Author Topic: Musicological banter  (Read 1341191 times)

hutch

  • Member
  • Posts: 5126
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #4020 on: May 15, 2025, 02:53:32 pm »
Ive always felt that the excessive compression on Signals - which renders it unlistenable - is one of the worst tragedies of the era.

I mean, besides the, y’know, actual problems.

What I’m trying to say is that it’s a great album that’s painful to listen to. I sometimes still do though.

Wow. I do not agree assuming you are talking about Rush…was just playing in car last week..just a regular American version with the atom design on cd

I mean maybe I don’t know what excessive compression sounds like

It’s not brickwalled or ear fatiguing

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 22262
  • 12x MVP, and yet I don't belong here.
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #4021 on: May 15, 2025, 03:36:19 pm »
yeah, i was confused too... i had to google "Signals" to see if any other bands released a similarly titled album, didn't find anything.

HOWEVER, per the googles, apparently Signals does get knocked for being much more compressed/bricked than anything they had put out before that.  wasn't something i ever noticed...  the shift to more keyboards probably also contributes to the wall-of-sound effect.
<sig>

hutch

  • Member
  • Posts: 5126
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #4022 on: May 15, 2025, 03:47:38 pm »
Never noticed then again my first copy was a super shitty Argentine cassette.

But I have listened to lp and cd and never noticed

What I do knock is that the album feels a bit slight to me…. I like it a lot but it’s no moving pictures or grace or power windows

Obviously subdivisions is amazing….the reggae tune..pfft

Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #4023 on: May 15, 2025, 04:55:08 pm »
the reggae tune..pfft
It can’t possibly be worse than a roll the bones
slack