930 Forums
=> GENERAL DISCUSSION => Topic started by: Cock Van Der Palm on March 03, 2015, 06:20:19 pm
-
#10. Carry on.
-
What's the over/under on the number of burning couches in College Park after the Terps go out in the third round of the Tourney?
-
I'd take getting to the third round. Would only burn 1 couch and maybe an area rug, but would still be pretty happy.
-
Worse college sports fuckheads?
Vatechhokies or umdterps?
-
Worse college sports fuckheads?
Vatechhokies or umdterps?
Throw in all these new Alabama fans from the last few years and just call it a three way tie.
-
I'd take getting to the third round. Would only burn 1 couch and maybe an area rug, but would still be pretty happy.
Because of these silly play-in games, "third round" in the NCAA vernacular actually means the round of 32.
-
Oh if thats the case, then I'd definitely burn a few more couches. I'd be content with a Sweet 16 showing.
-
I'd take getting to the third round. Would only burn 1 couch and maybe an area rug, but would still be pretty happy.
Because of these silly play-in games, "third round" in the NCAA vernacular actually means the round of 32.
I thought they gave up on that nomenclature and now the play-ins are the "Opening round" and the round of 64 is "first round", no? Or am I imagining this?
-
I'd take getting to the third round. Would only burn 1 couch and maybe an area rug, but would still be pretty happy.
Because of these silly play-in games, "third round" in the NCAA vernacular actually means the round of 32.
I thought they gave up on that nomenclature and now the play-ins are the "Opening round" and the round of 64 is "first round", no? Or am I imagining this?
http://www.ncaa.com/interactive-bracket/basketball-men/d1
-
I'd take getting to the third round. Would only burn 1 couch and maybe an area rug, but would still be pretty happy.
Because of these silly play-in games, "third round" in the NCAA vernacular actually means the round of 32.
I thought they gave up on that nomenclature and now the play-ins are the "Opening round" and the round of 64 is "first round", no? Or am I imagining this?
http://www.ncaa.com/interactive-bracket/basketball-men/d1
OK, I'm imagining things again, apparently.
EDIT: Apparently I'm not, I'm just a year early. (http://ftw.usatoday.com/2014/11/march-madness-first-round-ncaa-tournament)
-
Worse college sports fuckheads?
Vatechhokies or umdterps?
Not that it is a scientific test or anything but of the terps and hokies I know, the terps are by far and way the larger bags of douche.
-
Worse college sports fuckheads?
Vatechhokies or umdterps?
Not that it is a scientific test or anything but of the terps and hokies I know, the terps are by far and way the larger bags of douche.
I'd like to add UVA rapists.
(http://i.imgur.com/PWM3rxt.jpg)
-
I'd like to add UVA rapists.
That's been pretty conclusively refuted. Rolling Stone had to apologize for the article.
-
I'd like to add UVA rapists.
That's been pretty conclusively refuted. Rolling Stone had to apologize for the article.
I'd be willing to bet there are still plenty of rapists at UVA.
-
I'd be willing to bet there are still plenty of rapists at UVA.
As opposed to what school? What an inane take.
-
I'd be willing to bet there are still plenty of rapists at UVA.
As opposed to what school? What an inane take.
I didn't even read the Rolling Stone article, my assumptions are purely based on the type of fart brothers that attend UVA. In regards to comparing it to other university sexual assault stats, I'd be willing to bet any university that is fart-centric has higher stats.
(http://cdn29.elitedaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/32aae92c32f3666b705b97e9250d7686.jpg)
-
I'd be willing to bet there are still plenty of rapists at UVA.
As opposed to what school? What an inane take.
I didn't even read the Rolling Stone article, my assumptions are purely based on the type of fart brothers that attend UVA. In regards to comparing it to other university sexual assault stats, I'd be willing to bet any university that is fart-centric has higher stats.
(http://cdn29.elitedaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/32aae92c32f3666b705b97e9250d7686.jpg)
According to this article (http://collegestats.org/2013/02/the-most-dangerous-schools-for-women/), University of Richmond and Va Tech have higher stats.
And according to this article (http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/sex-offense-statistics-show-us-college-reports-are-rising/2014/07/01/982ecf32-0137-11e4-b8ff-89afd3fad6bd_story.html) Julian's beloved Univ of Michigan is #2.
-
And according to this article (http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/sex-offense-statistics-show-us-college-reports-are-rising/2014/07/01/982ecf32-0137-11e4-b8ff-89afd3fad6bd_story.html) Julian's beloved Univ of Michigan is #2.
They're still #1 to me.
But seriously, that list doesn't really take into consideration that universities have different enrollments. Comparing a 50,000 person state university to a small liberal arts college is of course going to show a large disparity.
-
And according to this article (http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/sex-offense-statistics-show-us-college-reports-are-rising/2014/07/01/982ecf32-0137-11e4-b8ff-89afd3fad6bd_story.html) Julian's beloved Univ of Michigan is #2.
They're still #1 to me.
But seriously, that list doesn't really take into consideration that universities have different enrollments. Comparing a 50,000 person state university to a small liberal arts college is of course going to show a large disparity.
Gallaudet is like rape central:
http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/page/local/sex-offenses-on-us-college-campuses/1077/
Maybe he just didn't hear her when she said "no"....
-
I somehow knew Randolph Macon would show up very high if I sorted by incidents/1,000 students.
-
And according to this article (http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/sex-offense-statistics-show-us-college-reports-are-rising/2014/07/01/982ecf32-0137-11e4-b8ff-89afd3fad6bd_story.html) Julian's beloved Univ of Michigan is #2.
They're still #1 to me.
But seriously, that list doesn't really take into consideration that universities have different enrollments. Comparing a 50,000 person state university to a small liberal arts college is of course going to show a large disparity.
and small liberal arts schools don't have a fart scene.
-
And according to this article (http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/sex-offense-statistics-show-us-college-reports-are-rising/2014/07/01/982ecf32-0137-11e4-b8ff-89afd3fad6bd_story.html) Julian's beloved Univ of Michigan is #2.
They're still #1 to me.
But seriously, that list doesn't really take into consideration that universities have different enrollments. Comparing a 50,000 person state university to a small liberal arts college is of course going to show a large disparity.
and small liberal arts schools don't have a fart scene.
Again, I cite: Randolph Macon.
-
Nice to see Turgeon get nominated for Coach of the Year. He's done a hell of a job this season after five players transferred out of the program, let alone be projected tenth place in their inaugural year of the conference. Instead they went 17-1 at home, beat Wisconsin, and swept Izzo's squad. Dez Wells has been playing out of his mind the last few games. I'm just glad I can finally watch Selection Sunday again.
-
Nice to see Turgeon get nominated for Coach of the Year. He's done a hell of a job this season after five players transferred out of the program, let alone be projected tenth place in their inaugural year of the conference. Instead they went 17-1 at home, beat Wisconsin, and swept Izzo's squad. Dez Wells has been playing out of his mind the last few games. I'm just glad I can finally watch Selection Sunday again.
For some perspective, I believe they were picked tenth in the Big Ten in the preseason media poll that was put out. Fantastic coaching job.