Author Topic: For Walky  (Read 730691 times)

hutch

  • Guest
Re: For Walky
« Reply #1665 on: March 22, 2019, 12:46:20 pm »
I just want to get along...

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: For Walky
« Reply #1666 on: March 22, 2019, 12:47:07 pm »
children this got ugly quick....Yada...use the NSFW tag that's all we ask

Not that I want to defend it, but the link CLEARLY said nsfw in it's URL, hence why I never clicked it.

Or do you guys not read the full URL before you click something from this forum?  Fools.
27>34

hutch

  • Guest
Re: For Walky
« Reply #1667 on: March 22, 2019, 12:47:51 pm »
Bush ha ha ha ha


All fake news

Julian, Bespoke SEXPERT

  • Member
  • Posts: 28932
  • 11x MVP, 1st Posts, HoF, Certified Weblebrity
Re: For Walky
« Reply #1668 on: March 22, 2019, 12:54:44 pm »
Look, this is getting out of hand. For the record, no one me gave any information on Yada. He posted photos that linked back to his online photo album account at some point which had a username he used other places online and 30 seconds of Googling that name plus "Maryland" gave me his "information". 95% of the regulars on here are interconnected via social media and attending the same concerts so this whole "doxxing" thing is absurd.

For the record, I do not dislike Yada or have any real issue with him. I think its patently absurd for him to repeatedly make up fake jobs that he wants to claim I have and then when I respond with any actual job he once had for him to fly off the handle but whatever. Seems a bit "thin-skinned kettle calling the pot black," but whatever.

For the further record, I dislike Hutch and have real issues with him, THAT SAID, I was very much in the wrong to reference his child and any details about said child and regret doing so. I would like to think that if that situation played out again, I would not have responded the way I did.

No one should leave the forum over this silly argument. For my part, I apologize for mentioning one of Yada's past jobs (note: intentionally not his current employer/field) in response to his constant refrain of mocking me for make-believe jobs he likes to pretend I do. I felt that was tit-for-a-tat, but clearly it was taken more maliciously, and for that I am sorry.

I do not require an apology from either Yada or Hutch.

Now lets get back to discussing whose musical taste is terrible and unicorns and commas.
« Last Edit: March 22, 2019, 01:39:45 pm by Julian, Thinly-Veiled Outrage IMPRESARIO »
LVMH

grateful

  • Member
  • Posts: 10292
  • 👤 👩 👦 📷 📺
    • Wait, the entire rest of the internet exists and you CHOOSE to post here? Who hurt you?
Re: For Walky
« Reply #1669 on: March 22, 2019, 12:56:38 pm »
And burritos.

Julian, Bespoke SEXPERT

  • Member
  • Posts: 28932
  • 11x MVP, 1st Posts, HoF, Certified Weblebrity
Re: For Walky
« Reply #1670 on: March 22, 2019, 12:57:47 pm »
And burritos.
Yes, and burritos. My bad.
LVMH

nkotb

  • Member
  • Posts: 6173
Re: For Walky
« Reply #1671 on: March 22, 2019, 12:59:09 pm »
LOL things are exactly the same here. That whips.

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: For Walky
« Reply #1672 on: March 22, 2019, 01:14:55 pm »
LOL things are exactly the same here. That whips.

I think there's some showing off for you.  Things were pretty quiet for a while.
27>34

nkotb

  • Member
  • Posts: 6173
Re: For Walky
« Reply #1673 on: March 22, 2019, 01:17:41 pm »
I'm honored!!!

LOL things are exactly the same here. That whips.

I think there's some showing off for you.  Things were pretty quiet for a while.

hutch

  • Guest
Re: For Walky
« Reply #1674 on: March 22, 2019, 01:19:12 pm »
So you’re saying there’s a chance?

Re: For Walky
« Reply #1675 on: March 22, 2019, 01:21:28 pm »
children this got ugly quick....Yada...use the NSFW tag that's all we ask

Not that I want to defend it, but the link CLEARLY said nsfw in it's URL, hence why I never clicked it.

Or do you guys not read the full URL before you click something from this forum?  Fools.
I didn't see that and now it's gone
I typically read the URL...but sometimes when it's from a trusted source, I don't
Yada has proven in the past to drop some dozies, so I'm cautious with him

LOL things are exactly the same here. That whips.

I think there's some showing off for you.  Things were pretty quiet for a while.
that's some POTW material there
« Last Edit: March 22, 2019, 01:23:22 pm by Sïdehätch ılıll|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|̲̅̅=̲̅̅|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|llıl »
slack

walkonbyeeeeeeeee

  • Guest
Re: For Walky
« Reply #1676 on: March 22, 2019, 02:28:37 pm »
my thread . . . rules.  this place, rules.  the internet, rules.  the reality which all of that, exists in, rules.  the fact, I got a new page, rules.

walkonbyeeeeeeeee

  • Guest
Re: For Walky
« Reply #1677 on: April 18, 2019, 09:23:26 pm »
that last response posted in here by me, I am sure was on the top of the next page . . . which is why I commented the way I did, through edit of course.  now, that is a, conspiracy.  but any,way:

https://www.outsports.com/2019/4/16/18312054/chickfila-zamboni-protesters-hockey-cincinnati-cyclones-antigay-signs-protest-echl

I laughed.  I smiled.  gurll, that was good.

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: For Walky
« Reply #1678 on: April 19, 2019, 12:22:19 am »
Yep. Great prank and they couldn't stop it after it started until the ice was clear.
27>34

Re: For Walky
« Reply #1679 on: May 09, 2019, 12:25:35 pm »
thought you might like this...
Howard Stern says he has changed. How much?
slack