:56 am
I disliked almost everything about this show. Arriving at 7:00 and then waiting out in the rain for half an hour for them to open the doors. The unbelievably, mind-staggeringly bad opening act (I'd say they were the most painful act I've seen in 10+ years -- only the Dude of Life in 1995 hurt me more). The 45-minute wait between the end of the openers and Joanna starting up. Her drummer and the constant nerdy robotic flourish he added to every beat. The way the instrumentation usually drowned out the sound of the harp. The way the whole show just reeked art.

All that, and probably more, and yet it was great. The sound was incredible, she is a musical master on that thing, the sounds sounded great and the whole thing was just lovely.

I was however distracted by the drummer and his whole "DRUMMING IS SERIOUS BUSINESS" routine, plus the fact that he was wearing a heavy sports jacket, a sweater, a shirt and presumably an undershirt. I mean, dude aren't you even a little warm in that get-up?

Anyway, a hard-won thumbs up.
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: thirsty moore on March 24, 2010, 01:02:16 pm
You saw the dude of life. Oh man.
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: Firebutt McGee on March 24, 2010, 03:35:32 pm
Went to night 1 of Joanna with my mom, and we both LOVED it from the balcony. Her facial contortions didn't bother me. The songs were the real highlight, and they came across gorgeous and really powerful live. More than a couple of people were crying in my row. You can't really deny her talent, guys.

Spoon was amazing last night though...get with it.
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: azaghal1981 on March 24, 2010, 06:51:42 pm
You went last night too?


Wish I would've known.
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: Relaxer on March 25, 2010, 10:25:06 am
Tuesday's show is up on npr.org
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: walkonby on March 25, 2010, 07:24:52 pm
did this girl just pop up out the blue, or has she been establishing herself for years and it is just now that people are noticing, like me?  i've seen so many articles and visual entertainment with her name attached to it here lately as if she is the thing to listen to "for those in the (k)now."  i guess i'll have to listen to her somehow or other and make a judgement.
Title: Re: joanna newsom
Post by: Julian, Alleged Computer F**kface on March 25, 2010, 09:39:53 pm
did this girl just pop up out the blue, or has she been establishing herself for years and it is just now that people are noticing, like me? 
Wow, man, yeah, she's pretty established. Her first two records sold over a quarter of million a piece (pretty high for modern indie harp music) and were lauded by the pitchfork's and tinymixtapes' of the world. She had been dissected and debated ad nauseum long before the release of Have One On Me.