Author Topic: ORIOLES  (Read 477003 times)

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: ORIOLES
« Reply #1005 on: July 31, 2013, 02:59:01 pm »
CAno

Yes, I'll update it now and congrats to him.

I would be worried at all about his 40 strikeouts in his last 83 at-bats....

Guess who has zero homers since the HR Derby......

Yoenis Cespedes
Chris Davis
Michael Cuddyer
And Robinson Cano
27>34

K8teebug

  • Member
  • Posts: 4124
Re: ORIOLES
« Reply #1006 on: July 31, 2013, 04:00:19 pm »
Bud Norris to the Orioles!  For Hoes (tee hee) and a yet to be named prospect.

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: ORIOLES
« Reply #1007 on: July 31, 2013, 04:19:15 pm »
Bud Norris to the Orioles!  For Hoes (tee hee) and a yet to be named prospect.

Wow. In it to win it. 

Hoes is a hefty prospect for a two month rental.
27>34

atomicfront

  • Guest
Re: ORIOLES
« Reply #1008 on: July 31, 2013, 04:36:09 pm »
Bud Norris to the Orioles!  For Hoes (tee hee) and a yet to be named prospect.

Wow. In it to win it. 

Hoes is a hefty prospect for a two month rental.

He isn't a rental.  Norris has two more years after this year under team control.  We also gave up the compensation pick which I think is a bigger loss than Hoes. 

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: ORIOLES
« Reply #1009 on: July 31, 2013, 04:45:58 pm »
He isn't a rental.  Norris has two more years after this year under team control.  We also gave up the compensation pick which I think is a bigger loss than Hoes. 

Oh yeah - shit, he's only ARB eligible next year.  That's a great deal then and makes MUCH more sense to me.

I thought I read it on ESPN but alas, it was in the stupid comments.  My bad for not fact checking.
27>34

shemptiness

  • Member
  • Posts: 3317
Re: ORIOLES
« Reply #1010 on: July 31, 2013, 05:22:46 pm »
Bud Norris to the Orioles!  For Hoes (tee hee) and a yet to be named prospect.

Wow. In it to win it. 

Hoes is a hefty prospect for a two month rental.

He's under club control until 2015.  (as has been said)

Hammel to DL
« Last Edit: July 31, 2013, 05:30:48 pm by Shemp »

shemptiness

  • Member
  • Posts: 3317
Re: ORIOLES
« Reply #1011 on: July 31, 2013, 10:01:26 pm »
Fire the mana........  hitting coach!   ;D

James Ford

  • Member
  • Posts: 5620
Re: ORIOLES
« Reply #1012 on: August 01, 2013, 07:50:37 am »
I don't have cable so don't get any O's games, but it looks like they played like the Nats last night.

What's the deal with Manny? 39 doubles in 87 games, then 0 doubles in 20 games.

Got Haggis?

  • Member
  • Posts: 2008
Re: ORIOLES
« Reply #1013 on: August 01, 2013, 07:56:56 am »
they played the astros

and had a melt down

at least they didn't let anyone steal home this time i guess

K8teebug

  • Member
  • Posts: 4124
Re: ORIOLES
« Reply #1014 on: August 01, 2013, 08:25:11 am »
Last night's loss hurt.

ouch.

shemptiness

  • Member
  • Posts: 3317
Re: ORIOLES
« Reply #1015 on: August 01, 2013, 08:47:02 am »
I think close losses hurt more then blowouts.  Easier to turn the page on a blowout.

atomicfront

  • Guest
Re: ORIOLES
« Reply #1016 on: August 01, 2013, 10:06:58 am »
I think close losses hurt more then blowouts.  Easier to turn the page on a blowout.

Not really.  I was at the game last night and I left after the sixth inning.  Totally a wasted night.  Boring and no excitement.  I saw Jim Johnson blow two games in one week and at least they were exciting until the last pitch. 

atomicfront

  • Guest
Re: ORIOLES
« Reply #1017 on: August 01, 2013, 10:08:20 am »
I don't have cable so don't get any O's games, but it looks like they played like the Nats last night.

What's the deal with Manny? 39 doubles in 87 games, then 0 doubles in 20 games.

He sucks balls recently.  Pitchers have adjusted to him and he hasn't adjusted  back. Can't hit a slider to save his life.  He should be moved down in the order and given a couple of days off.  He isn't doing anyone any favors right now with his bat.


K8teebug

  • Member
  • Posts: 4124
Re: ORIOLES
« Reply #1019 on: August 01, 2013, 11:27:28 am »
Exactly.