Which FLAME WARRIOR are you?

I thought I'd repoast this so the newbies can take a good shellacking.
 ----------------------
 
  Which FLAME WARRIOR are you/

[Sir HC]

We do have a lot of Archivists.  I don't know who I am, and I think for the most part you always make yourself seem better than you really are.

[Celeste]

This is clever...I love the little illustrations...

Mank?  Is that you?

flawd?
  Liberte?
  thatguy?
  Rhett Rhett  Rhett
  ggw?
  kosmo?
  markie?

[ggw]

VIOLENTMOODSWINGS
 Samantha
 Mankie

[poorlulu]

dupek..............
 http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame46.html
 
 samantha..........
 http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame40.html
 
 jaguar..............(but mostly for the cat reference)
 http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame24.html

[Celeste]

Originally posted by Dupek Chopra:
  flawd?
  Liberte?
  thatguy?
  Rhett Rhett  Rhett
  ggw?
  kosmo?
  markie?

hmm, those assessments of other boardies (except Rhett) seem uncharacteristic of you

[ggw]

Rhett & Celeste
 
 or:
 
 Rhett & Celeste

[Celeste]

Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
  Rhett & Celeste
 
 or:
 
 Rhett & Celeste

I'm definitely not the Nanny...that would be more suitable for someone like Bags or Markie who always reprimand people for their racist or looksist or sizist comments...

[Bags]

I did that once....which indicates to me that you're rather an  archivist in your leanings.  And in fact, I didn't even remark on the porky comment, but on what I read as a pretty smug reply to that by you.
 
 But, that's over.
 
 I see myself as an  eagle scout because I tend to post lots of articles and links, but I realize that's picking one of the few pretty positive profiles.

[Celeste]

Originally posted by Bagster:
  I did that once....which indicates to me that you're rather an  archivist in your leanings.  And in fact, I didn't even remark on the porky comment, but on what I read as a pretty smug reply to that by you.
 
 But, that's over.
 
 I see myself as an  eagle scout because I tend to post lots of articles and links, but I realize that's picking one of the few pretty positive profiles.

I can live with being an archivist...fortunately for me there's no archetype for "yes man" or "vacuous bimbo"...
 
 I kinda took you for  one a these too, maybe, but again, that's not really so shameful, and I doubt whether others on here would agree with me

[Bags]

Well, maybe if you substitute the random discussion of my cat (because I don't have one, nor would have one) with the random discussion of Dave Grohl, I can buy it.  I didn't think I was full of vacuous comments, but hey, we all think we're more interesting than we really are.

[Celeste]

it's the spirit, not the letter...

[markie]

Just trying to digest all this.......
 
 I would say that some of the charectisations are very accurate.
 
 But GGW is clearly Kung Fu master.
 
 Kosmo is clearly royalty.
 
 
 Dupek had them the opposite way around.
 
 
 Am I really Big dog? If so who is me too?