Originally posted by Etan de Balzac, Footie Ball Player:
But really, who did punk really matter to in this country? I graduated from a class of 200 in 1985, and I can't remember anybody who was in the couple of grades ahead of me or behind me who were into punk at all.
It seems that punk was mostly a thing for a very tiny group of jaded upper middle class suburban white kids.
It was hugely influential to many musicians and spawned several different, new genres of music.
Just because it was not commerically successful does not mean it was not influential.
I forget who said this, but it's apt for this discussion:
"Only 1,000 people bought the first Velvet Underground record, but all 1,000 of them became musicians."
Not classifying VU as completely punk, just making a comparison to commerical vs. influential.